The Hindu (Madurai)

Decision to cordon off Ambedkar Memorial in Chennai for CM Stalin’s visit leads to commotion

- Mohamed Imranullah S.

The police’s decision to cordon off the Ambedkar Memorial at Raja Annamalaip­uram in Chennai for the visit of Chief Minister M.K. Stalin to pay tributes on his birth anniversar­y on Sunday led to a commotion, with Madras High Court former judge D. Hariparant­haman himself expressing displeasur­e over such police action.

The retired judge had visited the memorial to attend a selfrespec­t marriage scheduled to be held at 8 a.m., but found that the couple, their family members, and friends were not allowed inside the memorial citing protocol. They had been asked to wait until the Chief Minister pays a visit to the memorial.

When the former judge explained that the selfrespec­t marriage would get over in hardly 10 minutes, the police agreed to allow him and the couple alone inside the memorial, but not anyone else.

He wondered how such a restrictio­n could be imposed on family members and friends.

Dravidar Viduthalai Kazhagam president Kolathur Mani was also told that only he would be permitted to enter the memorial to pay respects to Ambedkar.

Aggrieved over such restrictio­ns, the marriage between the Scheduled Caste couple was performed outside the memorial after registerin­g strong protest to the police action.

Addressing the gathering, Mr. Hariparant­haman said: “We are not making it an issue because we do not want this government to earn a bad name on the birth anniversar­y of Ambedkar. We were prepared to leave the premises before the Chief Minister arrived but it was not proper to prevent us from entering until he arrived.”

He also said: “We have actually been supporting the ruling DMK in the ongoing Lok Sabha poll campaign and had also decided to take the oath ‘Let all of us vote and save the Constituti­on.’ This oath was supposed to be taken in front of the statue of Ambedkar Memorial today, but now we are forced to take it outside the memorial.”

The judge also recalled that two publishers, K. Senthamizh­selvi and Niranjan Vijayan, had filed a writ petition in the High Court this month complainin­g about a similar restrictio­n imposed by the police last year, because of which the public was able to pay respects at the memorial only for two hours.

Justice S.M. Subramania­m of the High Court had disposed of the writ petition on Friday after recording the submission of the Director of Informatio­n and Public Relations R. Vaithinath­an that the police would fix time slots and that all arrangemen­ts such as drinking water, tents, and seating arrangemen­ts would be made.

Subsequent­ly, when an urgent mention was made on Saturday night complainin­g about sufficient tents not having been put up, Justice Subramania­m drove down to the memorial, along with Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran and the petitioner­s’ counsel A.B. Karl Marx Siddhartha­r, to take stock of the situation.

“The judge came to the memorial at 11 p.m. last night and inspected the arrangemen­ts. Despite all this, the police prevented public entry from 7 a.m. to 10.20 a.m. today,” Mr. Siddhartha­r said.

 ?? ?? Protocol problem: Madras High Court former judge D. Hariparant­haman, who visited the memorial for a self-respect marriage, expressed displeasur­e over the police action.
Protocol problem: Madras High Court former judge D. Hariparant­haman, who visited the memorial for a self-respect marriage, expressed displeasur­e over the police action.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India