Candidate with special needs deserves better treatment at exam centre, says HC
The court said if the facilities required by the petitioner were denied, she would not be able to take NEET. It would lead to discrimination that was forbidden under Article 14 of the Constitution. Bene cial principles and doctrines had to be expansively
Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has held that any candidate not necessarily suering from a disability dened under The Right of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016, but having special needs by virtue of his/her biological condition is entitled to ‘reasonable accommodation’.
The observation was made by Justice G.R. Swaminathan while allowing a petition led by a 19year-old girl, with a health condition, who is all set to take NEET (UG-2024). The petitioner is taking treatment for LETM/NMO/ Spectrum Disorder/Neurogenic
Bladder on OPD basis and her doctor has certied that she had lack of urine control, as a result of which she has to wear a diaper continuously and change it frequently.
She sought a direction to the National Testing Agency and the National Medical Commission to permit her to sit in the examination hall wearing a diaper and change it when required. Since there was no response to her representation, she led the present petition.
The court observed that the petitioner had to wear a diaper always and change it frequently. That would entail visit to a restroom. If the facilities required by the petitioner were denied, she would not be able to take the examination. It would lead to discrimination that was forbidden under Article 14 of the Constitution, the court observed.
There was no justication in restricting the principle of reasonable accommodation only to those suering from disabilities recognised under the
RPwD Act. All persons having disability had special needs. Benecial principles and doctrines had to be expansively construed and applied, the court observed.
“Every examination centre must have suitable toilet facilities... They must keep a minimum number of sanitary products near the toilets so that any girl who has come unprepared may use them. The girl candidates must be allowed the use of restrooms when required. The rest rooms can be thoroughly inspected in advance and regularly so that there is virtually no need for frisking the candidates for the second time. This will save the candidates’ precious examination time. It is the duty of the authorities to spread awareness so that the candidates are not put to any stress at all,” the court observed.
In the dress code, it would have been appropriate if the clause specically permitted wearing of sanitary pads by the girls. The examination authorities were directed to bear the special needs of girl children in mind and provide for reasonable accommodation, the court observed.
The court took into account that the National Testing Agency had agreed to the petitioner’s request and undertaken to issue suitable instruction to the city examiner. The court recorded it and allowed the petition.