The Hindu (Madurai)

Sanatana Dharma: SC seeks response from States, U.T. on Udhayanidh­i’s plea to club FIRs

-

The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to four States, a Union Territory and several individual­s on a petition ‹led by Tamil Nadu Minister Udhayanidh­i Stalin to club the FIRs registered against him over his remarks on Sanatana Dharma.

A Bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta sought responses from Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtr­a, Karnataka, Bihar, and Jammu and Kashmir, where cases had been registered against the DMK leader.

Mr. Udhayanidh­i was represente­d by senior advocates A.M. Singhvi, P. Wilson and Atul Chitle.

He had argued that his petition was not about the merits of the case, but focused on the question of procedure. He said that the registrati­on of multiple FIRs was a violation of his right to a fair trial, and amounted to “persecutio­n before prosecutio­n”.

“You abuse Article 19(1) (a) [free speech], you abuse Article 25 [freedom of conscience]. Now, you are coming here under Article 32 [writ protection of fundamenta­l rights]...You are not a layman. You are a Minister. You should have realised the consequenc­es,” Justice Datta had observed during a hearing on March 4.

Mr. Singhvi had referred to past cases involving television anchors Arnab Goswami, Amish Devgan and Nupur Sharma,

in which the top court had intervened and clubbed the FIRs in one place.

“I may lose or win the case on merits. But this is persecutio­n, making me run around. The FIRs are based on the same statement,” Mr. Singhvi had submitted.

Question of jurisdicti­on

The petition ‹led by Mr. Udhayanidh­i had said that it was well-settled in criminal law that only a criminal court, within whose territoria­l jurisdicti­on the alleged o¦ence took place, would proceed with the case.

Mr. Udhayanidh­i had made the speech at Kamarajar Auditorium in Chennai. The jurisdicti­on would be vested in a court in Chennai.

He had voiced apprehensi­on that inquiries in Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtr­a would “certainly have political overtones” and a¦ect his right to a fair trial.

 ?? ?? The registrati­on of multiple FIRs was a violation of the right to a fair trial, the Minister said.
The registrati­on of multiple FIRs was a violation of the right to a fair trial, the Minister said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India