The Indian Express (Delhi Edition)

Rahane rues soft dismissal, after solid start

- PRESS TRUST OF INDIA AJINKYA RAHANE

LOSING THE toss on brownish track is painful. Losing it when you have already lost your regular skipper and best batsman, Kane Williamson, hurts more. But to their credit, the visitors finished Day One stronger with India struggling at 239/7.

About an hour and half after he had won the toss, Virat Kohli was back on the pitch. With openers Shikhar Dhawan and Murali Vijay out inside 12 overs, Kohli needed to justify the decision to bat first.

True to the curators’ prediction, the ball was doing a significan­t bit and the variable bounce was making things difficult for the batters. Matt Henry’s back of a length delivery kept a little low as Dhawan chopped it on to his stumps. In the previous over, New Zealand keeper BJ Watling had to jump full length to collect a Trent Boult delivery that was pitched up. Vijay nicked a Henry outswinger that he had to play but the spectators didn’t mind. The star attraction of Indian batting was at the crease.

This New Zealand team has a definite plan for Kohli. First, they try to cramp him for room and denying him quick singles. Then suddenly they try to induce him to play an expansive shot. They ploy worked at Kanpur, and in Kolkata too.

It's the kind of a delivery that Wasim Akram would regularly try out. First, peg the batsmen down with his benders on the stumps, before hurling one full and wide. Sensing a chance to release pressure, the batsmen would go at it, and Ijaz Ahmed at point or Salim Malik at gully would gobble up the greedy mistake. This time in Kolkata, Boult sent one full and wide, and Kohli promptly obliged by chasing it – bat well away from the body, and coming down at a crooked angle. The resultant edge wasn't a surprise, and the slice was pouched by Tom Latham at gully, who did really well to lunge to his right to come up with a good doublehand­ed catch. The score read 46/3 and the hosts were badly in need of a partnershi­p but Cheteshwar Pujara and Ajinkya Rahane gelled well.

Solid partnershi­p

Pujara’s strike-rate had returned to the spotlight – different views were expressed by Kohli and Anil Kumble – following erstwhile chief selector Sandeep Patil’s revelation during the Kanpur Test. But in conditions like these, strike-rate becomes insignific­ant. Applicatio­n comes to the fore. And the Saurashtra batsman showed plenty of it to thwart the opposition.

He took 10 balls to get off the mark, waiting to get one in the range. Henry obliged and Pujara hit him for back-to-back fours. When Boult bowled full, he drove him through covers. Loose balls were at a premium but Pujara was patient. It was Test match batting of very high class.

Jeetan Patel, who last played for New Zealand in 2013 before reinventin­g himself in county cricket with Warwickshi­re, came and found the outside edge. The ball, however, flew between the keeper and slip for a four, as the first slip went the wrong way. It was a phase when Pujara had been looking a tad edgy but that escape helped him concentrat­e harder.

His partner Ajinkya Rahane, too, took his time to settle down as India went to lunch at 57/3. With the sun beating down, conditions became a little easier for batting as the day progressed. And both Pujara and Rahane were positive, hardly missing a scoring opportunit­y. New Zealand bowlers rarely missed their line and length, but whenever they did, the two Indian batters punished them.

Punishing mood

Henry bowled short and Pujara was back in a flash and drove it past point. The fast bowler overcorrec­ted his length and Pujara clipped him off his toes to the deep square leg boundary. Rahane’s cover drive against Patel was gorgeous. He read the flight beautifull­y and covered the turn. It has been a slow progress – run-rate hovering around twoand-a-half - but Pujara and Rahane never got completely bogged down. A partnershi­p was building and it released the pressure.

Pujara reached his fifty in 146 balls; his 10th in 61 Test innings. Rahane followed suit in 100 balls; his ninth in 47 innings. India’s 100 came in the 47th over and 150 in the 65th. The two batsmen deserved some luck –a very close leg before shout against Pujara off Mitchell Santner was negated.

The Indians upped the ante after tea. The ball was old and the bowlers looked tired, chugging along in sweltering heat but the Kiwis stuck to their game plan. It was a twopaced pitch with the odd ball stopping. A short cover was in place for a mistimed drive and Pujara eventually fell into the trap as an uppish drive went straight to Martin Guptill.

Pujara was dismissed for 87, his third consecutiv­e half-century in the series. But he should be disappoint­ed with his conversion rate as he hasn’t scored a Test century since his 145 not out against Sri Lanka in Colombo in August last year.

Sharma disappoint­s

Next man in Rohit Sharma survived a run out chance, injuring himself in the process. But he departed next over, done in by an excellent Patel delivery that turned and jumped. But Sharma too has to share some blame; he batted as if he was surprised that the ball turned, and ended up poking it lamely to short-leg.

And then, the New Zealand offie Patel, in for the injured Mark Craig, trapped Rahane leg before with a faster one. The advantage was surrendere­d. The second new ball accounted for R Ashwin and India were once again under pressure. Pujara and Rahane had mounted a recovery with a 141-run fourth wicket partnershi­p but both got out at the wrong time.

“Yes, Pujara and I will take the blame, because we were set. He got out on 87 and I got out on 77. I think it was our responsibi­lity to carry the partnershi­p forward. See, batsmen just need one ball to get out, but I think if one of us had made a hundred, maybe our position would have been different,” Rahane said after the day’s play.

India would have been happy to finish the day with five wickets down but the couple of extra wickets evened it out. But the pitch is still unpredicta­ble, the ball is turning, and in the absence of Williamson, 300 could be a good enough first-innings total. BATTING WAS a challenge on an atypical Eden Garden wicket said Ajinkya Rahane , but also conceded that he and Cheteshwar Pujara were guilty of not making their partnershi­p big enough after the starts they had respective­ly got.

Rahane scored 77 while Pujara put on board 87, his third consecutiv­e Test half-century as India ended the day one at 239 for seven. The two batsmen men raised a crucial 141-run stand for the third fourth wicket when India were struggling at 46 for three.

He said it was not an archetypal wicket at the Eden Gardens. “It was not a typical Kolkata wicket. There was something in the wicket. It's two-paced. It was tough very humid in the second session. It was not a good day for us. We felt wicket will be very good. Generally it's flat and good for batting. There something for fast bowlers,” Rahane said.

He rued a few soft dismissals. “We had a few soft dismissals but partnershi­p between me and Pujara was crucial. Me and Pujara will take the blame as we both were set. It was our responsibi­lity to carry the partnershi­p forward. "A batsman just needs one ball to get out. But if we could have scored a century (each), our position would have been different. I am not blaming anyone else. Maybe it was our responsibi­lity,” he said.

Terming it a disappoint­ing day with India ending day one at 239 for seven, Rahane said: "You don't think about scoring a hundred. You play according to the situation. Maybe we lost our concentrat­ion. We lost two extra wickets. Five wickets would have been ideal.”

Having held their fort without losing any wicket in the second session, India lost four post-tea and Rahane said they got out trying to score quicker. “Defence is always important on a turning track. No one will get you out if your defence is solid, that's why we batted so strongly in the post-lunch session. But in third session we felt this is the only opportunit­y where we can score freely as the ball was old and the bowlers were all tired.

Stepping up run rate

Then they increased the tempo: "We tried to step up our run-rate and played with a lot of intent, not necessaril­y to score just boundaries. We tried to disturb their line and length. It was easy to play the spinners on the backfoot." However, all is not yet lost and Rahane believes if Wriddhiman Saha (14) and Ravindra Jadeja (0) could take the score past 325 it would be challengin­g. “Jadeja and Saha are batting. If they get to 325 or 350 tomorrow, it will be a good total on the first innings here."

Rahane further picked comeback man Jeetan Patel as the best among the lot in the Kiwis attack. Making a comeback as Mark Craig's replacemen­t, Patel was flown in from England where he was playing County cricket. It was his length that troubled the Indian batsmen, he said. “Jeetan Patel bowled consistent­ly and was quicker in the air. However, fast bowlers Matt Henry and Neil Wagner also bowled well and did not give away easy runs. The credit goes to them as well. It was hot and humid there. They bowled consistent­ly."

He, though, believes India are still in the game. “We have to bowl really well here. It's not easy for the batsmen. We have to bowl tight line and lengths," he added

About 15000 fans came to watch the match on day one. Asked about it, Rahane said it is tough for people to sit through the day in such heat and humidity. “It's very tough and credit should be given to the ones who turned up. If there's shade and good facilities available people will turn up. It will be good for cricket, the more support we get.”

 ?? Partha Paul ?? India were tottering at 46/3 before Pujara and Rahane resuscitat­ed them with a dogged partnershi­p that helped the hosts to a fairly respectabl­e 239/7.
Partha Paul India were tottering at 46/3 before Pujara and Rahane resuscitat­ed them with a dogged partnershi­p that helped the hosts to a fairly respectabl­e 239/7.
 ?? Partha Paul ?? Rahane overcame a wobbly start to compose a fluent half-century.
Partha Paul Rahane overcame a wobbly start to compose a fluent half-century.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India