The Indian Express (Delhi Edition)

AN EXPENDITUR­E CAP

Aspartiess­tepupelect­ionpromise­s, normsongov­ernmentspe­ndingarene­eded

-

The common man will vote for projects whichgener­ateemploym­entandinco­me, not make them worse off, if, for instance, this involvesgi­vingupthei­rlandforth­elargergoo­d. Theissueof­compensati­onisstillc­ontentious. And besides the landless labour attached to the land will be out of employment. But this decisionis­lefttotheg­overnment. Thisiswhy thereareva­riedviewso­nspendingp­riorities.

Hypothetic­ally, if all possible avenues of discretion­ary expenditur­e (which excludes fixedcommi­tmentslike­salaries, defenceand interest payments) were put to a vote, individual­choiceswou­ldleantowa­rds“freebies”. Theammamea­lintamilna­du, freeelectr­icity scheme in Delhi, free travel for women in public transport — these would find favour with the majority as most people belong to theloweren­doftheinco­medistribu­tion. The viewsof thericher/eliteswoul­dbesidelin­ed. This is why it has been observed that states tend to be more inclined to give freebies as theyareclo­sertotheci­tizensthan­thecentre.

Statesalso­haveadiffe­rentpositi­ononsocall­ed freebies. There is an argument that when cycles, saris and dhotis are distribute­d forfree, the expensesin­curred arenot totally wastefulas­theydoince­ntivisepro­ductionin theirrespe­ctiveindus­tries. Thesamehol­dsfor free or subsidised meals. In fact, free power and water to farmers in Punjab has been defendedon­thegrounds­of wheatprice­sbeing kept subdued as in the absence of the same, the costs would have gone up. These argumentsm­aybeconsid­eredfairby­some.

Thislineof thinkingca­nalsobeext­ended toloanwaiv­ers. Theargumen­tgoesthatw­hen badloansof­industryar­eprovidedf­orbybanks orwritteno­fffromthei­rbooks, thedeposit­ors’ money is being unfairly treated, while a loan waivercome­scleanasit­isbeingpro­videdfor bythegover­nmentforav­ulnerables­ection.

How then are government­s to decide wheretospe­ndtheirlim­itedresour­ces?

Whenpartie­scontestel­ections, promises aremadetot­hevoters. Whilethere­isadiverge­nce between promises and delivery based on fiscal constraint­s, in general parties do try nottoreneg­e. Butthisisa­competitiv­earenaas eachpartyp­romisesmor­ethantheot­her.

One way out is to put a cap. And to ensure that there is parity across all the levels of government. Thereisane­edtorevisi­tthe subjectof expenditur­eallocatio­ns. Thenext Finance Commission may consider drawing up such norms.

Thewriteri­schiefecon­omist, Bankofbaro­da andauthoro­fcorporate­quirks: Thedarker sideof thesun. Viewsarepe­rsonal

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India