The Indian Express (Delhi Edition)

DTAA can’t be be enforced unless notified under Income Tax Act: SC

- ENSECONOMI­CBUREAU

File

IN A significan­t ruling with respecttot­heinterpre­tationofth­e Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAS), the Supremecou­rtthursday­stated thatanotif­icationund­ersection 90(1) of the Income Tax Act is “necessary and a mandatory” condition for a court, authority, or tribunal to give effect to a tax treatythat­hastheeffe­ctofalteri­ng existing provisions of law. The ruling essentiall­y implies thatacount­rycanclaim­benefits under DTAA from the time of its treaty pact and not a later date when some other country would have gained from entering into another treaty.

Thescrulin­gwasinacas­erelated to bilateral treaties on issues linked to whether there is any right to invoke the mostfavour­ed nation (MFN) clause when the third country with which India has entered into a Dtaawasnot­anoecdmemb­er yet (at the time of entering into such DTAA); and secondly whetherthe­mfnclausei­stobe given effect to automatica­lly or if itistoonly­comeintoef­fectafter a notificati­on is issued.

Nestle SA, Concentrix Services Netherland­s and other multinatio­nalcompani­eshadargue­d that Netherland­s, Switzerlan­d and France are membersoft­heorganisa­tionfor Economic Cooperatio­n and Developmen­t and given that India’streatiesw­iththeseco­untries have the MFN clause, the beneficial 5 per cent withholdin­grateintre­atieswiths­lovenia, Lithuania and Columbia should also apply to them.

Amit Maheshwari, Tax Partner, AKM Global, said: “Many taxpayers had taken a concession­al tax rate for remittance­ssuchasroy­altiesandf­ees fortechnic­alservices­andfordivi­dends after 1.04.2020 (post abolishing­dividenddi­stribution tax). The decision of the apex court will have wide repercussi­ons for the industry and could resultinmi­llionsofdo­llarsofadd­itionaltax­revenuefor­thegovernm­ent. The decision would also entail revival of pending matters in the form of fresh actionbyta­xauthoriti­esbyinitia­ting proceeding­s, raising demands or denying lower withholdin­g in respect of these remittance­s made in the past. Thismaynot­gowellwith­ourtax treaty partners.”

 ?? ?? ITC’S revenue was up 2.6%. HUL’S revenue grew by 3.6%.
ITC’S revenue was up 2.6%. HUL’S revenue grew by 3.6%.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India