Getting around a boycott

An ‘India Out’ campaign in Bangladesh jeopardises joint projects. People-to-people connections, liberalised visa regime, can help show a way out

BANGLADESH’S LOCATION AND India’s role in its independence have established the “India factor” as a powerful discourse in its domestic politics. The emergence of an “India Out” campaign on social media that advocates the boycott of Indian products with hashtags such as #Indiaout, #Boycottindia comes as a reaction to that.

From Maulana Abdul Hamid Khan Bhashani to the present-day opposition alliance led by Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), there have been instances of antiindia stands throughout Bangladesh’s history. Bhashani was pro-china and believed in a model of Islamic socialism. He criticised Sheikh Mujibur Rahman for making Bangladesh a satellite of India and tried to forge a coalition of the right and left extremists against the Awami League (AL). The BNP, which represents the right-ofcentre forces, has an orthodox social constituency inspired by Bhashani. The party is remotely controlled by its acting chairperson Tarique Rahman, Khaleda Zia’s son, from London where he is in exile.

The BNP’S stance can be seen as an attempt to gain political momentum given its steady decline since 2006. Boycotting the elections of 2014 and 2024 has contributed to a loss of BNP’S political influence and organisational strength in the country. It might be one of the reasons why some of its leadership, including Ruhul Rizvi and Amir Khasru Mahmud Chowdhury, seems to be supporting the Boycott India movement, even though the party itself has not come out with an official statement. Rizvi publicly threw away his Kashmiri shawl and called for the boycott of Indian products in front of the party’s central office in Dhaka’s Nayapaltan.

On the other hand, Sheikh Hasina’s track record has been strong when it comes to the economic performance of the country over the last decade. Bangladesh is expected to become a middle-income country by 2041 while it is on track to graduate from the Least Developed Countries list in 2026. Bangladesh finds itself above average on the parameters of the Human Development Index compared to other South Asian countries.

According to the World Bank, Indian exports to Bangladesh were valued around $324 million in 1991. This, interestingly, increased to $868 million in 1996 during the first tenure of the BNP. Similarly, during its second tenure, in 2001, the export from India was around $1.06 billion, which increased to $1.66 billion in 2006.

A close economic partnership between India and Bangladesh has been one of the factors behind Bangladesh’s prosperity. India’s proximity to Bangladesh translates into a natural trade advantage. Shared land borders and well-established transportation links facilitate the movement of goods, often at lower costs compared to imports from more distant locations like China. India is Bangladesh’s second-largest import source, with a staggering $13.69 billion worth of goods entering the Bangladeshi market in 2021-22.

A dominant theme in India’s exports to Bangladesh is the supply chain for the textile industry. Bangladesh’s garment manufacturing sector, a key driver of its economic growth, relies heavily on raw materials and intermediate goods from India. In 2022, non-retail pure cotton yarn and raw cotton (20.1 per cent of total import) were among India’s top imports. These materials are transformed into yarn and fabric in Bangladeshi factories before being used to manufacture garments for domestic consumption as well as for exports.

While textiles reign supreme, India also supplies Bangladesh refined petroleum which is crucial for powering industries and transportation. Other significant imports include pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and machinery, highlighting the multifaceted nature of this trade relationship. Recently, India exported 50,000 tonnes of onion to Bangladesh ahead of Ramzan, an exception to the export ban on the crop in December 2023. This is apart from essential commodities such as garlic, coconut oil and spices. There have also been instances of informal trade between the two countries, crucial in stabilising inflation in Bangladesh.

India is a major supplier of construction materials to Bangladesh for infrastructure development. The supply of diesel locomotives, double and single-decker buses, steel coaches, highway duty trucks under Indian Government’s Line of Credit had improved transportation, work efficiency and office capacity in Bangladesh. The loss-incurring Bangladesh Road Transport Corporation (BRTC) is turning profit-making with the supply of new tracks from India.

An intensification of the India Out campaign stands to derail all of these as well as the on-going negotiations on the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) between India and Bangladesh. AL leaders, including Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, have argued that if the boycott campaign is steadfast, even “garam masala, onions, garlic, ginger and all spices that come from India should not be seen in their (BNP leaders’) homes”.

The educated and moderate younger generation of Bangladeshis consider development as the core of political and diplomatic actions. This cohort is keen to be a partner in the process of economic growth and development and is not sceptical of an alliance with India. This generation has given a massive mandate to the Al-led alliance since 2008, giving hope that in the age of global is at ion and commercial is at ion, boycotting of products is an obsolete idea.

However, the two governments must also actively work to inspire trust and confidence among citizens. This can be done by promoting people-to-people contact, sensitising the media in both countries and liberalising the visa regime. All of these will come in handy to maintain the Indiabangladesh development partnership.

An intensification of the

India Out campaign stands to derail the on-going negotiations on the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) between India and Bangladesh. The educated and moderate younger generation of Bangladeshis consider development as the core of political and diplomatic actions. This cohort is keen to be a partner in the process of economic growth and development and is not sceptical of an alliance with India.

C R Sasikumar