The Indian Express (Delhi Edition)

In Tharoor bastion, Rajeev mixes change pitch with Modi theme

-

before the crowds that the stage was set for the Modi government 3.0 and that he would be a minister in it.

Kicking off the day's campaign at Kannammool­a, senior BJP leader P K Krishnadas said, “If we ensure Chandrasek­har’s victory, Modi ji would certainly make him a member of his Cabinet. If (Congress candidate) Shashi Tharoor or (CPI candidate) Pannian Ravindran is elected, they would hold sit-ins in Delhi and will never bring any developmen­t to Thiruvanan­thapuram. We want Chandrasek­har to bring in change in this constituen­cy.”

Although the roadshow was running behind the schedule, people waited for Chandrasek­har for long hours despite the current festivals at local temples. At some receptions, the BJP candidate did not even speak. “People from all sections are attending his reception. Everyone expects that he will become a minister in the next Modi government,’’ said Ravi, a resident of Mannamoola in the city.

The entreprene­ur-turnedpoli­tician Chandrasek­har, 59, has turned the T hi ru van ant ha pu ram face-off as one of the most keen ly contested battles in Kerala this time, even though the BJP has never been able to win a Lok Sabha seat in the state. The constituen­cy has been the stronghold of three-term Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, the UN diplomat-turnedpoli­tician, who has been winning it since 2009, becoming its longest-serving MP so far.

The LDF’S nominee Pannian Ravindran, the 78year-old CPI leader, had won the seat in 2005 in a bypoll. Since 2014, the BJP has been the runner-up in T hi ru van ant ha pu ram, pushing the LDF to the third place. In the 2019 polls, Tharoor had trounced the BJP’S Kummanam Rajasekhar­an by nearly one lakh votes.

Apart from the Modi factor, Chandrasek­har's plank is centred on his agenda for change, as he spells out various ideas related to sectors ranging from agricultur­e to technology for ushering in a new wave of developmen­t in T hi ru van ant ha pu ram.

Tharoor exudes confidence about the prospects of his fourth term as he showcases his 15-year track record in his campaignin­g across the constituen­cy.

Pitted against two highprofil­e rivals, Ravindran tells the electorate: “The state capital requires a vishwasikk­avunna powran, not vishwa powran (a trustworth­y person, not a global citizen)”, as he projects his local commoner image against “a private jet-flying multi-billionair­e and another billionair­e”. He also underlines the Left's opposition to the CAA and its fight against Hindutva.

Last week, Chandrasek­har went into a huddle with various profession­al groups in the city, including engineers, doctors and technocrat­s, to work out his strategy against Tharoor, whose vote bank comprises a large section from the aspiration­al middle class, including youths and profession­als, besides the Congress's core support base. In the past three elections, the BJP and the Left candidates did not have an answer to Tharoor's appeal among the middle class, which Chandrasek­har is now attempting to wean through his outreach and pledges.

Conceding that he faces challenge from Chandrasek­har, Tharoor said, “The NDA'S campaignin­g is energetic and profession­al. If people are hearing that, we must counter it. Nobody can deny the developmen­t I have brought in the last 15 years. The national highway developmen­t, Vizhinjam seaport and IT developmen­t. I speak about the future of the country.”

The Congress also complained to the EC that there were “discrepanc­ies” in Chandrasek­har's poll affidavit abouthista­xableincom­ein202122. As per his tax returns, his income in the 2022-23 was Rs 5,59,200, while it was only Rs 680 in 2021-22.

Chandrasek­har rejected the allegation, asserting that his income in 2021-22 fell to that level following his business losses due to the Covid-19 pandemic. His clarificat­ion came after the EC directed the I-T department to verify any mismatch in the BJP candidate's affidavit.

Meanwhile, the BJP, in its complaint to the EC, stated that Tharoor accused Chandrasek­har of allegedly offering money to voters and religious leaders. Chandrasek­har rejected the allegation. The EC has also warned Tharoor not to make unverified allegation­s in contravent­ion of the Model Code of Conduct.

Thiruvanan­thapuram has a mix of urban, coastal and rural voters. The electorate comprises 68% Hindus, 19% Christians and 13% Muslims. All the three leading candidates, Tharoor, Chandrasek­har and Ravindran, belong to the upper caste Nair community, which makes up a significan­t chunk among the Hindu voters. The Nair outfit Nair Service Society's general secretary G Sukumaran Nair has thrown his weight behind Tharoor, although the allegiance of the community members seems to be split between the three parties.

The votes of the Christian and Muslim communitie­s would be crucial in the seat. The Christian community living in the coastal belt has had some resentment against the Cpm-led LDF as well as the BJP dispensati­on over the Adani group’s Vizhinjam project.

A seller of puja items at Parassala, Rajesh, says the contest would be mainly between Tharoor and Chandrasek­har. “Left is doing the best ground-level activity, but people are not happy with the state government's performanc­e. Tharoor has been here for 15 years. People don't say Tharoor has not performed, but a section of them may look for a change. At the same time, even Hindus here whom I meet express their concerns over the Manipur violence,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India