The Sunday Guardian

Trump targets oBama’s immigrants

The Trump administra­tion has moved to reopen the cases of hundreds of illegal immigrants.

- NEW YORK, WASHIGTON DC REUTERS

In September 2014, Gilberto Velasquez, a 38-year-old house painter from El Salvador, received life-changing news: The US government had decided to shelve its deportatio­n action against him.

The move was part of a policy change initiated by then-President Barack Obama in 2011 to pull back from deporting immigrants who had formed deep ties in the United States and whom the government considered no threat to public safety. Instead, the administra­tion would prioritize illegal immigrants who had committed serious crimes.

Last month, t hings changed again for the painter, who has lived in the United States illegally since 2005 and has a U.S.-born child. He received news that the government wanted to put his deportatio­n case back on the court calendar, citing another shift in priorities, this time by President Donald Trump.

The Trump administra­tion has moved to reopen the cases of hundreds of illegal immigrants who, like Velasquez, had been given a reprieve from deportatio­n, according to government data and court documents reviewed by Reuters and interviews with immigratio­n lawyers.

Trump signalled in January that he planned to dramatical­ly widen the net of illegal immigrants targeted for deportatio­n, but his administra­tion has not publicized its efforts to reopen immigratio­n cases.

It represents one of the first concrete examples of the crackdown promised by Trump and is likely to stir fears among tens of thousands of illegal immigrants who thought they were safe from deportatio­n.

While cases were reopened during the Obama administra­tion as well, it was generally only if an immigrant had committed a serious crime, immigratio­n attorneys say. The Trump administra­tion has sharply increased the number of cases it is asking the courts to reopen, and its targets appear to include at least some people who have not committed any crimes since their cases were closed.

Between March 1 and May 31, prosecutor­s moved to reopen 1,329 cases, according to a Reuters’ analysis of data from the Executive Office for Immigratio­n Review, or EOIR. The Obama administra­tion filed 430 similar motions during the same period in 2016.

Jennifer Elzea, a spokeswoma­n for US Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t, confirmed the agency was now filing motions with immigratio­n courts to reopen cases where illegal immigrants had “since been arrested for or convicted of a crime.”

It is not possible to tell from the EOIR data how many of the cases the Trump administra­tion is seeking to reopen involve immigrants who committed crimes after their cases were closed.

Attorneys interviewe­d by Reuters say indeed some of the cases being reopened are because immigrants were arrested for serious crimes, but they are also seeing cases involving people who haven’t committed crimes or who were cited for minor violations, like traffic tickets.

“This is a sea change, said attorney David Leopold, former president of the Ameri- can Immigratio­n Lawyers Associatio­n. “Before, if someone did something after the case was closed out that showed that person was a threat, then it would be reopened. Now they are opening cases just because they want to deport people.”

Elzea said the agency reviews cases, “to see if the basis for prosecutor­ial discretion is still appropriat­e.”

After Obama announced his shift toward targeting illegal immigrants who had committed serious crimes, prosecutor­s embraced their new discretion to close cases.

Between January 2012 and Trump’s inaugurati­on on Jan. 20, the government shelved some 81,000 cases, according to Reuters’ data analysis. These so- called “administra­tive closures” did not extend full legal status to those whose cases were closed, but they did remove the threat of imminent deportatio­n.

Trump signed an executive order overturnin­g the Obama-era policy on Jan. 25. Under the new guidelines, while criminals remain the highest priority for deportatio­n, anyone in the country illegally is a potential target.

In cases reviewed by Reuters, the administra­tion explicitly cited Trump’s executive order in 30 separate motions as a reason to put the immigrant back on the court docket. Since immigratio­n cases aren’t generally public, Reuters was able to review only cases made available by attorneys.

In the 32 reopened cases examined by Reuters:

22 involved immigrants who, according to their attorneys, had not been in trouble with the law since their cases were closed.

--Two of the cases involved serious crimes committed after their cases were closed: domestic violence and driv- ing under the influence.

--At least six of the cases involved minor infraction­s, including speeding after having unpaid traffic tickets, or driving without a valid license, according to the attorneys.

In Velasquez’s case, for example, he was cited for driving without a license in Tennessee, where illegal immigrants cannot get licenses, he said.

“I respect the law and just dedicate myself to my work,” he said. “I don’t understand why this is happening.”

Motions to reopen closed cases have been filed in 32 states, with the highest numbers in California, Florida and Virginia, according to Reuters’ review of EOIR data. The bulk of the examples reviewed by Reuters were two dozen motions sent over the span of a couple days by the New Orleans ICE office.

 ?? REUTERS ?? An Iraqi man (C) is ordered to raise his hands for a check as civilians displaced by fighting between the Iraqi forces and ISIS flee the al-Zanjili district in Mosul, Iraq on Saturday.
REUTERS An Iraqi man (C) is ordered to raise his hands for a check as civilians displaced by fighting between the Iraqi forces and ISIS flee the al-Zanjili district in Mosul, Iraq on Saturday.
 ??  ?? Trump signalled in January that he planned to dramatical­ly widen the net of illegal immigrants targeted for deportatio­n.
Trump signalled in January that he planned to dramatical­ly widen the net of illegal immigrants targeted for deportatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India