The Sunday Guardian

Russia’s disinforma­tion about Covid-19 is itself a dangerous virus

- JOHN DOBSON LONDON

In a world struggling to survive the onslaught of the invisible enemy, the Kremlin is pumping up its disinforma­tion, inspired by coronaviru­s. In a report this week, the European Union charged the Russian pro-kremlin media of stoking “confusion, panic and fear”, part of a broader strategy to “subvert European societies from within”. It claims that the overarchin­g aim of Kremlin disinforma­tion is to aggravate the public health crisis in western countries, specifical­ly by underminin­g public trust in national healthcare systems. The sinister objective of the disinforma­tion is to prevent an effective response to the outbreak, damaging government­s in the eyes of their citizens.

Russia has always denied previous allegation­s by western government­s and intelligen­ce agencies of using disinforma­tion or opinion-forming campaigns. But when the evidence is literally in black and white in news outlets funded directly by Moscow, such denials hold little water.

While much of Russian propaganda and misinforma­tion is aimed at the West, it’s also directed at its domestic audience in order to bolster its own regime and whip up antiwester­n sentiment. Finding a Western hand behind all of Russia’s misfortune and failures is a common theme used by the Russian government to evade responsibi­lity, as well as to raise nationalis­t spirits.

Take a look at the 22 January edition of Sputnik, the Russian news agency. This used to be known as the “Voice of Russia” and is based in Moscow, with outlets in India, Beijing and many western capitals. As it was created by an Executive Order of the President of Russia on 9 December 2013, it’s safe to assume that its voice is authentica­lly that of the Kremlin.

The conspiracy theory in this edition of Sputnik attempts to cast a shadow over US/NATO as the likely creators of the new virus, used to the pursuit of their political and economic aims. Sputnik claims that there are many American and NATO biological laboratori­es surroundin­g China from which the coronaviru­s escaped, thus blaming China for it. As proof, Sputnik refers to old posters released by China with headlines such as “Everyone to struggle with American bacteriolo­gical aggression”. Russia repeatedly sides with China in the coronaviru­s disinforma­tion war, claiming that this biological weapon has been deployed by America to stop China’s rise.

On 18 March, the popular Russian online site aimed at Russian subscriber­s, Medialeaks,

categorica­lly asserted that Covid-19 was created by a US laboratory in 2015. As “proof:, it quotes an unpublishe­d and dubious study by researcher­s from the University of North Carolina and Wuhan Institute of Virology. Linking coronaviru­s to the US and its stock of biological weapons is a recurring pro-kremlin disinforma­tion narrative.

A week later, in an attempt to justify the type of society President Putin is creating in Russia, Medialeaks claimed that “only authoritar­ian states and closed societies will be able to protect their population­s from the coronaviru­s and from future pandemics”. The Russian economy is currently in deep trouble with the collapse of the oil price and raw materials, amounting to 60% of its GDP. So what better than use survival against the coronaviru­s as an argument in favour of a post-globalist and closed society? Exactly the authoritar­ian society being promoted by President Putin, the saviour of the nation. Of course, Medialeaks failed to mention that it was an authoritar­ian state, China, which suppressed informatio­n about the virus, censored and detained those doctors and whistleblo­wers who attempted to sound the alarm and warn their fellow citizens when they understood the gravity of the coronaviru­s threat.

One of President Putin’s strategic aims is to weaken European solidarity, so it’s not surprising to see a number of disinforma­tion outlets indulging in apocalypti­c scenarios. For example, on 15 March, the influentia­l Russian national TV news channel Rossiya 24 carried a long feature at prime time on the “collapse” of the EU Schengen zone, the eliminatio­n of borders between most EU nations. This theme was also taken up the same day by the Kremlin-owned TV channel Russia Today, broadcasti­ng across the West. Both used the closing of borders as proof that this was the first step towards the abandoning of the Union in favour of rebuilding Europe’s nation states. Both concluded that the European idea had collapsed and coronaviru­s was the start of a transition to different political cultures. The collapse of the European Union is a constant pro-kremlin narrative. The programme failed to mention that the Schengen border code is explicitly designed to allow a temporary relaxation of free movement where there is a serious threat to public policy or internal security, as in the case of the coronaviru­s. The EU has made it perfectly clear that all borders will reopen once the pandemic is over, something not mentioned by either Russia Today or Rossyia 24.

On a similar theme, the prokremlin website aimed at Russian citizens, Rubaltic.ru, also reflected on the imminent collapse of the EU. Remarkably, it claimed that coronaviru­s will be to NATO and the EU what Chernobyl was to the Soviet Union. Chernobyl was the prelude to the collapse of the Soviet Union, so the corollary is that coronaviru­s will cause the collapse of the EU! No evidence was provided for this extraordin­ary claim, and no mention was made of the 37 billion euro EU initiative to provide liquidity to small businesses and the health care sector in the Eurozone.

The Baltic states have long been considered to be the most likely flashpoint for conflict in the future. It’s, therefore, not surprising that a huge amount of disinforma­tion is focused on Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. All three countries moved quickly to join both the EU and NATO after the collapse of the Soviet Union and still have large Russianspe­aking population­s. The Russian website Rubaltica. ru is popular among these and the Kremlin sees it as the natural vehicle for propaganda and disinforma­tion. On 19 March, the website argued that the Baltic States cannot survive the economic shock of the coronaviru­s pandemic. The site claims that EU experts are emphatic that the Baltic States will face an enormous economic blow, substantia­lly worse than the 2008-09 financial crisis. The coronaviru­s crisis will completely erase the whole postsoviet developmen­t model of the Baltic States, an economic shock so severe that their future is best served by returning to Russia. The website failed to note that, although times will be hard in the Baltic States, once the pandemic is over their citizens will still be substantia­lly wealthier than their Russian neighbours.

Taken individual­ly, many of these false claims can often seem unbelievab­le. But that’s not how Russian disinforma­tion works. Russia is behind swarms of online false personas, spreading disinforma­tion about a myriad of topics, not just coronaviru­s, although this is the latest subject. These outlets are not attempting to “sell” an idea, but rather confuse the audience by scattering deceit. By spreading disinforma­tion about coronaviru­s, Russian aspersive actors are choosing to threaten public safety by distractin­g from the global health response. This is dangerous. Russian disinforma­tion is itself a virus against which the world must be vaccinated.

John Dobson is a former British diplomat to Moscow and worked in UK Prime Minister John Major’s Office between 1995 and 1998.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India