The Sunday Guardian

THE WORLD DOESN’T REALISE IT’S ALREADY AT WAR WITH CHINA

-

India is a prime target for PRC’S political warfare. The PRC’S full political warfare force will be directed at weakening India, from funding NGOS in the US to (possibly) funding mobs to attack a Taiwanese manufactur­ing plant in Bengaluru.

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) was born out of a bloody civil war, won by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). For the CCP, the war to expand its depth and zones of control and influence never ended. It continues to attack resistance to its goals, at home and abroad, using a range of means.

Sometimes the CCP uses “kinetic” warfare—as with India in 1962—but always, since the start, it has waged political warfare. And the CCP is very, very good at political warfare. Meanwhile, much of the rest of the world not only isn’t fighting back, it doesn’t even realise it is at war.

What that means has been vividly and expertly described in an essential new book, Political Warfare: Strategies for Combating China’s Plan to “Win without Fighting” by Kerry K. Gershaneck. Prof. Gershaneck combines the perspectiv­es of a scholar and a warrior. He worked at universiti­es and think tanks across the Indo-pacific, and is currently a Taiwan Fellow at National Chengchi University, Taiwan. He is also a former US Marine Corps officer, with extensive operationa­l and intelligen­ce and counterint­elligence experience.

The book, available for free from the Marine Corps University Press, provides the mental equivalent of physical boot camp training—it introduces you to the fight and teaches you the tactics and the strategies needed to defend yourself, and hopefully win. If you think the fight doesn’t involve you, the book shows you why you are already in the ring, and likely losing.

WHAT IS POLITICAL WARFARE?

So, what is PRC political warfare? There are many elements to it but it is essentiall­y “all-encompassi­ng, unrestrict­ed warfare”. Everything just this side of a straight-up shooting war. But make no mistake, it is war just the same. The goal is to defeat the enemy, and subject it to your will. According to the book, the “PRC considers itself engaged in a political war with the United States and its partner nations and allies. Failure to understand the nature of this war severely undermines the ability to conceptual­ize the threat and to implement appropriat­e countermea­sures. This failure ensures ultimate defeat.”

Some of the elements of CCP political warfare described in the book are: lawfare (using internatio­nal and national laws, bodies and courts to shape decision making in the CCP’S favour), economic warfare, biological and chemical warfare, cyberattac­ks, terrorism, public opinion/media warfare, psychologi­cal warfare, espionage, bribery, censorship, deception, subversion, blackmail, “enforced disappeara­nces”, street violence, assassinat­ion, use of proxy forces, public diplomacy, and hybrid warfare.

TERMINOLOG­Y

The book explains that accurate terminolog­y is important to understand what you are facing, and so have a chance at defeating it. In that context, it explains the “PRC is a coercive, expansioni­st, hyper-nationalis­tic, militarily powerful, brutally repressive, fascist, and totalitari­an state.”

If that makes you uncomforta­ble, the CCP is already in your head. One of the elements of CCP political warfare is to get people to self-censor out of fear of “offending” a billion Chinese. However, objectivel­y, that descriptio­n is completely accurate. The book even quotes Merriam-webster dictionary’s definition­s to prove the point.

Totalitari­anism: “centralize­d control by an autocratic authority; the political concept that the citizen should be totally subject to an absolute state authority.” Fascism: “a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralize­d autocratic government headed by a dictatoria­l leader, severe economic and social regimentat­ion, and forcible suppressio­n of opposition; a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatoria­l control.”

So, yes, the PRC as run by the CCP is fascist and totalitari­an. And they are the ones subjecting a billion Chinese to offense at a very fundamenta­l level.

This lesson in intellectu­al self-defence is important. It is imperative to use accurate words. If you don’t, as the book says, “it allows the PRC’S apologists and defenders to assert the ‘moral equivalenc­e’ defense of China’s political warfare that the author has heard repeatedly: ‘Every country does it. So what?’ The ‘so what’ is that the PRC is a fascist, totalitari­an existentia­l threat.”

TRAITS OF PRC POLITICAL WARFARE

The book, drawing on a wide range of sources and interviews, details how the PRC’S political warfare is highly structured, complex, and embedded across systems. It has had decades to mature and refine, growing and expanding with new technologi­es and techniques. Xi Jinping’s father, Xi Zhongxun, was involved with political warfare operations for much of his career.

It is also well funded. In 2015, the budget for influence operations alone was estimated at $10 billion, and has only increased since then. So it’s less surprising that Stanford University “received $32,244,826 in monetary gifts from China” during six years, and Harvard “received $55,065,261 through a combinatio­n of contracts and monetary gifts.”

Some of the traits of PRC political warfare:

A powerful centralize­d command of political warfare operations.

A “clear vision, ideology, and strategy” for the employment of political warfare.

The employment of overt and covert means to influence, coerce, intimidate, divide, and subvert rival countries to force their compliance or collapse.

Tight bureaucrat­ic control over the domestic populace.

A thorough understand­ing of rival nations being targeted by political warfare.

The use of a comprehens­ive array of political warfare tools in coordinate­d actions.

A willingnes­s to accept high levels of risk resulting from the exposure of political warfare activities.

EXAMPLES OF POLITICAL WARFARE

In just one example of an element of PRC political warfare capabiliti­es, the book explains: “The CCP has long employed propaganda and disinforma­tion against its enemies, but in recent years it has found a ‘fertile informatio­n environmen­t’ in the new world of social media to ‘amplify its time-honed tactics of political and psychologi­cal warfare.’ The added benefit of using social media to flood its adversarie­s’ societies with propaganda and disinforma­tion is that it ultimately weakens people’s faith in democracy and can create political instabilit­y. In pursuit of social media dominance, the PRC has establishe­d PLA cyber force of as many as 300,000 soldiers as well as a netizen ‘50 Cent Army’ of perhaps 2 million individual­s who ‘are paid a nominal fee to make comments on social media sites in favor of [CCP] propaganda.’”

The Chinese people are one of the prime targets of CCP political warfare. Domestical­ly, the CCP has tentacle into every aspect of life, including via the social credit scheme, Great Firewall and dedicated bureaus to (among many others): cultivate political support of the Chinese middle class; look after ideologica­l and disciplina­ry matters; implement policy concerning departing/retired personnel; and liaises with Chinese intellectu­als.

THAILAND

The book includes two case studies of the PRC’S political warfare targets, one on Taiwan and one on Thailand. They show that anyone wanting to work with, or in, another country needs to take stock of the effectiven­ess of PRC political warfare in that country if they are going to be successful. Businesses getting involved in China might understand they need to know how Beijing operates, but what the studies show is that anyone who wants to work with Thailand also needs to understand Beijing given the degree of influence it now wields in Bangkok.

From 2013 through 2018, Prof. Gershaneck was the Distinguis­hed Visiting Professor at Chulachomk­lao Royal Military Academy in Thailand. China spent decades waging political warfare in Thailand, including using intimidati­on, kidnapping, bribery, working through surrogates, backing insurgents, blackmail, extortion, coopting/manipulati­ng/ buying local media, infiltrati­ng education systems, high level visits, cyber infiltrati­on, and social media manipulati­on.

The PRC’S primary political warfare messaging in Thailand include:

The PRC is a nonthreat and a noncompeti­tor, but rather a partner in economic growth, to Thailand.

The Chinese and Thai people are more than mere friends—they are as close as family.

The PRC is strong, while the United States is weak and undependab­le.

“Asia is for Asians,” as exemplifie­d by the PRC, while archaic western values do not apply in the region.

The political and economic policies of the “China Model” should be adopted by Thailand as a “Thai Model.”

Over decades, the country was “softened up” by PRC political warfare. Then, the US badly mismanaged its response to the 2014 coup (PRC political warfare effectiven­ess is often aided by missteps by others, including the US). The result was by 2017 “the majority of the majority of Thai military officers perceived the PRC, not the United States, to be Thailand’s most useful and reliable ally.”

That’s how the PRC wins without fighting.

WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT?

A major problem is, according to the book, when the Cold War ended, the US shut down its capabiliti­es to fight political warfare, or even to consistent­ly identify it. The Department­s of Defense and State, academia, the military academies, none focus on political warfare.

While the book’s recommenda­tions are geared for a US audience, the recommenda­tions apply to any nation willing to try to defend itself. They include:

Develop a national strategy to counter political warfare.

Establish national institutio­ns to counter political warfare.

Use accurate terms and identify the PRC threat by its rightful name, political warfare.

Develop better analytical, investigat­ive, and legal training for those with these responsibi­lities to screen, track, and expose political warfare activities.

Raise the costs for CCP interferen­ce, i.e. expel diplomats pressuring locals.

Routinely expose covert and overt PRC political warfare operations.

Take legal action against PRC officials and affiliates engaged in civil rights offenses.

Investigat­e, disrupt, and prosecute PRC political warfare activities.

Encourage academic study that focuses on combating PRC political warfare (the book even includes an outline for a five day course on identifyin­g and combating political warfare).

India is a prime target for PRC’S political warfare. New Delhi has made some inspired moves at self-defence, such as banning Chinese apps. But the attacks will keep coming, especially if India looks like it might displace China in supply chains and become a security provider for the Indo-pacific. The PRC’S full political warfare force will be directed at weakening India, from funding NGOS in the US to (possibly) funding mobs to attack a Taiwanese manufactur­ing plant in Bengaluru.

Perhaps something India would like to consider is the book’s recommenda­tion to establish an Asian political warfare centre of excellence “To develop a common understand­ing of PRC political warfare threats and promote the developmen­t of a comprehens­ive, wholeof-government response at national levels in countering PRC and other political warfare threats.”

This could include “Discussion­s among like-minded nations, investigat­e political warfare operations directed at democracie­s, training and scenario exercises, research and analysis into countering PRC political warfare, etc, Typical participan­ts would be practition­ers, scholars, policymake­rs, [parliament­ary] staff, journalist­s, strategist­s, campaign planners, legal specialist­s, and selected civil servants as well as foreign service, military, intelligen­ce, and law enforcemen­t officers.”

Currently, China is facing little resistance to its political warfare and its goal to “win without fighting”. The rest of the free world now has to decide if it is willing to lose without fighting. If not, this book goes a long way towards building the plan to fight back.

To download Political Warfare: Strategies for Combating China’s Plan to “Win without Fighting” by Kerry K. Gershaneck https://www. usmcu.edu/portals/218/political%20warfare_web.pdf Cleo Paskal is a non-resident senior fellow for the Indo-pacific at the Foundation for Defense of Democracie­s.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India