The Sunday Guardian

AN ASSOCIATIO­N OF CORPORATE BODIES CAN ESTABLISH A CAPTIVE POWER PLANT PRIMARILY FOR THEIR OWN USE: SUPREME COURT

- PRANSHI AGARWAL

The Supreme Court in the case Chhattisga­rh State

Power Distributi­on Company Ltd. vs Chhattisga­rh

State Electricit­y Regulatory Commission observed that a captive power plant primarily for their own

use can be establishe­d by an associatio­n of corporate bodies.

The requiremen­t would be that the consumptio­n of SBIPL and SBMPL together should not be less than

51% of the power generated. Admittedly, the joint consumptio­n by SBIPL and

SBMPL is more than 51% and under the provisions of the said Act, the use of electricit­y by it would be

for captive use only even an associatio­n of corporate bodies can establish a power plant. Since SBMPL

holds 27.6% of the ownership, the requiremen­t of not less than 26% of shares is fulfilled by SBMPL as SBMPL holds 27.6% equity shares in SBPIL.

The fourth proviso to subsection (2) of Section 42 of

the said Act would also reveal that surcharge would not be leviable in case open access is provided to a person who has establishe­d a captive generating plant for carrying the electricit­y to

the destinatio­n of his own use and under Section 9 of the said Act, could be an

individual or a body corporate or associatio­n or body of individual­s, whether incorporat­ed or not, it is clear that the person will get

benefit even an associatio­n of corporate bodies can establish a captive power

plant it has been seen. The definition of “person” is

wide enough to include any company or body corporate or associatio­n or body of individual­s, whether

incorporat­ed or not, or artificial juridical person it should be primarily for the

use of the members of such cooperativ­e society or associatio­n is the requiremen­t,

the Bench observed while referring to the provisions of the Electricit­y Act.

The BPIL, the respondent contended and supported the impugned judgment that no permission is required from the Commission for supply of electricit­y for its own use. Thereafter the appellant Company contended that unless SBPIL consumes 51% of the aggregate electricit­y generated by it, it will not be entitled to get the benefit under

Section 9 of the said Act, in an appeal filled before the Apex Court.

An appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricit­y filed by

the Company further The Commission held that SBPIL was entitled to supply electricit­y to its sister concern SBMPL and the

same would qualify to be treating as own consumptio­n and within the ambit of Section 9 read with Section 2(8) of the Electricit­y Act, 2003 and Rule 3 of the Electricit­y Rules, 2005 SBPIL submitted a petition

for providing open access and wheeling of power

through the transmissi­on system of the Chhattisga­rh

State Power Distributi­on Company Ltd (Company) for captive use by SBMPL to the Chhattisga­rh State Electricit­y Regulatory Commission, the commission. A Captive Generation Plant is establishe­d by

SBPIL, and is a sister concern of SBPIL Shri Bajrang Power and I spat Ltd and

Shri Bajrang Metallics and Power Ltd, SBMPL.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India