The Sunday Guardian

SC FILES A PLEA, SHARIAT ACT DISCRIMINA­TORY TOWARDS MUSLIM WOMEN, GIVES HIGHER SHARE TO MEN IN PROPERTY PARTITION

- CORRESPOND­ENT

The Supreme Court in the case Bushara Ali v. Irfan Ahammed & Ors observed and has filed a plea wherein it is contended that the partition of family property as per Shariat Law is discrimina­tory towards Muslim women in as much as the female are not given equal share as compared to a male.

In the present case, the Muslim women are subjected to discrimina­tion, in spite of guarantee of the Constituti­on. The petition is moved by Bushara Ali states as she being a decree holder in a partition suit whereby she was only been allotted ½ the shares as of her the male counterpar­ts. However, Bushara has also been allotted 7/152 shares in her ancestral property whereas her male counterpar­ts were being granted 14/152 shares. Before the court, it has been challenged by her that Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Applicatio­n Act, 1937 as being violative of Article 15 of the Constituti­on of India. Thus, the petition filed through Advocate Bijo Mathew Joy added that the Act is a pre-constituti­onal legislatur­e which would fall directly within the Article 13(1) of Constituti­on of India.

The division bench comprising of Justice Krishna Murari and Justice Sanjay Karol in the case observed and has issued notice in the matter.

Accordingl­y, the petition filed raised question of law as to whether Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Applicatio­n Act, 1937, which being to the extent for not giving equal share to a female as it is being compared to a male which being violative of Article 15 of the Constituti­on of India and therefore the same is void as per Article 13 of Constituti­on of India?

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India