The Sunday Guardian

Inclusive and expansive: A Bharatiya narrative for climate change

While the Western viewpoint often seeks to exert control over nature, the Indian perspectiv­e rejects human attempts to control nature.

- SANTISHREE DHULIPUDI PANDIT Prof Santishree Dhulipudi Pandit is the Vice-chancellor of JNU.

The Panchabhoo­ta Bharatiya narrative architectu­re for the ecosystem is holistic as it looks at human beings as a part of it in this naturecent­ric system, where chaos is creative and leads us to balance and harmony with the larger cosmos. This is in contrast to the hegemonic concept of conquering and destroying nature for the benefit of humans better known as anthropoce­ntricism. The concept of Devrai or sacred forests in India brought in sanctity to preservati­on and protection of biodiversi­ty and Mother Nature. They are the sacred wizards of conservati­on. This alternativ­e narrative needs to be constructe­d as the world faces a huge crisis of reckless developmen­t, leading us to calamity.

Bharatiya gyan parampara

wisdom has taught us to revere the Panchabhoo­tas and the Ecosystem. While growing up we are told by elders to never play with the Panchbhoot­as, for these natural forces, if disturbed, can engulf humans. Any disturbanc­es of this balance and harmony have had severe natural consequenc­es where humans have been shown as helpless against the forces of Nature or the Panchabhoo­tas. Nature is a great leveller.

Since the onset of industrial­isation, the climate has been steadily warming. Yet, the broader challenge lies in the uneven and flawed approach to addressing environmen­tal and climate issues worldwide. The current discourse on climate change comes from the West and is predominan­tly human-centric, thus often disregardi­ng and even opposing the intrinsic forces of nature and overlookin­g indigenous communitie­s. As the world grapples with increasing­ly severe and erratic weather events, three key points must be emphasised and understood.

Firstly, climate change and environmen­tal protection are not solely government­al or individual concerns but universal imperative­s. While it is the prerogativ­e of government­s to safeguard the environmen­t from degradatio­n and exploitati­on, it is equally incumbent upon citizens to contribute to its preservati­on. In essence, environmen­tal protection is both a top-down and bottom-up process. Many climate initiative­s tend to view it solely as a government­al responsibi­lity, holding government­s accountabl­e when ecological goals are not met. Undoubtedl­y, government­s bear a significan­t responsibi­lity, but what about the role of citizens?

Enter India, with its millennia of wisdom and a profound understand­ing of the interplay between humans and nature, characteri­sed by harmony rather than conflict. Indian constituti­onal thinkers demonstrat­ed foresight by including provisions for environmen­tal protection as far back as 1948-1950, long before modern environmen­tal concerns gained widespread recognitio­n in the 1960s-70s, notably with Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring.

Even today, government­al approaches in India reflect this deep understand­ing, evident in the arrangemen­ts made with tribal communitie­s and efforts to engage citizens in environmen­tal stewardshi­p. Initiative­s such as the Swachh Bharat campaign, the world’s largest of its kind, and integratin­g environmen­tal awareness into the Indian education system signify steps to elevate awareness of ecological concerns. These actions demonstrat­e a concerted effort to ensure that the locus of responsibi­lity is not solely limited to the government but that citizens are recognised as equal stakeholde­rs in environmen­tal preservati­on.

Secondly, environmen­tal discourse must adopt an inclusive approach. Herein lies the significan­ce of India’s tradition of Panchbhoot. The fundamenta­l constituen­ts of nature are rooted in the principles of Pancha Bhootas—land, water, air, soil, and fire. This perspectiv­e places humans not at the centre of the universe but rather as an integral part of nature’s ecosystem. While the Western viewpoint often seeks to exert control over nature, the Indian perspectiv­e rejects human attempts to control nature.

In Hinduism, for instance, sacred tree groves are revered, while Buddhism includes sacred deer parks. The concept of “sacred groves” extends beyond specific religious contexts to encompass natural habitats protected on religious grounds. References to sacred groves can be traced back to ancient treatises like Vrikshayur­veda and literary works such as Kalidasa’s Vikramorva­shiyam.

The five elements need to be elaborated. There is substantia­l scientific evidence to show that water has tremendous memory. Just generate a thought looking at the water, the molecular structure of the water will change. If one touches it, it will change. So how one approaches water is very important. Air or “vayu,” which means not just air as a mixture of nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide and other gases, but as a dimension of movement. Among the five elements, air is the most accessible and relatively the easiest element to gain reasonable mastery over. In Indian culture, the element of fire is personifie­d as Agni Deva, a god with two faces who rides on a fiery ram. The two faces are symbolic representa­tions of fire as a life-giver and a life-taker. Without the fire burning within us, there is no life. But if you do not take care, fire can quickly go out of control and consume everything. Akasha is not empty space, nor ether that is the closest translatio­n. It is subtle dimension of existence. Space is kala or nonexisten­ce; it is Shi-va that which is not and Akasha that which is.

Thirdly, there is a pressing need for more alternativ­e approaches to address climate change issues. It does not presuppose only the Indian approach but encourages local and regional approaches. With its rich tradition and historical context, India embodies an approach that can be encapsulat­ed as “Global in Scope, Local in Solutions”, which is a good starting point. Environmen­talists, philosophe­rs, and political leaders in India have advocated for developmen­t approaches, prioritisi­ng harmony over conflict with nature, reflecting a common thread in their thinking.

Integral humanism is one such example that offers insights into understand­ing environmen­tal issues and devising strategies for their resolution. Cooperatio­n is another theme where Indian traditions can provide valuable lessons to the world. India’s initiative­s, such as ethanol-blended and hydrogen fuels, exemplify a nuanced approach that eschews simplistic binary positions in favour of locally grounded solutions. Moreover, India is actively embracing and promoting the transition to renewables through global collaborat­ions like the Internatio­nal Solar Alliance and the recently launched Global Biofuel Alliance.

In light of the conflictin­g and competitiv­e climate change models prevalent in global politics, which often divide nations in the Global North vs Global South or Developed vs Developing countries, India’s Panchabhoo­ta framework emerges as a promising starting point for exploring alternativ­e approaches. It is a cosmos centric theory where everything in Nature has its role as well as humans which are in balance and harmony. Any disturbanc­e like the anthropoce­ntric approaches where conquering and destroying nature has brought us to where we are today of climate disasters and calamities. Hence this holistic and nature-centric Indic perspectiv­es underscore a profound connection with nature and the larger cosmos. Bharatiya gyan parampara offers a compelling framework for fostering collaborat­ion and collective action on a global scale.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India