Voice&Data

‘Mere R&D and creation of IPR will not result in 80% local production by 2020’

- Pravin Prashant

How is TEMA pushing the telecom manufactur­ing in the country?

In the last 3-4 months, we have realized that a lot needs to be done for inclusive growth in the telecom industry. In terms of statistics, we have mobile subscripti­ons of more than 800 mn, but as far as equipment manufactur­ing is concerned, we are virtually negligible. For example, the import of infrastruc­ture equipment is in the range of ` 50,000-` 60,000 crore whereas the Indian domestic manufactur­ing is in the range of ` 1,000 crore only.

Both in NTP’94 and NTP’99 policy, we find that the government was conscious about manufactur­ing of domestic products and it also talked about India becoming self-reliant in the telecom manufactur­ing and also catering to the whole world. NTP’11 is focused on R&D and manufactur­ing and it also talks about 30% local sourcing in the first year and gradually achieving 85% by 2020. This is all good, but the concern is that what is the roadmap to achieve it? By 2020, our import bill in telecom will become ` 250,000 crore and it will be 4 times the oil import bill. So, it is important to achieve our goals and do not miss out for any reason as it will leave us far behind.

How can we achieve 80% local production by 2020?

Mere R&D and mere creation of IPR will not result in 80% local production by 2020. R&D has to mix up with commercial­ization and the two has to go together. Therefore R&D will require special impetus and there should be carrot-and-stick policy. We at TEMA, are recommendi­ng 5% cess to be collected from the operators in India to boost R&D. At the same time the approach of carrot is that those buying local products will be granted this concession.

Another important aspect of achieving the desired goal is to provide market access, whereby in purchase of government hardware, preference should be given to domestic product. The government is utilizing USO fund for increasing teledensit­y and the caveat can be that domestic products will be deployed for USO projects. Support from the government is that it is discountin­g the disability factor which the Indian manufactur­er is ceased with and this is in the range of 14-15%. The cost of the fund in some countries are negligible or 2-3% and there is zero duty too. On the other hand, the Indian manufactur­er is posed with all sorts of taxes like municipal tax, octroi tax, and central sales tax (CST). So, the whole cost comes around 22%.

There is always an excuse that components are not available locally. So, how are we going to achieve 80% by 2020?

We are requesting DOT to depute a team to know how this system works and give further impetus. The need today for the government is to accelerate the speed with which decisions are taken or we will miss the bus. If we don’t act right now nothing will be left for manufactur­ing. Once the people realize that there is ` 250,000 crore opportunit­y and the government is promoting domestic manufactur­ing, many giants who are not focused in telecom will also jump.

pravinp@cybermedia.co.in

 ?? Ashok K Aggarwal ??
Ashok K Aggarwal
 ??  ?? INTERVIEW
INTERVIEW
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India