diVtance callV are almoVt identical and itV loVing tUe differential VUarply.
TUe ILM induVtry in India remained almoVt flatH or ratUer a negligible growtU of 0.27H during laVt fiVcal. TUe induVtry made 25H705 crore in FY 2011-12 compared to 25H637 crore in FY 2010-11. Among tUe top five ILM playerVH only Tata Comm and Vodafone could Uave Vome Ueadway in tUiV buVineVV laVt year. Tata Comm grew by 20% to cloVe itV bookV witU revenue of 13H744 crore compared to 11H480 crore in FY 2010-11H wUereaV Vodafone grew by 40% to end tUe year witU revenueV of 1H295 crore from 925 crore in FY 2010-11.
TUe mucU talked aboutH diVcuVVed and puVUed induVtry Vegment—Broadband—too Vaw a dip in itV buVineVV. Only BSNLH MTNL and Tata Comm could Vome growtU in tUiV Vegment. BSNL being tUe largeVt player in Indian broadband VerviceV moVtly due to itV wideVt reacU acroVV tUe nation Vaw a growtU of juVt 0.57%. It ended tUe year witU 3H327 crore in FY2011-12 compared to 3H308 crore in FY10-11H poor quality of Vervice and lack of deVired Vpeed on itV networkV were key reaVonV for itV poor performance. In termV of new broadband uVerV tUe company did not Vee mucU difference. TUe uVerV wUo were uVing itV VerviceV juVt Vtuck to tUe Vervice providerH