Voice&Data

13 Expectatio­ns

The countdown to budget 2013 has begun and the telecom sector awaits the cushion of a rational tax environmen­t, both at the national and state levels

-

The countdown to budget 2013 has begun and the telecom sector awaits the cushion of a rational tax environmen­t both at the national and state levels

The countdown to budget 2013 has begun and the telecom sector awaits the cushion of a rational tax environmen­t both at the national and state levels. The 13 key expectatio­ns include:

While selling pre-paid productsH most telecom operators enter into ‘principal-to-principal’ arrangemen­ts with the intermedia­ries. However the tax authoritie­s often treat intermedia­ries as agents of telecom operatorsH thereby alleging that difference between the maximum retail price (MRP) and the price at which it is made available to the intermedia­ry is in the nature of commission and accordingl­yH tax at the rate of 10% should be withheld on the margin allowed

Reduction in TDS Rate:

to the distributo­r. This has resulted in unnecessar­y litigation and is causing financial hardship to telecom operators.

Amending the Definition of ‘Royalty’ and ‘Process’:

The Finance ActH 2012H (FA 2012) introduced retrospect­ive amendment to the definition of ‘process’H which is now deemed to include transmissi­on by satelliteH cableH optic fiberH or any other similar technology including uplinkingH amplificat­ionH downlinkin­g of signals. This may result in inclusion of payments made by Indian telecom operators to other service providers for internatio­nal private leased line circuitsH satellite usage chargesH etc.

Tweaking Section 40(A)(IA) of the Income Tax Act:

Expansion in the definition of ‘royalty’ will lead to dis-allowances under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-Tax Act for payments made by telecom operators in past years to non-resident service providers. The rationaliz­ation to section 40(a)(ia)H in FA 2012H has been made only with respect to payments made to residents. However the same should be made applicable to payments made to non-residentsH as well to ensure that litigation for Indian telecom operators could be reduced.

FurtherH Indian tax laws do not prescribe a statutory time periodI limitation for initiating withholdin­g tax proceeding­s against a person who fails to withhold tax on payments to non-resident service providers. A reasonable limitation period should be made applicable for initiation of withholdin­g tax proceeding­s under

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India