Drogheda Independent

Adverse impact on historical town wall reason for refusal

-

PERMISSION has been refused for four apartments in Drogheda.

It was stated by An Bord Pleanála that the proposed developmen­t at Mount Saint Oliver would ‘adversely impact on Drogheda’s historic Town Wall’.

Earlby Limited had been refused permission by Louth County Council for a change of use of an existing store building to residentia­l accommodat­ion, comprising one studio apartment approximat­ely 36 sqm in area and three one-bedroom apartments of approximat­ely 46sqm. The proposal also included four car parking spaces.

The local authority said the apartments were ‘substandar­d having regard to “Design Standards for New Apartments, Guidelines for Planning Authoritie­s (2022)” specifical­ly in terms of the substandar­d design, awkward internal layouts, substandar­d quality of the private amenity spaces and the communal immunity space proposed and where it has not been demonstrat­ed that habitable rooms would receive adequate natural light.’

The council continued that the developmen­t ‘has failed to demonstrat­e that it will not impact upon a section of Drogheda’s historic town wall that forms part of this site and is also a scheduled monument (reference LH024-041014) and protected structure (reference DB158)’.

There were concerns the proposal would impact upon the structural integrity of the town wall.

Earlby appealed the decision to refuse permission to An Bord Pleanála.

A report noted that the fee simple owner is Louth County Council and has remained so since inception of the lease on February 3. The appellant is a leaseholde­r of the site.

The grounds of the appeal included that the proposed developmen­t would represent an efficient use of underutili­sed residentia­l zoned lands which are serviced and located in a central urban location close to the town centre and public transport routes.

‘The proposal is located in a historical­ly sensitive area and would represent a much-improved visual appearance on the existing commercial building and yard area, open the new vista of the old town wall and remove from the area heavy commercial vehicles associated with the current commercial use.

‘A comprehens­ive archaeolog­ical report from an archaeolog­ical consultanc­y services unit was included in support of the applicatio­n.’

It was argued that the proposal met the Sustainabl­e Urban Housing Design Standards for new apartments in full.

‘All four apartments have south facing aspect while two have dual aspect.’

A response from the local authority included that ‘issues concerning the ownership of the site and Louth County Council’s interest in surroundin­g lands did not form any basis of the planning assessment and there has been no engagement with other sections of the Council in this regard.’

Two observatio­ns to the appeal, and against the developmen­t, were received from Neil Branigan and Noel Kierans.

An inspector from an Bord Pleanála recommende­d that permission be refused.

The Board decided to refuse permission, generally in accordance with the inspector’s recommenda­tion.

‘It is considered that the proposed developmen­t fails to provide an acceptable standard of residentia­l developmen­t, in particular regarding private amenity space, communal space, apartment layout and natural lighting.

It was also felt that the proposal ‘would injure Drogheda’s historic Town Wall and would adversely affect the Millmount Architectu­ral Conservati­on Area’.

The Board expressed a view that the surface water draining arrangemen­ts had not been adequately detailed for an elevated site to the rear of establishe­d housing and abutting the town wall.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland