Co Kerry men hanged for murder in 1882 set to receive Presidential pardons

Ireland's Minister for Justice Helen McEntee TD secured Government ap‐ proval on Tuesday, April 16 to recom‐ mend to President Higgins to grant a posthumous presidential pardon to Sylvester Po and James Barrett. Po and Barrett were convicted of the murder of Thomas Browne in October 1882 and were both executed in January 1883.

Ireland's Department of Justice said on Tuesday that given a number of factors in this case, and based upon the detailed Report received from Dr. Niamh Howlin, Minister McEntee and her government colleagues decided to recommend to the President that he exercise his right to pardon, contained in Article 13.6 of the Constitution on the grounds their con‐ victions were unsafe.

The granting of a Presidential Pardon is a right which should be o ered only in the most deserving of circumstances, the Department noted.

Minister McEntee said on Tuesday: “This is a very rare occurrence and a very high bar must be reached for the Government to recommend to the president that he exercise this right.

“Having considered the findings in Dr Howlin’s report, the trial, conviction, and execution of Mr. Po and Mr. Barrett were unfair by the standards of the time. “Both men were wrongfully convicted and su ered the harshest penalty under the law of the time in what can now be attributed to a miscarriage of justice. “I would like to acknowledge the work done by the Castleisland District Her‐ itage Inc. Michael O’Donohue Memorial Project in bringing this case to my De‐ partment.”

Johnnie Roche, Chairman of Castleisland District Heritage, shakes hands with

Tomo Burke, great grandson of

Sylvester...

Posted by Castleisland District Heritage on Tuesday, April 16, 2024

Details of the case, according to Ire‐ land's Department of Justice

The 1880s in Ireland brought frequent agitation for land reform, which often developed into agrarian violence, with outrages pertaining to matters such as landlords, evictions, rent strikes, and boycotts, known as the Land War.

In May 1882, the murders of Lord Fred‐ erick Cavendish, the Chief Secretary, and his Under Secretary, T.H. Burke were carried out in the Phoenix Park in Dublin. Referred to as the Phoenix Park Murders, they were the catalyst for the legislative response to the growing agrarian unrest.

The Prevention of Crime (Ireland) Act 1882 (1882 Act) was a piece of coer‐ cive legislation passed in July 1882 in the aftermath of the Phoenix Park mur‐ ders to clamp down on crimes such as “treason, murder, arson, attacks on dwelling-houses and crimes of aggra‐ vated violence.” Co Kerry and the area around Castleisland in particular, was experiencing a great deal of unrest and violence during this period.

On October 3, 1882, Thomas Browne was murdered while working in one of his fields in Dromulton, near Scartaglin in Co Kerry. Two men in dark coats, seen from behind, shot him several times. Sylvester Po and James Barrett, who did not match the descriptions of the assailants, were known to be in the vicinity at the time. The two men were arrested following a statement by a neighbour that they had seen them enter the field where Browne was shot.

The prosecution case largely rested on the evidence of a neighbour, whose story changed as the case progressed and who could not be regarded as a reliable witness. Po and Barrett were tried twice before special juries in Cork for the murder of Browne after the jury in the first trial failed to reach agreement on a verdict.

Po and Barrett were convicted of the murder of Browne in December 1882 and, despite petitions for mercy to the Lord Lieutenant, they were hanged in Tralee Gaol in January 1883.

Dr. Niamh Howlin, an expert in 19th Century trial law and an Associate Pro‐ fessor in the Sutherland School of Law, UCD, was engaged by the Department of Justice to undertake an independent ex‐ ternal review of the case and to advise upon the safety of the conviction or oth‐ erwise, with clear reference to the pre‐ vailing standards at the time.

Dr. Howlin's examination concluded that a number of factors, including in the in‐ vestigation and procedures around the trial, led her to form the opinion that Po 's and Barrett's convictions were un‐ safe. These factors included: a ‘packed jury,' evidential deficiencies (including conflicting witness testimony), no mo‐ tive, and that other lines of enquiry ap‐ pear to have been neglected during the investigation and trial.

In addition, the report found that there was no direct evidence against Po and Barrett, with the case resting on the cir‐ cumstantial and contradictory evidence of one witness.

Dr Howlin concluded her report by stat‐ ing: "A twenty-first century criminal court would not convict Po and Barrett on the basis of the evidence which was presented by the Crown in 1882. The convictions were also inconsistent with the legal standards of the period. “They were convicted on the basis of ev‐ idence which was both circumstantial and weak. The trials and conviction of Po and Barrett included legal and pro‐ cedural deficiencies which were ‘so in‐ consistent with the legal standards of the period and so objectively unsatisfac‐ tory and unfair, that they render the conviction unsafe.”

Posthumous Presidential Pardons in Ireland

This is the fourth occasion that a posthumous Presidential Pardon could be awarded. The first posthumous Presi‐ dential Pardon was awarded by Presi‐ dent Higgins to Harry Gleeson in 2015. The second posthumous Presidential Pardon, and the first to be granted for events which occurred prior to the for‐ mation of the State, was granted to Myles Joyce in April 2018, who was ex‐ ecuted having been found guilty of in‐ volvement in the Maamtrasna murders in 1882.

The third posthumous pardon was awarded to John Twiss in 2021.

The threshold to recommend a Presi‐ dential Pardon is high and, since 1937, only seven Presidential Pardons have been awarded.