Irish Daily Mail

Scourge of gambling infected the team

Kieron Dyer on the dark days when top England stars would wager away hundreds of thousands

-

We were like clandestin­e drinkers, but our drug was gambling. It was out of control.

ILOVED it when one lad in particular was in the England squad. He was either the unluckiest card player I’ve ever seen or the worst. I think he was the worst. I was just happy to take his money.

He hadn’t been involved with England much under Sven Göran Eriksson and it was a real bonus when Steve McClaren started picking him.

Every time we met up with England, I smashed him all week. It got to the point where he owed me so much money that he asked if he could pay me back in instalment­s and set up a standing order to deal with the payments.

Poor bloke, he must have kept thinking his luck would change, but it never did.

For a while, I got standing orders or bank transfers from him every month.

We didn’t qualify for Euro 2008 with McClaren, which was probably a blessing in disguise for this player – he would have been bankrupt by the end of it.

Not long after we got back from the 2002 World Cup, a story broke that Michael Owen had run up debts of £30,000 in the tournament in card schools at the team hotel and that I was the man to whom he had to pay the money.

I felt sorry for Michael. He had offered to be the bookmaker in Japan and had taken the players’ bets.

I’d done pretty well and had a couple of spectacula­r wins. I put £500 on South Korea to beat Italy in the knockout stages. Michael gave me odds of 16-1. The bet came in, so he owed me £8,500 straight away.

But Michael made money from other people and probably came out around even in the end. In fact, he was probably a few quid up.

The amounts of money that we gambled in my time with England grew more extreme as the years went by, until it got to the point where I thought there was a huge danger it was destabilis­ing individual­s and potentiall­y affecting our results.

People think it began in the Kevin Keegan era, but in my experience the levels of gambling under Keegan were fairly tame.

Everything seemed relatively sedate. Alan Shearer and Gareth Southgate were part of a card school, but I don’t think they played for money.

Some of the other players were in other games and the sums were relatively small, a couple of hundred quid here and there.

When Keegan was replaced by Sven in 2001, things stepped up a notch. It was still manageable – we’re talking about a maximum of a couple of grand in a hand – and it never got over the top.

That sounds pretty excessive but, given the wages we were on, that was not out of control.

Generally, it was me, Michael, Teddy Sheringham, David James and Wayne Bridge and sometimes Robbie Fowler. The stakes were higher than they had been under Keegan.

But the levels that we reached at Euro 2004 and some of the Euro 2008 qualifiers were just ridiculous, eyewaterin­gly huge.

We were gambling such large sums that we knew we couldn’t possibly do it in public. So we gambled in each other’s rooms, behind locked doors.

We were like clandestin­e drinkers, hiding ourselves to get wasted. Except the drug was gambling and there was a sizeable band of us that were addicted.

There were four or five of us who played, but the sums were so large that I’m not going to name names. There were no limits on what we’d gamble or what we’d chase to win our money back if we lost.

The only restrictio­n that we imposed upon ourselves was that we stopped playing 72 hours before a game. It was an unconsciou­s admission that playing cards for obscene amounts of money could be just as damaging to you mentally and physically than going out for a few drinks.

It was an acceptance that it was very hard to get your mind back on an important game if you had lost hundreds of thousands of pounds to a team-mate a couple of nights before. And that is the kind of money I’m talking about.

Gambling that kind of money was routine at Euro 2004.

We didn’t gamble with cash by then, either. That simply wasn’t practical. The table would have been groaning with notes if we’d done that. We gambled with IOUs and kept a record of how much each player owed the pot. That was another reason why the sums became so absurd. Sometimes, it didn’t seem real.

After a week or so in Portugal,

s £46,000 down. Then one night nt from £46,000 down to more £50,000 up. as earning £60,000 or £70,000 a at Newcastle by that stage, but n I was £46,000 down, it was a ble feeling. I hated it. It was in ead. It was out of control. the end of Euro 2004, it had got to the stage where one player was so massively down that he was begging players to do deals. ‘Would you take 30 grand for the 50 grand I owe you?’ he was saying.

Most of the time, people helped him out. I don’t know how much he was down but it would have been a few hundred grand. The amounts of money we were playing for were such that, if someone had a string of bad days, they could easily have been half a million down. That’s just at one tournament. I don’t think it affected relationsh­ips within the squad. But we were at a major tournament. How can you go into an important game and not have that playing on your mind? I don’t care if you’re worth £10million. To be owing half a million pounds in gambling debts off the back of one tournament is an awful lot of cash for anybody.

You’re supposed to be in the shape of your life at a tournament, but if you’re in that kind of debt, your head is going to be a mess. I was a couple of grand up or down by the time we got knocked out by Portugal. The player who lost the most was down by more than £100,000.

Gambling is an issue in soccer. Players get bored. Players have too much disposable income. We are problem gamblers waiting to happen.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland