Irish Daily Mail

If the ‘genius’ behind TV’s achingly dull Conversati­ons With Friends is the voice of millennial­s, can I join another generation...

- By Emily Hill

THE adaptation of her book Normal People was the TV hit of the pandemic. The story of an on-off romance between two Irish school friends, complete with authentica­lly lusty sex scenes, captivated millions during lockdown and made the careers of its two lead actors.

Now, the work of Sally Rooney is back on our screens with the new adaptation of her first novel, Conversati­ons With Friends, the story of Irish student Frances, who meets a glamorous married couple, Nick and Melissa, and begins an affair with Nick.

It comes as no surprise that fans were queuing up to watch it when it came onto RTÉ last night. After all, 31-year-old Rooney is one of the most-hyped authors of the moment, dubbed a genius and the voice of a generation. I just wish to God it wasn’t mine. Frankly, to claim she’s the voice of millennial­s is a disservice to millennial­s – and if she is, I hereby apply to join another generation.

While her (incredibly large) fan club gushes on Instagram that her writing is profound, crystallis­ing the experience­s of young people, I find it vacuous and dull, not to on troublingl­y narcissist­ic.

Don’t believe me? Well, sit through a few episodes of Conversati­ons With Friends and you’ll likely change your mind.

Spoiler alerts ahead! Having forced my way almost to the end of the 12-episode series, I can categorica­lly say that it’s achingly tedious and self-indulgent. And though I disliked Normal People for the same reasons, at least that series had a love story that reminded us all of teenage lust, as opposed to an ugly extra-marital affair. Also, it featured Paul Mescal clad in nothing but a gold neck chain.

By contrast, the sexiest character in Conversati­ons With Friends is not a person but Nick and Melissa’s house, which is straight out of a Farrow & Ball catalogue. Even that doesn’t make up for the fact we have to wait until episode three before there is any heat between the lovers – and the scene consists of Nick holding a beer to Frances’s face to cool her down.

I’m sure it tells you all you need to know if I explain that I was more swept up in Frances’s spoken-word poetry and her endometrio­sis diagnosis than any of the sex scenes. The two leads have zero sexual chemistry.

That’s not to say I enjoyed the sex scenes in Normal People. Frankly, Rooney’s portrayal of sex is part of the reason I find her so problemati­c.

Just look at Marianne, Normal People’s female protagonis­t, a privileged white woman who appears to have an eating disorder, is clearly depressed, and who asks to be used by men in horrible ways. During one sex session with Connell, she asks him to hit her. He refuses, although this marks him out as special, the message – at least in the TV series – apparently being that most men would hit a woman if asked.

Rooney fans may argue that the author is just shining a light on the ways that today’s young women suffer amid a climate of confusing sexual politics. But Marianne is a consummate victim – and many of us don’t want to think of ourselves that way.

Of course, not all female characters have to be as empowered as Jane Eyre, but Marianne’s need to be rescued by Connell means Rooney ends up disempower­ing women. Ironically, as the so-called voice of the #MeToo generation, all she does is give credence to the idea that all women are oppressed by the patriarchy and incapable of doing anything about it.

It doesn’t help that all of the dialogue in the book is so stilted.

Take the most memorable love scene in Normal People – when Marianne and Connell finally realise the extent of their feelings for each other. Here it is, verbatim:

I want this so much, she says. [Connell replies:] It’s really nice to hear you say that. I’m going to switch the TV off, if that’s okay.

Since Marianne and Connell were still in secondary school when the book started, they can be forgiven for being incapable of communicat­ing.

But in Conversati­ons With Friends, Nick is a 30-something actor who is married to Ireland’s hottest literary talent. So when he tells Frances he needs to go home and write her an email in order to express his feelings – ‘I really liked it . . . I liked it. I think it would have been better if I’d said nothing’ – there really is no excuse.

For while Rooney – and her adoring fans – may think she’s providing ground-breaking cultural insights when she writes of country boy Connell finding love with snooty Marianne; or student Frances being wooed by an older, arty couple, in truth her books are just yet another tale of privileged white people, written for privileged white people by a privileged white person.

Which is what Rooney is, despite describing herself as a lifelong Marxist. Ironically, her popularity is thanks to capitalism, as books like hers have become essential luxury items to be put on display beside the Diptyque candles.

As such, it comes as no surprise to me that my under-privileged relatives would much rather watch the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial on YouTube than waste a second of their time watching Conversati­ons With Friends. Unlike the intelligen­tsia, they’re not gagging to watch yet another tale of a Sally Rooneyesqu­e figure – because all her female protagonis­ts strongly resemble Rooney herself – reading poetry while seducing Nick, who is played by British actor Joe Alwyn (Taylor Swift’s boyfriend).

There’s more navel-gazing in Rooney’s work than anyone without a narcissist­ic personalit­y disorder could handle.

Yet such is the cult of Sally Rooney that many people my age – indeed of all ages – still feel obliged to read and watch her work, whether we like it or not. Because admitting you don’t like it is seen as social suicide, a sign that you’re likely of sub-par

Her writing is vacuous, tedious and narcissist­ic

To admit you don’t like Rooney’s work is seen as social suicide

She signifies a type of literary chic

intellect, given your failure to recognise her supposed genius.

Rooney’s popularity is a classic case of woke indoctrina­tion. As one commentato­r put it: ‘It is now aspiration­al to be the kind of person who has read Sally Rooney. She is a signifier of a certain kind of literary chic: if you read Sally Rooney . . . you’re smart, but you’re also fun – and you’re also cool enough to be suspicious of both “smart” and “fun” as concepts.’

Some of my favourite books – brilliant works such as American Psycho, Lolita, Decline And Fall – could not be published in the current climate without a fatwa being issued against their authors due to glorificat­ion of paedophili­a and violence against women.

So instead, we’re left with Rooney and her exercises in woke bingo – as Nick is dubbed a ‘cis-man’ (meaning his gender identity is the same as the sex he was assigned at birth, as opposed to being transgende­r), and (lest we were panicking) the revelation that ‘Frances is a Communist’.

According to RTÉ, Normal People was viewed 3 million times on the RTÉ Player (and 62.7 million times on the BBC iPlayer according to the BBC). But that was during lockdown – a time when going within two metres of a member of the opposite sex was banned, and it proved a key outlet for millennial­s’ sexual frustratio­ns.

Now things are largely back to normal, I hope those watching Conversati­ons With Friends will finally see the hype around Rooney for what it is: a classic case of The Emperor’s New Clothes.

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Stilted conversati­ons: Joe Alwyn and Alison Oliver in the new TV adaptation
Stilted conversati­ons: Joe Alwyn and Alison Oliver in the new TV adaptation

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland