Irish Independent

United must be ruthless to reconfigur­e a squad littered with passengers

- James Ducker

OLE GUNNAR SOLSKJAER is trying to be brave in his bid to help get Manchester United back on top and answer the calls of supporters.

Old Trafford wants silverware, but it also wants electrifyi­ng football, the sort which Paris St-Germain produced on the way to schooling United in the Champions League on Tuesday.

Yet if United are to win that twin battle, whether it is with Solskjaer or another manager with a sense of adventure, the club’s power brokers will also have to be brave, and ruthless, not least over the futures of three forwards, Juan Mata, Alexis Sanchez and Romelu Lukaku, who look increasing­ly like square pegs in round holes.

It stands to reason that a squad, assembled at eye-watering cost on the whims of three different managers with differing outlooks, none of which were a natural fit for United, will have shortcomin­gs and drawbacks.

Solskjaer did not require a “reality check” against PSG to discover that. It just really hit home on a night that started brightly, but ended very badly, and United fans must hope executive vice-chairman Ed Woodward was taking careful note.

Injured

Whereas PSG could deploy Angel Di Maria and Julian Draxler in attack, with Kylian Mbappe for the injured pairing of Neymar and Edinson Cavani, United’s ability to pin back the French champions, defend from the front, press and penetrate, evaporated the moment

Jesse Lingard and

Anthony Martial succumbed to injury.

Mata, Sanchez and Lukaku were ill-equipped to execute the gameplan originally conceived by Solskjaer and the consequenc­es were calamitous in a one-sided second half when PSG scored twice, but could have had four or five.

Sanchez plumbed new depths, with even Solskjaer admitting he was becoming powerless to help a player who “needs to find himself”.

Mata had neither the legs nor the pace to attack with the vigour Solskjaer wants, or to track back in support of right-back Ashley Young, who was overwhelme­d by Di Maria.

And what did it say for Lukaku that, with his team 2-0 down in the first leg of their round-of-16 tie and facing an early exit, a striker who cost the club up to £90 million was not summoned from the substitute­s’ bench until the final six minutes?

From a fog of muddled thinking, Solskjaer has been able to pinpoint where United are strongest and, in less than two months, pull together an exciting first team, with Marcus Rashford, Paul Pogba, Lingard and Martial at their core.

Yet even this eternal optimist admitted post-PSG that, without the players in reserve with the qualities to play specifical­ly the way he wants he could be forced “to find a different way to play” when those first-choice picks are missing.

How do United replace the suspended Pogba in the second leg against PSG following his red card on Tuesday? Fred, a £52m summer signing, has played just 126 minutes under Solskjaer.

United’s squad limitation­s are not isolated to the attack but extend to the midfield and defence, too.

Whether he gets the job permanentl­y or not, Solskjaer knows United must buy and recruit well after five-and-a-half years of incoherenc­e in the transfer market.

Alex Ferguson once described United as “a bus that waits for no man” but, in recent years, it has become a bus that keeps acquiring passengers who never get off.

As fine a person and profession­al as Mata is, for example, the bold approach would be to let him leave this summer when his contract expires given that his attributes are at odds with an attack being built around speed and intensity.

Ruthless would be asking whether Sanchez and Lukaku fit into the bigger picture and taking decisive action, particular­ly if the departure of one, or both, could smooth the arrival financiall­y of a player who does tick the right boxes.

There will always be a limit to what a club can do in a single transfer window, but United cannot continue to fudge the issue.

They acted decisively in the sale of Marouane Fellaini only weeks after Solskjaer’s appointmen­t, but why hand Phil Jones a new four-and-ahalf year contract given his dismal injury record when the sensible option would have been to invoke an option to extend his deal by 12 months and see where things lie this time next year?

PSG just brought some pressing questions into sharper focus. (©

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland