Irish Sunday Mirror

UEFA’S COUNCIL OF THE WISE? JUST A PHOTO OPPORTUNIT­Y FOR CEFERIN

-

TAKING a lead from FIFA, UEFA last week re-elected president Aleksander Ceferin “by acclamatio­n”.

In other words, no one else stood to challenge Ceferin’s reign and he will remain the second-most powerful man in world football for at least another four years.

There were some encouragin­g developmen­ts at the congress in Lisbon – the FA’S Debbie Hewitt becoming a UEFA representa­tive on the FIFA executive committee, and Laura Mcallister, from the FA of Wales, being appointed to the UEFA executive committee.

That is the committee that has, apparently, assembled a ‘council of wise men’ to address fundamenta­l issues within the sport.

Confirmed members of the newly formed UEFA

Football Board are, in no particular order: Zvonimir Boban, Gareth Southgate, Jose Mourinho, Rio Ferdinand, Zinedine Zidane, Roberto Rosetti, Carlo Ancelotti, Paolo Maldini, Fabio Capello, Javier Zanetti, Luis Figo, Philipp Lahm, Ronald Koeman, Michael Laudrup, Rafa Benitez, Roberto Martinez, Predrag Mijatovic, Jurgen

Klinsmann, Rudi Voller, Petr Cech, Juan Mata and Robbie Keane.

It is tough to know which blindingly obvious observatio­n to make first.

Let’s start with the all-male bit, the ‘council of wise men’.

It seems that there will be a similar body formed to cover issues in and around the women’s game.

Are those issues so fundamenta­lly different from the men’s game that you need a separate body? Of course not. Apparently, one of the main tasks of the Football Board will be to look at the laws of the game and the last time I checked, those laws were the same for men as they were for women.

On a basic level, the days of all-male committees in ANY sport should be long, long gone.

The second observatio­n relates to the diversity of the group.

Patrick Vieira and Didier Drogba have, it seems, been invited and have yet to confirm but even then would the compositio­n of this panel really reflect the diversity of the game across the continent?

Take another look at the names.

At the very best, it is a grim reflection of the lack of opportunit­ies for black coaches at so-called elite level.

UEFA would probably argue that this group’s focus will be solely what occurs on the field, the implementa­tion of VAR, and, if Ceferin’s speech the other day is anything to go by, the handball rule. But again, football panels should be as representa­tive as possible.

And where are the fans’ groups, the people who pay the money and the TV subscripti­ons that fill UEFA coffers?

Perhaps this panel will have a positive effect but it looks like a gimmick – it looks like Ceferin and UEFA getting a load of famous football blokes together for a photo opportunit­y.

What can they really affect when – as it appears will be the case – they are to meet just once a year?

This smacks of Gianni Infantino and his FIFA Legends – so expect Ceferin (left) to be centre-stage when the cameras click at the first meeting later this month.

FIFA and UEFA actually do a lot of good things… but their sense of self-importance is never far from the surface.

When it comes to FIFA or Ceferin’s UEFA a sense of self-importance is never far from the surface

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland