The Irish Mail on Sunday

Watchdog probes bus routes costing €160m

PAC clears way for audit of Bus Eireann after investigat­ion by MOS

- By Michael O’Farrell INVESTIGAT­IONS EDITOR iosinvesti­gations@gmail.com

THE State’s spending watchdog has been cleared to investigat­e Bus Éireann’s €166m school transport scheme after a lengthy Irish Mail on Sunday investigat­ion into kickbacks for routes.

Until now the Office of the Comptrolle­r and Auditor General Seamus McCarthy has never been allowed to audit any aspect of commercial semi-State companies such as Bus Éireann, even though millions in taxpayer funds support them.

But in a ground-breaking move spearheade­d by the Dáil’s Public Accounts Committee, an agreement has now been reached to allow a C&AG audit of procuremen­t practices in the school transport scheme.

The move follows a lengthy MoS investigat­ion into allegation­s of bribery and corruption within the scheme involving some private con- tractors who allege they paid kickbacks for lucrative routes.

The contractor­s, who allege they paid for foreign holidays and gave cash to Bus Éireann officials, claim they lost their routes if they refused to pay. These claims – along with supporting evidence obtained by the MoS – have now been forwarded by the Oireachtas Transport Committee to gardaí for investigat­ion.

Speaking this weekend, PAC chairman John McGuinness said the move to allow the C&AG examine the school transport accounts was the ‘breakdown of a major barrier’: ‘ The C&AG, the Department and ourselves at the PAC – arising from the matters raised about the scheme – have agreed that this will now happen,’ he said.

‘The C&AG will be undertakin­g to do that work and out of that will come all of the informatio­n that an independen­t audit can reveal.’

In response to queries from the MoS this week, a spokesman for the C&AG said he was aware of the developmen­t but could not yet comment further.

Speaking before the PAC on May 15, Department of Educa- tion Secretary General Seán Ó Foghlú said his department, which funds the school transport scheme, was happy to facilitate the C&AG’s involvemen­t.

‘We reflected on that and discussed it with our partner Department­s… We concluded that we could see no reason the [C&AG] would not be fully free

Claims have been forwarded to gardaí

to follow the school transport money into Bus Éireann if he so wished,’ he said.

‘As a semi-State body, Bus Éireann has the power not to accept it but because it agrees, there is no difficulty. If, for example, the [C&AG] wishes to examine the effectiven­ess of procuremen­t by Bus Éireann there would be no difficulty with that.’

Mr McCarthy was also at the committee and when asked if he was aware of these new arrangemen­ts he confirmed: ‘Yes, we have spoken about it.’

Meanwhile it emerged this week that Bus Éireann has made significan­t changes to a report into the allegation­s of bribery that it was ordered to prepare by Transport Minister Leo Varadkar in the wake of this newspaper’s revelation­s.

The version of the report first published on the company’s website last month has now been altered with several crucial paragraphs taken out.

The original version contains the following statement:

‘Whereas we cannot categorica­lly conclude that it has never happened, there is no evidence to suggest that any gift has been accepted by any individual in a manner that breaches the company’s code of business ethics.

‘As regards the allegation of corruption we have found no evidence to suggest that there is/was deliberate exclusion of any party from the tendering process or that any party obtained a contract by improper or corrupt means.’

But the current version of the report – which has now replaced the first one online – does not contain this conclusion anywhere even though it is central to the report and was reported widely throughout the media at the time of the report’s release.

In a statement this week, the company acknowledg­ed the discrepanc­ies. It said it was in the process of finalising a third version of the report for publicatio­n online.

‘This was not intentiona­l and was the result of drafts of the report being created, and edited, as required,’ a spokesman said.

He said the correct and complete version of the report would be online next week.

 ??  ?? probe: Irish Mail on Sunday front-page coverage of the alleged kickbacks, published on April 13, April 20 and May 18
probe: Irish Mail on Sunday front-page coverage of the alleged kickbacks, published on April 13, April 20 and May 18
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland