A-list faces froze in horror at last week’s ‘best picture’ fiasco. But can you tell the REAL stars from their waxwork doubles? Eyes down for the ultimate...
-
by Jo Knowsley
IT WAS an extraordinary moment in Oscars history – a wrong winner announcement that left the A-list audience paralysed in disbelief. According to some Hollywood wags, they looked like waxwork models – and who, these days, can tell the difference? State-of-the-art modelling techniques mean that the longderided sculptures are attaining a new – some might say frightening – likeness to the stars they are supposed to represent.
In, fact, the models are so good these days, there has been a boom in waxwork exhibitions. Madame Tussauds, for example, now has 24 branches worldwide. Despite the spread of computer modelling and CGI, waxwork models are still made after live sittings – with the final product being sculpted from clay, chicken wire and newspaper.
The figures take four months to make and typically cost €170,000. The hair, for instance, is not a wig: each strand of real hair is individually inserted into the sculpture’s artificial scalp.
You might argue, cruelly, that today’s generation of Hollywood stars have made the job a little easier by immobilising their own faces with Botox, fillers, bee venom and an ever-more exotic range of cosmetic procedures.
But can you spot which of these superstars is the real deal – and which are lifeless dummies who would melt under the spotlight?