The Irish Mail on Sunday

true colours

- CRAIG BROWN

The Colour Of Time: A New History Of The World 1850-1860 Dan Jones and Marina Amaral Head of Zeus €28 ★★★★★

These days, few people take black-and-white photograph­s, but those who do find that it lends a certain timeless gravitas to the sitters. Contempora­ry men and women suddenly seem like historical figures. And it works the other way around, too: if you expertly colour an old black-and-white picture of a long-gone figure like Queen Victoria or General Custer, you find that, as if by magic, they are rescued from history, and appear as vivid as our contempora­ries.

Marina Amaral is a Brazilian artist who specialise­s in colouring historical photos. She has produced a book of 200 photograph­s that were originally in black and white but are miraculous­ly now in colour.

The effect of colour is far more transforma­tive than you might imagine. The Wright Brothers take off from a hill in the first manned flight in 1903: instead of being light grey, the sky is a brilliant blue, and suddenly it seems like yesterday.

Another pioneering aviator, Amelia Earhart, sits smiling in the cockpit of her two-person Lockheed Electra 10E, in 1937, ready to embark on the first circumnavi­gation of the globe by air. In the old black-and-white photograph, she looks like a distant figure from long ago. But when the same photograph is turned into colour – her hair ginger, her eyes blue, her leather jacket a shiny light brown – she not only looks much younger, but she also looks as though she heaved herself into that cockpit only yesterday, ready to set out on her fateful voyage.

How Marina Amaral achieves this extraordin­ary effect is never quite explained. In an all-too-brief introducti­on, Amaral and her co-author, Dan Jones (who supplies the deft and pithy commentary), say that the photograph­s have been ‘digitally colourised’, but that ‘although the canvas on which you work is a computer screen, every single part of the picture is coloured by hand’. The process can take anything up to a month for a single photograph.

How accurate are the colours? ‘There is no way of knowing the original hues just by looking at the different shades of grey.’ Nor is there any computer programme that can turn black and white into colour, or at least not with any accuracy. Instead, Amaral has to use historical research to tease out every colour. ‘A portrait of a soldier, say, will contain uniforms, medals, ribbons, patches, vehicles, skin, eye and hair colours. Where possible, each detail must be verified: traced via other visual or written sources.’

There’s a photograph in the book of the great French actress Sarah Bernhardt, taken in 1890, staring straight at the camera, wearing a metallic, heavily bejewelled headpiece. Now, in the past I’ve seen countless photograph­s of Bernhardt, including this one, but they have all looked like relics: none has given me more than the faintest clue as to her allure and her charisma. But – hey presto! – here she stands in her mauve tunic, peppered with rubies and emeralds, her piercing blue eyes cutting straight into the camera, and she immediatel­y comes alive. Colour has resurrecte­d her charisma. She is in command. For the first time ever, I can see why the wonderfull­y acute French diarist Jules Renard once wrote of her, ‘When she comes down the winding staircase of the hotel, it looks as though she were standing still, while the staircase turns around her’.

Or take Butch Cassidy and his famous gang of outlaws. Around the year 1900, while on the run, they got dressed up in their Sunday best and marched into a photograph­ic studio in Fort Worth, Texas, to have their portrait taken. Legend has it that they then cockily sent their group photo to a bank after robbing it, and also to Pinkerton’s Detective Agency. In black and white, the photograph is interestin­g but somehow unremarkab­le: the five men look much like any starchy group of bowler-hatted Victorians. But colour makes them come alive and, by broadening the range of hues, allows one to glimpse telling little details: while the other four members of his gang are looking stony-faced and slightly to the left of camera, Butch Cassidy himself is looking at the photograph­er, a sly smile playing on his lips. Also, just behind Cassidy’s left shoulder is a bunch of flowers, part of a painted backdrop. One barely notices the flowers in black and white, but in colour their genteel creams and pinks lend a further mocking tone to this decorous portrait of these notorious bank robbers. The life-like quality of Amaral’s colouring also adds a great deal to the magic. Even today, when colour reproducti­on is pretty advanced, there is still an artificial­ity to the colour in most ordinary photograph­s: it tends to be too bright, too garish, too primitive, so that it remains distinct from life as we see it.

But Amaral’s colouring is extremely subtle: the hue in the fold of a trouser leg seems to contain infinite variations. This

means that her touched-up photograph­s look even more realistic, and closer to life, than a photograph taken yesterday.

You can see this in a photograph of Leo Tolstoy in old age sitting on a bench with his grandchild­ren Ilya and Sonya, his forefinger­s a foot or so apart, because he is telling them a story about a garden full of cucumbers. The children are smiling, and clearly captivated by their grandpa, the master storytelle­r.

It is not time alone that obscures the great men of that era: their beards also play a big part in hiding their faces from us. Photograph­s in the book of other late-Victorian beardies include Charles Darwin, Karl Marx and Ulysses S Grant.

No doubt someone will one day pioneer a photograph­ic technique for posthumous­ly scraping the beards off these illustriou­s figures, so that we can see them clean-shaven. Until that day comes, Amaral draws us as close as we can be to them: Tolstoy is as clear as daylight in this delightful photograph, his long, straight fingers and beautiful old hands never more vivid.

It is a shame, though, that there is so little delight in the rest of the book. This is not the fault of the technique, which strikes me as faultless, but of the authors’ selection: at least three-quarters of the photograph­s in this book involve war, death and destructio­n. Human progress across the 100 years on display – advances in art or sport, or in justice and welfare – is marginalis­ed. Gloom takes centre stage, while joy barely gets a look-in.

Page after page is given over to photograph­s of bloody conflicts and battles from around the world: not only the First and Second World Wars, but the Russo Japanese war, the Philippine-American War, the Italo-Ethiopian war, the Anglo Afghan war, the Russo-Turkish war, and so on, and so on.

Corpses abound: ‘This picture shows decapitate­d prisoners lying in the street after one bout of revolution­ary violence,’ runs the descriptio­n of a photograph taken of a Chinese bloodbath in 1908. There are pictures of the dead Mussolini, the Crown Prince of Austria after his suicide, a field of dead Confederat­es after the Battle of Gettysburg, and, neatly laid out in open coffins, the Communards of Paris, slaughtere­d by the French army in 1871.

The Hindenburg wrapped in flames; a newsboy brandishin­g a placard that reads ‘TITANIC DISASTER GREAT LOSS OF LIFE’; the empty room, punctured by bullet holes, in which the Romanovs met their grizzly end: the title of this book might just as easily have been Human Misery in Colour.

Why the authors decided to make such a colourful book so dark is never explained, but anyone leafing through what the subtitle calls A New History Of The World 1850-1960 would be left thinking that those 100 years were just an endless procession of slaughter, with a few bearded achievers thrown in for good measure.

‘The title of this book might just as easily have been Human Misery in Colour’

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? cLocKwIsE FroM LEFT: Butch Cassidy (front row, right) and the Sundance Kid (front row, left), 1900; Sarah Bernhardt, 1893; the Hindenburg disaster, 1937; Hitler, Dortmund, 1933
cLocKwIsE FroM LEFT: Butch Cassidy (front row, right) and the Sundance Kid (front row, left), 1900; Sarah Bernhardt, 1893; the Hindenburg disaster, 1937; Hitler, Dortmund, 1933
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland