The Irish Mail on Sunday

My books of the year

…from Meghan Markle to Oscar Wilde and a ‘tantrummy’ President to the undisputed Queen of US fiction

- By CRAIG BROWN

Years ago, I used to review restaurant­s. No one ever asked me if I always ate everything on my plate. But now that I review books, the question I’m most often asked is: ‘Do you finish every book?’

The answer is yes, though it can sometimes be a struggle. I remember wondering if I was ever going to get to the end of former British home secretary David Blunkett’s diaries, which ran to 850 pages. Blunkett seemed to take a fierce pride in avoiding any topic of interest. Reading novelist Margaret Drabble’s memoirs, I came across this sentence. It crossed my mind that it might be the most boring ever written: ‘I maintain (though she queried this) that it was I who usefully introduced my aunt to scampi and chips, at an excellent but now defunct hostelry overlookin­g the Bristol Channel at Linton.’

So there is often a temptation to skip. Is there any real need for a critic to read every word? ‘I never read a book before reviewing it,’ claimed the Rev. Sydney Smith. ‘It prejudices a man so.’ The late Auberon Waugh once told me he read only the right-hand pages of any book he was reviewing. Personally, I prefer the more dogged approach favoured by the critic Cyril Connolly. ‘I stay very close to the text – no soaring eagle but a low-slung basset who hunts by scent and keeps his nose to the ground.’

The popular view of book critics is that, compared to ordinary readers, we are spiteful, crotchety misanthrop­es, hell-bent on putting the boot in. Yet the opposite is, in my experience, more often the case: you only have to browse in a book shop to see that virtually every third-rate novel is called ‘a triumph’ and every dreary biography ‘masterly’. Most critics, myself included, are too kind rather than too mean, perhaps because most of us write books too, so have much sympathy for our fellow authors.

Meanwhile, the internet is awash with infinitely nastier comments from ordinary readers. Whenever I feel like a short, sharp shock, I press the button on amazon.co.uk that takes me to the one-star reviews of my book, Ma’am Darling, from ordinary readers: ‘Utter rubbish’, ‘Don’t waste your money’, ‘Complete disappoint­ment’, and so forth. Perversely, my first reaction is to wonder if they might have a point. There’s no reason to suppose they are not being honest, and who is to say they are wrong?

All a reviewer can do is to explain what a book is trying to achieve and, in the most honest and entertaini­ng way possible, to say if it has succeeded. I have a nice lot of space, so I am allowed to make my reviews more than just a potted summary: this means I can follow peculiar trains of thought, crack jokes, deal at some length with wise or wrongheade­d assertions, and generally go off-piste.

About 200,000 new titles are published in the UK alone every year. Which to write about? By and large, I try to review books I think I will enjoy, either because I trust the author, or because I am interested in the subject. Sometimes, a book is so newsworthy it thrusts itself forward: this year, Michael Wolff’s exposé Fire And Fury: Inside The Trump White House (Little, Brown €21) fell into that category. Was it all it was cracked up to be? Like many of these overnight sensations, it was a bit of a mish-mash, portraying the tantrummy Trump as Toddler-in-Chief, but offering little hard evidence to back it all up.

Books about Trump are fast becoming more numerous. Some are by experience­d journalist­s like Bob Woodward, others by aggrieved men and women Trump has sacked, or, in Stormy Daniels’s case, taken to the sack. Here, where Trump supporters are thin on the ground, publishers have mercifully spared us the avalanche of pro-Trump books that are currently clogging up bookstands in the US, with their bullish titles like Liars, Leakers And Liberals: The Case Against The Anti-Trump Conspiracy and Resistance Is Futile! – How The Trump-Hating Left Lost Its Collective Mind.

There is also a craze for Olympian history books, of whom the principal exponent is Yuval Noah Harari. His first book, Sapiens, was subtitled A Brief History Of Humankind and his second, Homo Deus, had the even more ambitious subtitle A Brief History Of Tomorrow. This year he published 21 Lessons For The 21st Century (Jonathan Cape €16.99). It turned out to be a tired medley of alarmist generalisa­tions and soppy banalities. Small wonder that its sales figures have failed to match its predecesso­rs.

Most of the time I am guided by my own curiosity. Over the years I have reviewed far too many books about the Nazis and Victorian murderers, so I have been taking a breather from them. But for some obscure reason I am still intrigued by Wallis Simpson, the Duchess of Windsor, who seems to merit a couple of new biographie­s every year. In 2018 Andrew Morton, moved from Princess Diana to the Duchess of Windsor. Wallis In Love (Michael O’Mara €28) claimed to be ‘The Untold Story’ but it turned out to be the same old story we’ve heard countless times before. Its ‘revelation’ was that a hanger-on called Herman Rogers was ‘the only man she ever truly loved’. Oh, yes? Morton’s source was thirdhand. Ever the busy bee, three months later, Morton brought out an instant biography of Meghan Markle (Meghan: A Hollywood Princess, Michael O’Mara €28), whom he breathless­ly described as the ‘first bi-racial divorcée ever to marry a member of the British royal family’. Not all royal books are duds. One of the most richly enjoyable books this year was The Quest For Queen Mary (Zuleika €35), by James Pope-

THE POPULAR VIEW OF BOOK CRITICS IS THAT WE ARE HELL-BENT ON PUTTING THE BOOT IN

Hennessy, the witty notebooks of Queen Mary’s authorised biographer, made public after 60 years or more. It’s full of brilliantl­y funny pen-portraits. For instance, he finds Princess Pauline ‘one of the strangest figures I have ever contemplat­ed. She is enormously fat, with a huge red face like an old baby, one tooth in her top jaw, which she kept coyly covering with a hand, clipped white hair like cotton wool (shaven at the neck like a general) and an expression of delighted benevolenc­e; jammed against her table she looked like a greedy child on a high chair.’

Other highlights were a huge but always lively biography of Oscar Wilde, Oscar: A Life (Apollo €30), by Matthew Sturgis, a devastatin­g history of the Vietnam war by Max Hastings (Vietnam: An Epic Tragedy, 1945-1975, William Collins €42), and Red Thread by Charlotte Higgins (Jonathan Cape €35), an examinatio­n of labyrinths and mazes that managed to be both playful and fiercely intelligen­t. Among the new novels I read, two favourite writers were on good – if not quite best – form: Meg Wolitzer with The Female Persuasion (Chatto & Windus €21) and the blessed Anne Tyler with Clock

Dance (Chatto & Windus €27). Away from reviewing, this year my purest reading pleasure came from The Towers Of Trebizond by Rose Macaulay, first published in 1956. It’s a revelation – a novel that’s in equal parts funny and melancholy, sexy and spiritual, whimsical and profound.

BOOKS ON TRUMP BY THOSE HE SACKED OR, IN STORMY’S CASE, HAD TAKEN TO THE SACK

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? POPULAR SUBJECTS IN 2018: Donald Trump, Meghan Markle (top), and Wallis Simpson (below left in 1951)
POPULAR SUBJECTS IN 2018: Donald Trump, Meghan Markle (top), and Wallis Simpson (below left in 1951)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland