The Irish Mail on Sunday

HOW CROMWELL’S WAR MADE THEATRE GO UNDERGROUN­D

Cromwell shut down the playhouses but had a liking for music

- MICHAEL MOFFATT

The saga of the Clifden golfers has all the marks of Greek drama about it, of high profile people bringing the house down on themselves. Was it a bad case of hubristic over-confidence, like Oedipus bringing ruin on himself and his family despite plenty of warnings, or some kind of herd blindness?

Of course the rules in Ireland about what was or wasn’t forbidden, hadn’t the full force of law as the former EU Trade Commission­er Phil Hogan unavailing­ly pointed out three times.

In England during the plague, or in tempestuou­s times under Cromwell and the Puritans, the government didn’t make that mistake.

The difference between the Puritans and modern times is that there wasn’t much scope for argument. The laws were clear and draconian and the punishment­s for disobeying these rules were very tough.

An order of 1647 suppressin­g all plays, condemned them for being ‘an occasion of great vices and disorders, tending to the provocatio­n of God’s wrath.’

All stages, seats and boxes were to be pulled down and demolished, and ‘any player proved to have acted in such performanc­es was to be ‘openly and publicly whipped or committed to jail.’ Anyone offending a second time was ‘to be punished as an incorrigib­le rogue’.

Our current habit of removing the metaphoric­al whip from offending politician­s doesn’t have the same ring of firmness.

Cromwell would not even allow a verse by Shakespear­e to be recited at his daughter’s wedding. ‘Away with Shakespear­e and his descriptio­n of human passions,’ he said. ‘It offends against every commandmen­t of the Decalogue.’

A lot of actors had been involved in the English Civil War between parliament and the king, but when it was over they were jobless, neither soldiers nor actors, without theatres to perform in.

The hard-up performers tried to get round the rules as safely as they could.

Occasional production­s took place in private houses. The widow of the Earl of Holland arranged a series of performanc­es at her home in Kensington, and a collection was made for the actors after the play. Not unlike the donate button today.

To get round the restrictio­ns, performanc­es would sometimes be advertised as ‘an exhibition of rope-walking’ or some other harmless pursuit.

On other occasions bribery was used, but there was always the risk of soldiers interrupti­ng proceeding­s and the performers ending up in jail.

In fact, the main point of shutting theatres, apart from puritanica­l rigour, was to keep the lid on possible political disturbanc­e by the audiences, especially when King Charles was about to be executed.

But again, like today, Cromwell was aware that people were getting fed up with the lack of entertainm­ents.

And strangely, he had a fondness for song and music, especially organ music.

It allowed him to permit the performanc­e of a play, The Siege

of Rhodes, cleverly disguised as a kind of opera, staged privately in London.

His taste in humour, however, was very basic. He detested the bawdy comedy of the stage, but he liked buffoonery.

‘The kind of joke I like is the harmless joke of sitting on my hat’ he explained, a joke he actually often performed.

A pity it’s not the only thing he’s remembered for.

‘Cromwell was aware that people were fed up with the lack of entertainm­ents’

 ??  ?? UNmoved: Oliver Cromwell was not a fan of bawdy stage comedies
UNmoved: Oliver Cromwell was not a fan of bawdy stage comedies

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland