Would heat recovery system help reduce our carbon footprint?
QOur bungalow house was built circa 1984. In 2012, after I retired, we did some remedial work on our house which included increasing attic insulation, having outer walls pumped with bead insulation, and replacing our oil boiler.
I recently read an article about a system which recovers heat from ventilation units placed in various rooms in the building which would provide heat in the building. I was wondering if this system would help with the heating of our home and therefore help in reducing our carbon footprint?
AThere is an increasing drive towards energy efficiency or low-carbon footprints and rightly so as we have been profligate with the easy availability of cheap fossil fuels. These are rapidly coming to an end and it’s past time to really engage with energy efficiency, so congratulations on the steps you have taken so far.
The Government is also addressing this issue with revised building regulations coming into force in April next year for both energy efficiency and ventilation as part of the near-zero energy buildings (nZEB) initiative implemented by the European Union since 2010. You will also note that the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI) is pushing hard on the uptake of grants for home improvements towards energy efficiency.
Thermally efficient and airtight homes sound great but without adequate ventilation they can be very unhealthy. It is recommended that air in an occupied room needs to be changed at least three times every hour, that’s three sets of hard-garnered energy that will escape with that warm, stale air. This is a significant energy loss in an otherwise energy-efficient home but it’s essential for health reasons.
A number of companies have recognised the demand in this area and most of their systems claim up to 100 per cent efficiency. However, to be clear, that means that only half the energy can be recovered. Simply put, if your set temperature is 20 degrees and it’s zero outside then the system can save only 10 degrees, meaning the fresh air will come in at half the difference, eg 10 degrees. Typically it’s less, but this is still helpful because it’s better than the temperature outside.
I have noticed in a number of homes I have inspected that the units are turned off in winter because of the perception of a relatively cold draught leading to the potential of an unhealthy home, so it is very important to fully understand what such a system does and to operate it to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The new zeitgeist in this area – already popular in Scandinavia – is heat recovery ventilation with inbuilt heat pump in the exhaust air. These systems fully control energy movement because a small heat pump in the system moves required energy from the outgoing stale air to always maintain the set temperature in the incoming fresh air. They also recover spare energy to heat the hot water tank.
We are finding that year-round healthy, warm homes can be designed with such systems, which are less costly to install than traditional heating systems and are extremely efficient to run. Added benefits include their cooling effect during hot summers and ensuring that healthy, warm air is always maintained throughout the home.
I hope that the upcoming changes to the SEAI’s “dwelling energy assessment procedure” software for assessing energy ratings (BERs) recognises the benefit of these systems that don’t require large outside energy inputs, as already recognised in much colder countries; and, coupled with solar panels, they are a great way to reach nZEB standard.
I hope this helps you in researching a decision towards your zero-carbon future. Fergus Merriman is a member of the Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland.
QWe went sale agreed on a property in Dublin. The building surveyor report highlighted issues with electrics and recommended the house be rewired. We reduced our offer on the house and this was not accepted by the agent/vendor. The agent immediately put the house back on the market without even attempting to negotiate with us. We feel that we have no option but to look for other houses but prefer the one we went sale agreed on. How best can we approach to open some dialogue with the agent and vendor as we feel that there is still room for negotiation?
AThe selling agent, who is acting for the vendor, has a responsibility to the vendor to achieve the best sale agreement possible. When a purchaser’s surveyor finds that a property requires rewiring, then a copy of the relevant part of this survey could be shown to the agent together with a quote from a suitably qualified electrician for verification on cost.
Then the agent can go back to the vendor and can often mediate between vendor and purchaser to come to some agreement such as splitting the cost of works required.
However, it can also be the case that the agent, who generally knows more about the vendor’s situation, may have been instructed by the vendor at the outset or at the sale agreed stage what the minimum acceptable price is likely to be, regardless of the result of a subsequent survey.
In such cases, if the agent, after reverting back to their client with the survey re-
Send your queries to propertyques[email protected]times.com
or to Property Clinic, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street, Dublin 2. This column is a readers’ service. The content of the Property Clinic is provided for general information only. It is not intended as advice on which readers should rely. Professional or specialist advice should be obtained before persons take or refrain from any action on the basis of the content. The Irish Times and its contributors will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from reliance on any content. sults, is still instructed not to renegotiate, then it is out of the remit of the agent and the agent has no authority to renegotiate the price. If instructed by the vendor, the property will be placed back on the market.
I know of a similar case recently where a price was agreed and at the outset the sell- ing agent advised the purchaser, at the request of the vendor, that there would be no renegotiation whatsoever on the price regardless of any survey results. The purchasers came back to the agent after their survey, insisting that the vendor carry out woodworm treatment.
The cost involved was by no means substantial but the vendor adhered to the original agreement and viewed the purchaser’s request as “changing the goalposts” from the agreement.
The vendor then instructed the agent to remarket the property immediately whereupon they resold the property to another purchaser for the same price. Had the original purchasers adhered to the original point of sale agreement of “no renegotiation” as stressed to them upon agreeing of the sale, then they would have been successful in their bid to buy the house.
Typically, in many cases where a survey points out some issue/issues to be addressed, the agent can act as a mediator between vendor and purchaser as outlined but ultimately in the vendor’s interest. The agent must always act on the vendor’s instructions provided these instructions are reasonable. Roger Berkeley is a chartered residential surveyor and member of the Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland.
A heat recovery system can help reduce your carbon footprint.