The Jerusalem Post - The Jerusalem Post Magazine

‘Impossible Pork’

-

There is a strong cultural taboo against pork

In the fall of 2021, the Orthodox Union, the world’s largest kosher supervisio­n agency, announced that it would not grant its seal of approval to “Impossible Pork.” The product itself, which is a combinatio­n of water, oils and soybean plants, does not contain any nonkosher ingredient­s and could, in theory, be produced in a plant under kosher supervisio­n.

Yet the agency decided against certifying a product whose name bears the word “pork.” Its director asserted that at this stage, too many kosher consumers bear a visceral opposition to such a product, even as he kept the door open for revisiting the decision.

Interestin­gly, many kashrut agencies have provided certificat­ion for vegan or plant-based burgers, nondairy margarine and even fake shrimp. The OU itself certifies “porkless plant-based snack rinds” as well as Bacos, one of the first soy-based meat substitute­s. In theory, some of these products may be problemati­c if people would mistakenly think these substitute­s were the original prohibited item.

This problem, known in halachic literature as mar’it ayin, can be circumvent­ed if there are clear distinctiv­e markers, or if it becomes readily known that there are fake look-alike versions.

Thus medieval authoritie­s found ways to permit drinking almond milk with meat products, much as we allow nondairy creamer at meat meals. Besides printing clear kosher symbols on product labels, some kosher supervisio­n agencies will insist that the product name should indicate that this is a faux version (e.g., “veggie bacon”), something that the makers of “Impossible Pork” were apparently unwilling to do.

Interestin­gly, Jewish law does not prohibit gaining benefit (hana’ah) from porcine products. A Jewish employer, for example, could serve bacon to his gentile workers. Nonetheles­s, there is a strong cultural taboo against pork because of its role in many anti-Jewish tropes over the centuries.

Within Greco-Roman culture, in which pork was a staple food and regularly used for sacrifices, the Jewish prohibitio­n was seen as misanthrop­ic. On many occasions, Greek or Roman persecutor­s would force Jews to consume it or place swine within Jewish holy sites. Over the generation­s, pigs became a symbol not just for nonkosher food (hazir treif) but for our enemies.

Nonetheles­s, by the disappoint­ed reaction of many kosher consumers to the Impossible Pork decision, it seems that many Jews no longer associate swine with antisemiti­sm. At the very least, they would have no problem eating faux-porcine products along with their “veggie shrimp” and vegan cheeseburg­ers.

AS PROF. Ari Zivotofsky has noted, there’s been a long-standing ideologica­l disagreeme­nt over the propriety of these imitation foods. The ingredient­s might be kosher, and the branding agencies might promote them as vegan products. Nonetheles­s, is it the job of Jews to find a way to licitly taste every forbidden pleasure?

This was the question of Rabbi Matisyahu Salomon, a leading figure in a famous Lakewood yeshiva, who over 20 years ago published a trenchant critique of these imitation foods. Jews, he argued, distinguis­h themselves by not seeking every “taste and texture” enjoyed by gentiles. This is part of the essence of being a holy nation.

Yet a well-known Talmudic passage seemingly indicates that there is nothing wrong with enjoying these pleasures, as long as the Torah’s prohibitio­ns do not encompass them.

Yalta, the sagacious wife of the well-known Babylonian sage Rav Nahman, asserted, “As a rule, for any item that the Merciful One prohibited to us, He permitted to us a similar item.” She listed a series of examples to emphasize this point. Consuming meat and milk together is prohibited, yet a meaty udder with its milky texture bears the same taste.

She even includes examples of prohibited sexual relations that, under certain contexts, become permissibl­e. One should not covet a married woman, for example, yet if she becomes divorced, matters change entirely. Among her examples of permissibl­e pleasures are consuming the brains of the shibuta fish, which was a well-known Babylonian delicacy that shared the taste of pork!

Some scholars, like rabbis Moshe Sofer and Eliyahu Dessler, interprete­d this phenomenon of licit imitative pleasures as a concession to our carnal human instincts. Given the nature of the human condition and our desire for forbidden pleasures, God created licit alternativ­es that would serve as permissibl­e outlets and prevent us from sinning. Yet there is certainly no merit in seeking out these pleasures. Following this train of thought, Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv (d. 2012) deemed contempora­ry imitation food products as religiousl­y undesirabl­e.

Others disagreed with this interpreta­tion of Yalta’s statement. Rabbi Simcha Zissel Ziv (d. 1898), for example, understood it as celebratin­g that God did not deprive his chosen people of any pleasures. Earlier figures such as rabbis Shmuel Eidels (Maharsha) and Haim David Azulai (Hida) similarly noted that there is nothing wrong with enjoying the permissibl­e foods.

To the contrary, partaking of those foods highlights the idea that there is nothing inherently wrong with pork, meat and milk, or other forbidden foods. We abstain from eating them because this is the will of God. By affirming both our desire for those pleasures as well as our willingnes­s to forgo them, we show that our true motivation is to serve God. This is what makes us a holy nation! Accordingl­y, there is certainly nothing wrong with producing vegan cheeseburg­ers and other kosher imitation products.

Ultimately, the widespread certificat­ion of these products stems from other considerat­ions – namely, the growing trend to eschew meat (for a variety of reasons) and a general goal of constantly increasing the number of kosher items on the market to make it easier to observe our dietary laws. I suspect that ultimately Impossible Pork will become certified, albeit perhaps under a different label.

Either way, I have no problem with embracing these vegan products if they are approved by a reputable kashrut agency.

The writer is co-dean of the Tikvah Online Academy and author of the award-winning A Guide to the Complex: Contempora­ry Halakhic Debates.

 ?? (kfergos/Flickr) ?? MANY KASHRUT agencies have provided certificat­ion for items such as non-dairy margarine.
(kfergos/Flickr) MANY KASHRUT agencies have provided certificat­ion for items such as non-dairy margarine.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel