The Jerusalem Post

The rules of magic

-

‘I• By EMILY CROY BARKER wish I was rich,” says the little boy, just as most of us have wished at least once in our lives. But this little boy has a magic talisman that grants wishes. Instantly, right in front of his distraught siblings, he is transforme­d into “an elderly gentleman, handsomely but rather dowdily dressed, who was looking down at them through spectacles and asking them the nearest way to the railroad station.” He can’t understand why he finds himself surrounded by unruly children and instead of enjoying his newfound wealth, he heads to his office in London, presumably to make himself still richer.

This sly twist on what at first seems to be a fairly straightfo­rward wish appears in E. Nesbit’s 1907 children’s classic “The Enchanted Castle.” Any lawyer will tell you that vague or ambiguous language is an invitation to trouble. With wishes, as with contracts, it is wise to stipulate the details: exactly how you’d become rich, as well as how rich you’d like to be.

As discipline­s, magic and the law are usually considered to have little in common. One is mystical, otherworld­ly, associated with phenomena that reason can’t comprehend; the other is anchored in the affairs of this world and at least aspires to be governed by logic and principle. And yet, as literature shows us, if you want to dabble in magic safely and successful­ly, it helps to have the advice of a good attorney.

That’s true no matter what kind of magic you practice. Different writers have imagined magic working in various ways, but the best magic always has rules.

One of the most common forms – most humans being nonmagical themselves – is the power that comes from striking a bargain with a magical being. This is where a properly vetted contract is particular­ly important. Spirits and demons tend to have good legal minds, and while they will usually abide by the terms of an agreement, at the time of signing they are under no obligation to

What do lawyers and wizards

have in common? Power

point out provisions that might be unfavorabl­e to the other party. Dr. Faustus might have avoided a lot of trouble if he’d had a lawyer go over his contract with Mephistoph­eles, explaining carefully the consequenc­es of each clause. OTHER WRITERS, like C.S. Lewis, have located the source of magic in a more spiritual dimension. But even in Narnia, magic works according to laws. Facing off against Aslan, the White Witch cites Deep Magic to make her case: “Unless I have blood as the Law says, all Narnia will be overturned.” But what the witch hasn’t counted on is that Aslan knows magic – the law – better than she does. She doesn’t anticipate his return from the dead. “Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time,” he says. “If she could have looked a little further back ... she would have read there a different incantatio­n.” With better counsel, the witch might have come up with a more effective strategy.

There’s also the magic that’s innate in some lucky humans, of whom J. K. Rowling’s Harry Potter is probably the most famous example. Most of the laws involving magic in his world seem to be various restrictio­ns on its use. ( As an underage wizard, Harry gets into trouble for working spells outside of Hogwarts, for instance.) Legal proceeding­s crop up several times in Rowling’s books, and they aren’t very different from the ones in our world. You have the sense that an experience­d Muggle barrister, properly briefed, could hold up his end of a trial in that dungeon courtroom in the Ministry of Magic. ( And perhaps it’s no surprise that Rowling has now written a crime novel starring a distinctly un- magical detective.) In fact, Rowling never quite explains what magic is, although it clearly takes both inborn ability and a lot of study and practice. It’s noteworthy, however, that the final battle between Harry and his nemesis, Voldemort, turns on what’s essentiall­y a question of title: Who is the rightful owner of the Elder Wand? The answer isn’t obvious, but Harry’s rather legalistic explanatio­n carries the day. “’ So it all comes down to this, doesn’t it?’ whispered Harry. ‘ Does the wand in your hand know its last master was Disarmed? Because if it does ... I am the true master of the Elder Wand.’” Voldemort may not be convinced, but the Elder Wand flies to Harry’s hand.

In the end, magic is another form of power, and lawyers understand power. That’s what they do. The law regulates the powers of different parties – of the state, of private individual­s and of corporate bodies – and a lawyer’s task is to find ways to enhance, exploit or rein in those powers.

It may be possible to have a world without magic. It’s doubtful that you can have a world without lawyers.

Emily Croy Barker is the executive editor of The American Lawyer magazine and the author of the forthcomin­g novel “The Thinking Woman’s Guide to Real Magic.”

– © 2013 The New York Times Courtesy: The New York Times Syndicate

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel