UK clothing retailers face Brexit double whammy
Online rivals pose threat • Sellers face higher costs and falling confidence post-Brexit
LONDON (Reuters) – Already hamstrung by the battle to compete with online rivals, Britain’s major clothing retailers now risk a hit to sales and profits from the higher costs and plummeting consumer confidence that have followed the vote to leave the European Union.
A month after that vote, clothing sellers are nursing big share-price falls and contemplating the cost of the depreciation in the pound versus their most important currency, the US dollar.
At the same time, consumer confidence has recorded one of the biggest drops in over two decades. With consumer spending accounting for three-quarters of Britain’s gross domestic product, any drop would have huge implications for the economy.
While a few retailers with big overseas earnings could benefit from the currency move, such as luxury brand Burberry, online fashion retailer ASOS and discount chain Primark, those that will struggle are likely to be British-focused and with already tight margins.
“It was already a tough market,” Andy Street, the managing director of John Lewis, Britain’s biggest department-store chain, said earlier this month. Steve Rowe, the CEO of Marks & Spencer, the nation’s biggest clothing retailer, described confidence as “fragile.”
While steps by clothing retailers to protect themselves from volatility in foreign exchange rates through hedging will provide some breathing space on the currency issue, the hit to confidence is the more immediate threat because Britons typically curtail clothes shopping in hard times.
Market researcher Nielsen polled shoppers after the Brexit vote and found 41 percent planned to change their spending habits to save on household expenses, with clothing and expensive grocery brands in their sights.
In common with all British retailers, clothing sellers were already grappling with intense competition from online-only players and the cost inflation implications of the government-mandated minimum pay rate, the national living wage and increased business rates.
Official data last Thursday showed UK clothing sales were falling even before the referendum. Sales volumes in the three months to June were 5% lower than a year earlier – the worst performance for any calendar quarter in 25 years – and in sharp contrast to a buoyant picture for most other categories of retail.
Now clothing retailers also have to deal with a sharply depreciated pound.
DILEMMA
Sterling has taken the brunt of market concern since the Brexit vote on June 23, falling to a 31-year low and trading below $1.28 on July 6, compared with $1.50 the day before the referendum.
With the bulk of British clothing retailers’ goods sourced from Asian suppliers and paid for in dollars, a weaker pound has a major impact on their buying costs.
Britain’s biggest clothing retailers, including M&S, Next and John Lewis, are hedged up to 18 months ahead. That means if sterling stays depressed, the main impact will not start to be felt until the second half of their 2017-18 financial year.
Sportswear retailer Sports Direct is the notable exception, being unhedged for sterling-dollar for its 2016-17 year. Its share price is down 32% since the vote.
Clothing companies would normally be expected to hedge for the second half of 2017-18 and beyond, now and over the next few months.
But with foreign-currency markets volatile, the treasury departments of firms are reviewing their hedging policies.
They face a dilemma, explained a senior banker with several major British retailers as clients, because as UK interest rates look set to be cut, there is a risk sterling could fall further.
“Now might not be the right time to do it,” he said. “Equally, waiting might not be the right thing to do.”
That unease was echoed by a person with knowledge of the situation at a FTSE 100 clothing retailer.
“You don’t want to be making a decision in July to hedge for 18 months’ time because nobody knows what’s going to happen. You could put yourself in a worse position,” the source said, adding that only the brave would start hedging now.
Faced with higher sourcing costs, one solution could be to pass those costs on to consumers through higher prices.
However, in an already weak market, shoppers will have little appetite for inflation. In the case of M&S, raising prices would run counter to Rowe’s stated strategy of bringing them down to cure the firm’s perceived uncompetitiveness.
The average price of clothing has fallen by 15% in the last 10 years, according to official UK data.
CULTURAL SHIFT
The key for clothing retailers will be their ability to mitigate the cost increases they face.
“There are a number of things that we can do in terms of the sourcing side of things,” said Helen Weir, M&S’s chief finance officer, noting the firm imports £1 billion to £1.5b. ($1.31b.-$1.97b.) worth of goods each year in dollars.
Options include changing the mix of sourcing countries and further increasing the proportion of direct sourcing from factories, cutting out middlemen.
Also, there might be scope to renegotiate better terms with suppliers as Asian currencies have depreciated against the dollar.
Bankers say more radical options would require a cultural shift at retailers.
They could pursue “dual pricing” where they negotiate part payment for supplies in different currencies than the dollar, for example, using the Chinese renminbi.
Retailers could also collaborate more on ordering, shipping and warehousing to seek economy-of-scale savings.
But efficiencies might be more difficult to achieve than in previous years.
“Companies have already materially improved their gross margins through better buying and efficiencies on the supply side,” said Ernesto Bisagno, a senior analyst at ratings agency Moody’s.
Ultimately the clothing sellers with the biggest margins will be best able to weather the storm.
In the UK, Next, Britain’s most successful clothing retailer over the past decade, is the standout stock, with an operating margin for 2015-16 of 20.8%, according to Reuters data.
That dwarfs M&S, at 7.4%, which is diluted by half of its business being in the lower-margin food sector; Debenhams, at 5.8% (for 2014-15); Sports Direct, at 9.4%; and Primark, at 11.9% (for its most recent quarter).
Led by Simon Wolfson, who was among the leading business supporters of Brexit, Next should be well prepared. With some foresight, he had warned in March that 2016 could be the firm’s toughest year since 2008.
With the bulk of British clothing retailers’ goods sourced from Asian suppliers and paid for in dollars, a weaker pound has a major impact on their buying costs