Trump vs. Clinton

You have got to be kidding. Did the person who wrote “No endorsements” (Editorial, August 5) even read what he or she wrote? The whole piece is about wonderful Hillary and the incompetent Trump.

Definitely, Donald Trump is different. But he did not murder four Americans at Benghazi and lie like hell to the FBI.

Show me a pro-Trump cartoon anywhere in the Post for the past six months. Why have you not printed a whole page of letters from readers who are outraged about your pro-Clinton? At least Trump admits to his stupid mistakes and speeches. Hillary? Lie, lie and cover-up.

I will trust my life and this country to Donald J. Trump.

YONATON VORACEK Jerusalem

One of the many reasons I was upset upon reading your August 4 lead headline “Republicans launch effort to bring out Israeli vote for Trump” is that if Donald Trump becomes the next US president, we can kiss the possibility of averting a climate catastrophe goodbye.

While the leaders of 195 nations who met at the Paris climate change conference in December 2015 agreed that major steps must be started right away, Trump would immediately end any US role. While the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is working to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Trump wants to weaken or abolish it. He is ignoring the views of 97 percent of climate experts, 99.8% of peer-reviewed articles in respected science journals, and science academies worldwide.

Those who consider that terrorism is a greater threat should consider that the Pentagon and other military leaders believe there is an increased potential for instability, terrorism and war as tens of millions of desperate refugees flee drought, wildfires, storms, flooding and other effects of climate change.

To leave a decent, livable world for future generations, it is essential that Trump be defeated.

RICHARD H. SCHWARTZ Shoresh