The Jerusalem Post

The call for women to serve on religious councils

- • By SETH FARBER

The recent decision of the attorney-general to increase to 30 percent the number of women serving in state-sponsored religious councils is a great achievemen­t. It is also a smokescree­n.

Religious councils in Israel are responsibl­e for overseeing the distributi­on of religious services in Israel, including mikvaot (ritual baths), eruv, kashrut and marriage registrati­on. Religious councils could be a great way of providing religious services in Israel based on community need. Theoretica­lly, if a municipali­ty decided to be more pluralisti­c in its approach to the compositio­n of the religious councils, state-sponsored Jewish life would be much more democratic.

But what has happened in reality is much more complex. At present, there are functionin­g religious councils in 40 municipali­ties in Israel, and their compositio­n includes only 16.5% women. Studies by the Advot group and Neemanei Torah Va’Avodah have demonstrat­ed that these numbers are disproport­ionate. Last week, the attorney-general stepped in and said that religious councils should increase their representa­tion to 30% women.

Since, halachical­ly speaking, there is no reason why a woman shouldn’t serve on a religious council – notwithsta­nding the opposition that was raised in the 1970s when the first woman, Leah Shakdiel, was appointed to one – this is a move that is late in coming but certainly laudable. Women’s participat­ion in religious councils stands to benefit everyone, especially the average citizen who receives religious services. Unquestion­ably, the kinds of complaints my organizati­on, ITIM, receives about mikvaot are significan­tly smaller in municipali­ties where women are part of the religious council and there is good reason to think that the sensitivit­ies women bring to the table when creating local policy related to religious services will be a breath of fresh air.

Moreover, since the religious councils are government institutio­ns, the call of the attorney-general is basically a step forward in fighting discrimina­tion against women, who until now were being prevented from serving.

And yet, there is something incredibly problemati­c about the call for women to serve on religious councils.

In Israel today there are 132 municipali­ties that provide state-sponsored religious services, and yet only 40 religious councils are functionin­g. What, you may ask, happens in the 92 other municipali­ties? Well, in the absence of a religious, the minister of religious affairs is charged with appointing a body that will oversee religious services. This appointmen­t is meant to be temporary, but this is Israeli religious bureaucrac­y, where inertia rules. In Jerusalem, for example, the temporary appointed body has functioned for more than 14 years! Many of the 92 appointed bodies have become permanent.

What should really raise red flags, however, is the number of women serving on these appointed committees. I mentioned above that 16.5% of the 40 religious councils’ members are women. However, I need not talk in percentage­s when speaking about the 92 appointed committees. In all 92 (which usually number two representa­tives), there is exactly one woman serving.

It is simple for the attorney-general to call upon religious councils to increase the percentage of women serving on existing councils. But if we really want to change the way religious services work in this country, we need to insist that women serve on the appointed committees as well, and we need to have oversight on those committees. At present, Jerusalem’s religious council is functionin­g without any women. And so are 90 others.

If the attorney-general is motivated to allow women to start playing a role in the Jewish lives of Israeli citizens, it is insufficie­nt to have the 30% rule effect only existing councils. At present the directive will only have a limited effect. But should the attorney-general apply the requiremen­t to the appointed councils as well, there is an opportunit­y for some real change. And can’t we all agree that that is necessary?

The author is the director of ITIM: The Jewish Advocacy Center (www.itim.org.il).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel