The Jerusalem Post

‘Hillary’ introduces a new, blunter Clinton – on her marriage, sexism and 2016

- • By MEREDITH BLAKE

LOS ANGELES (Los Angeles Times/TNS) – In January, as her fellow Democrats were crisscross­ing the icy cornfields of Iowa, and her former Senate colleagues were in Washington, DC, bracing for the impeachmen­t trial, Hillary Clinton was in sunny Southern California running on a ticket of a different sort.

The former secretary of state, two-time presidenti­al candidate and human lightning rod, was at the Television Critics Associatio­n (TCA) press tour to discuss the Hulu documentar­y series Hillary, which combines a biographic­al portrait of Clinton with a behind-the-scenes look at her failed 2016 campaign.

When a publicist from the streaming network reminded the audience there would be no post-panel scrum – the traditiona­l offstage huddle with reporters – Clinton joked, “I was sort of looking forward to the scrum.”

She’s certainly willing to mix it up in Hillary,

which was available to stream as of March 6. For a public figure often accused of being inauthenti­c, cagey and overly cautious, the Hillary Clinton on display in the four-part docuseries, directed by Nanette Burstein, is candid and acutely self-aware – not to mention blunt.

Speaking more freely than she might have in her uncharted role as the first female nominee of a major political party, Clinton vents about the burden of being a woman in politics and expresses palpable disdain for former rival Sen. Bernie Sanders. In comments that have already fueled an outraged news cycle, she slams him as an ineffectiv­e career politician disliked by his colleagues in Congress.

If she still suffers from “a responsibi­lity gene,” as she claims at one point in the series, she clearly gives fewer you-know-whats than she once did.

“I thought, you know, now or never. I’m not running for anything. I might as well try to tell my story. Maybe it will be of interest to people,” says Clinton on the morning of her TCA panel. The former first lady sat for 35 hours of probing personal interviews for the series – a difficult process for a figure wary of the media.

“It actually was a very positive experience in the end,” she adds, “though not every minute of every hour was a positive experience.”

In a considerab­ly shorter sit-down with The Los Angeles Times, Clinton touched on a range of subjects outside of politics, including TV – she’s catching up on The Crown and recently had dinner with Fleabag

star Phoebe Waller-Bridge, in case you’re wondering. With a ready laugh and the skilled politician’s habit of addressing people by name during conversati­on, she is engaging and, yes, likable.

But she is also tirelessly on message when it comes to the 2020 election, repeatedly highlighti­ng threats to the integrity of the democratic process. And she doubles down on her criticism of Sanders, suggesting the Vermont independen­t has tolerated and even approved of sexist attacks against her and other women, such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

Hillary arrived three days after Super Tuesday, in the throes of yet another chaotic Democratic primary, when the party is unified in its desire to defeat Trump but divided over which candidate is best equipped to do that. Some have accused Clinton of dredging up the past at a time when Democrats should be focused on the future.

But that’s not how she sees it.

“There is not a week, sometimes not a day, that people don’t approach me, start to cry, and tell me how important the campaign was to them and all of their feelings,” she says. “I would have been, I think, turning my back on the campaign we ran and the policies I put forward if I’d gone away.”

Throughout the 2016 campaign, Hillary Clinton was trailed by videograph­ers who captured roughly 2,000 hours of footage for what might have been a film chroniclin­g the historic election of the country’s first woman president.

It didn’t turn out that way.

After the election, Clinton and her longtime aide, Huma Abedin, met with Propagate Content, a production company with experience in nonfiction storytelli­ng, about the possibilit­y of shaping the material into a different kind of documentar­y.

“IT WAS a great opportunit­y to tell the story of one of the most interestin­g, influentia­l and misunderst­ood politician­s of our time,” says executive producer Howard T. Owens.

It turns out Burstein, co-director of the Robert Evans documentar­y The Kid Stays in the Picture, had also been angling to make a film about Clinton, someone who’s been “a big, emblematic part of my life since my 20s,” she says.

Burstein saw an opportunit­y to create an ambitious, wide-ranging biography that would tie in the history of the women’s movement and the evolution of partisan politics and, hopefully, provide some perspectiv­e on a uniquely polarizing figure in American life.

“People idolize her or they vilify her,” says the director. “She’s so black or white to people. But within that there’s a real human who’s had real experience­s. Let’s unpack that because there’s so much to be learned.”

Woven together from intimate campaign video, interviews with Clinton and her inner circle, and archival footage, Hillary cuts between two time lines: the long, brutal 2016 campaign and Clinton’s life story, following her journey as an ambitious working mother who reluctantl­y changed her name and softened her image once her husband got into politics. Gender is an ever-present theme.

Clinton watched all four hours in one go – “I just took deep breaths a lot” – and stops short of offering criticism. “There were people who were interviewe­d in the film who were surprising to me,” is the closest she gets to negative feedback. “But I didn’t second-guess the decisions [Burstein] made. She knows more than I do about how to put together a film about a complicate­d period in history.”

Clinton describes watching Hillary as an edifying experience, particular­ly when it came to understand­ing how she inadverten­tly fed into the perception that she is evasive or shifty.

“I learned that lots of times I didn’t know how something I said would be taken, and I think I got increasing­ly guarded and gun-shy about really expressing myself as openly or clearly as I should have.”

Though it offers a largely sympatheti­c portrait, Hillary delves into painful moments from Clinton’s decades in public life.

A significan­t amount of time is devoted to her husband’s affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky and the personal and political crises it created. In the series, Clinton reveals she didn’t talk to her husband for weeks after he admitted to the indiscreti­ons, which he’d initially denied. We also hear from Bill Clinton himself, who expresses regret over – but doesn’t quite apologize for – the way Lewinsky’s life was defined by the scandal.

IN PERSON, Clinton says the subject was hard to revisit, even after two decades.

“The whole impeachmen­t saga and the terrible pain in our family and all of that was difficult, as it always is, even to think about,” she says. “Feeling very positive about the decisions that I’ve made in my life, even the most difficult ones, doesn’t make it any easier... I’m glad to be out on the other side of it all these years later.”

Hillary makes the case that Clinton has paid the price for her husband’s missteps, which have been weaponized against her – never more vividly than when Donald Trump invited Bill Clinton’s accusers to an October 2016 debate to deflect attention from the

Access Hollywood tape. Clinton’s decision to stay in her marriage “haunts her in a way that she can never get out from under,” says Jennifer Palmieri, communicat­ions director on the 2016 campaign.

But Clinton rejects the notion that her husband, whom she describes as a “once-in-a-generation political talent,” has cast a shadow over her career.

“Look, what would the alternativ­e be? I married him when I was very young. I never thought I’d run for public office. I decided I’d run for the Senate in 1999, when I was 52 years old. And I think his support, his advice, has been far more positive and helpful to me than anybody else’s.”

Hillary also examines the time-sucking toll of being a woman on the campaign trail. At one point, Clinton estimates she spent 25 days getting her hair and makeup done while she ran for president in 2016 – a far cry from her law school days, when she sported big glasses, frizzy hair and a clean face. She is grateful that Burstein “understood the importance of trying to tell that part of the story,” she says.

“There weren’t any role models for me to compete twice for the presidency, to be the only woman in the stage, to be the object of intense microscopi­c analysis where every single hair and word was analyzed endlessly. I got much more scrutiny than my male counterpar­ts did. I had much less of a margin I could operate on, and I was making it up as I went. I couldn’t go, ‘Oh, well, how did so-and-so do it?’”

Although Clinton grappled with her stunning defeat in the 2017 memoir What Happened, the trauma of the event looms over Hillary – and our conversati­on.

“If I’d lost to a normal Republican, I would have been disappoint­ed but I wouldn’t have been as disturbed and worried as I am,” Clinton tells me. “I thought after the election, well maybe [Trump will] rise to the occasion. Unfortunat­ely, he’s been worse than I thought he would be. I take it very personally because I don’t understand to this day all that happened in that election, and I feel terrible that I couldn’t pull it off despite the headwinds that I faced, because it’s been so awful for our country. Four more years would be really damaging.”

To that end, Clinton tells me she’s spoken to most of the 2020 Democratic contenders – some numerous times – warning them to be ready for more foreign meddling, disinforma­tion on social media, and Republican-led voter suppressio­n.

“Here’s what I say to them: ‘Look, you can run the best campaign, you can get the nomination, and you can still lose because of all these other factors at work,’” she says.

“It’s unbelievab­le. They’re not even trying to hide it. They tried to hide what they did to me. I don’t know. We’re really in a life-or-death political struggle here,” she adds with a mirthless laugh.

And she is adamant that the “life” in life-or-death means nominating “somebody who can beat Trump” in the Electoral College. “Everything else is a sideshow.”

As for who that is, Clinton’s not ready to be that blunt. Yet.

 ?? (Barbara Kinney/Hulu) ?? HILLARY CLINTON in the Hulu documentar­y ‘Hillary.’
(Barbara Kinney/Hulu) HILLARY CLINTON in the Hulu documentar­y ‘Hillary.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel