The Jerusalem Post

Israel received a wake-up call from The Hague

- • By NADAV TAMIR

The decision of the Internatio­nal Criminal Court in The Hague that it has jurisdicti­on over the Israeli-Palestinia­n context arouses a variety of tormenting, yet conflictin­g, thoughts and feelings.

On one hand, the thought that Israeli officers will be prevented from leaving the borders of the state, or, God forbid, will be imprisoned and locked up, makes me cringe. Although I am a peace activist, I am not a pacifist. I have great appreciati­on for the IDF’s role in defending Israel, and in advancing the ability of Israel to promote peace. I have served in a significan­t position in the army and my children also served and are serving, as they were educated to do.

I am frightened that past and present military personnel will pay the price for the arrogance, distorted values and stupidity of the political echelon. As a graduate of the First Lebanon War, I witnessed firsthand the tragic folly of entering into Lebanon, and the long and unnecessar­y stay in Southern Lebanon.

I was much younger, but still remember the unnecessar­y and tragic Yom Kippur War.

If our leaders would have received the outstretch­ed hand of the Egyptian president before instead of after the bloody war we could have avoided much suffering.

Our country is full of unnecessar­y graves and scarred souls and bodies of Israelis who wholeheart­edly believed they were protecting the land. However, they were sent on missions that did not contribute to our protection, and in many cases, they, in fact, damaged our security.

It is not surprising that most senior IDF officials, members of the Mossad and of Shin Bet (Israeli Security Agency) become supporters of peace and the use of diplomatic tools after their retirement – they understand the damage that the current policies are causing to both the physical protection of the state and to our moral values.

Because of this, on the other hand, I look forward to developmen­ts that will constitute a wake-up call for us that we have to end the predicamen­t in which we find ourselves. I am repeatedly shocked by the indifferen­ce of the Israeli public to the reality of the occupation, both morally and in terms of its strategic implicatio­ns for the future of Zionism.

I am also welcoming any internatio­nal recognitio­n of Palestinia­n sovereignt­y and any Palestinia­n access to internatio­nal organizati­ons, with the hope that they will lead to the actual establishm­ent of a Palestinia­n state alongside Israel and prevent the binational catastroph­e, which the current toxic status quo points to.

RECENTLY, THE situation on the ground has worsened, partially because of the Trump administra­tion’s support for the disastrous policies of the Netanyahu government. It is also due to the attempt of the Netanyahu government to establish facts on the ground before the Biden administra­tion completes their appointmen­ts and starts full-time work. There has been an alarming rise in the measures designed to prevent the possibilit­y of a two-state solution to the conflict by allowing new settlement­s, as well as an increase in settler violence against the Palestinia­n population under the auspices of protecting the settlers and their land instead of fighting against the injustices they are committing. These events are hardly reported in the Israeli media and do not interest the majority of the public.

How does one reconcile the horror of the idea that IDF officers will be arrested abroad, with the hope that the Israeli public will remember that we are still occupying another nation and that we will eventually pay a price for it?

I would certainly have preferred that the reminder of the moral and strategic problemati­c nature of the occupation would come from a less problemati­c institutio­n, but since this is the given situation, it is important to promote serious considerat­ion of the Internatio­nal Criminal Court decision. But we should not agree with the hysterical accusation­s of the so-called antisemiti­c motive of the ICC that we have already heard thrown into the air in a “Pavlovic response,” nor the calls to boycott the ICC, which was establishe­d as a lesson from the tragedy of the Jewish people.

We must call on the IDF to investigat­e any wrongdoing­s in a full and transparen­t manner and to ensure that no horrific acts are carried out under its auspices on the ground, as has been happening more and more recently.

We should work hard to end the occupation that eventually corrupts even basic moral individual­s. We have to prevent our leaders from continuing to lead us in the current direction, which is a dead end to our future. I wish we didn’t need such problemati­c reminders to reconcile our problems on the ground.

The writer is the executive director of J Street Israel, a board member of “Mitvim”, the Israeli Institute for Regional Foreign Policy. Nadav served as diplomatic adviser to President Peres, as a diplomat at the Israeli Embassy in Washington and as Consul-General to New England based in Boston. He is also a member of the “Geneva Initiative” Steering Committee.

 ?? (Jerry Lampen/Reuters) ?? THE ENTRANCE of the Internatio­nal Criminal Court in The Hague.
(Jerry Lampen/Reuters) THE ENTRANCE of the Internatio­nal Criminal Court in The Hague.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel