The Jerusalem Post

UK wants new Northern Ireland Brexit deal

- • By MICHAEL HOLDEN and WILLIAM JAMES

LONDON (Reuters) – Britain on Wednesday demanded a new deal to oversee post-Brexit trade involving Northern Ireland, warning the European Union that London would be justified in unilateral­ly deviating from a deal it struck with the bloc just last year.

The Northern Ireland Protocol was agreed to by Britain and the EU as part of a 2020 Brexit deal, finally sealed four years after British voters backed the divorce in a referendum.

It sought to get around the biggest conundrum of the divorce: how to protect the EU’s single market but also avoid land borders between the British province and the Irish Republic, the presence of which politician­s on all sides fear could fuel violence largely ended by a 1998 US-brokered peace accord.

The protocol essentiall­y required checks on goods between the British mainland and Northern Ireland, but these have proven burdensome to business and an anathema to “unionists” who are fiercely supportive of the province remaining part of the United Kingdom.

“We cannot go on as we are,” Brexit minister David Frost told parliament.

He said there was justificat­ion for invoking Article 16 of the protocol, which allowed either side to take unilateral action to dispense with its terms if there was an unexpected negative effect arising from the agreement.

“It is clear that the circumstan­ces exist to justify the use

of Article 16. Neverthele­ss... we have concluded that is not the right moment to do so,” Frost said.

“We see an opportunit­y to proceed differentl­y,” he said: “to find a new path to seek to agree with the EU through negotiatio­ns, a new balance in our arrangemen­ts covering Northern Ireland, to the benefit of all.”

Reuters exclusivel­y reported

on Monday that Britain was considerin­g such a threat.

Frost said Britain wanted a new “balance,” detailed in a command paper – which meant governance of the accord was no longer policed by EU institutio­ns and the European Court of Justice – and a “normal treaty framework” which was “more conducive to the sense of genuine and equitable partnershi­p.”

“These proposals will require significan­t change to the Northern Ireland Protocol,” Frost said. “We do not shy away from that; we believe such change is necessary to deal with the situation we now face.”

Even though customs officials have so far applied a light-touch approach to checking goods entering Northern Ireland from Britain under the protocol, major retailers have said they have struggled to cope with the situation and might need to shift supply chains from the UK to the EU.

Frost called for a “standstill period” which would maintain grace periods already in place with a freeze on existing legal actions.

Britain unilateral­ly extended a grace period for the implementa­tion of full checks due to begin in March covering shipments of chilled meat products, and the EU later agreed this could be extended until the end of September to end a dispute dubbed the “sausage war.”

The introducti­on of full customs checks could become incendiary, one of country’s biggest retailers Marks & Spencer said on Wednesday, as they led to price rises and some products failing to get through due to paperwork checks.

 ?? (Jason Cairnduff/Reuters) ?? LOYALISTS PROTEST against the
NI Protocol, in Belfast earlier this month.
(Jason Cairnduff/Reuters) LOYALISTS PROTEST against the NI Protocol, in Belfast earlier this month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel