The Jerusalem Post

Temple toppled

Activists cry foul after demolition of historic Brooklyn synagogue

- • By LEON KRAIEM

At 4024 Twelfth Avenue in New York’s Borough Park, there now sits a vacant lot, steeped in local history and embroiled in an ugly real estate battle in which civil and religious law intertwine.

The lot was home to Congregati­on Anshei Lubawitz, named for the Russian village that in the late 18th century spawned the ChabadLuba­vitch movement. Chabad, a hassidic dynasty that, having barely survived the Holocaust, has since become one of the dominating forces of 21st-century Jewish life, is more associated with a different Brooklyn neighborho­od, Crown Heights, where the movement’s legendary headquarte­rs sits at 770 Eastern Parkway.

Whether the Anshei Lubawitz of today is in fact a Chabad congregati­on is a matter of dispute. If you ask Asher Gluck, who represents one side of the ongoing real estate controvers­y, the congregati­on’s name is indeed an homage to the spiritual heritage of Lubavitch, but this is a shared lineage, from which the two both descend. Anshei Lubawitz was never an offshoot of the ChabadLuba­vitch movement, Gluck maintains.

Though a somewhat abstruse distinctio­n, this internecin­e controvers­y is now tied up in a yearslong legal battle over who represents the synagogue, and who should determine its future.

Five years ago, a legal entity that presented itself as representi­ng the membership of the congregati­on sold the property on which the synagogue sat to a real estate developer, in exchange for a promise to build the community a new, bigger, and better synagogue, complete with a ritual bath and a study hall, on the first two stories of a condo building.

The synagogue was dilapidate­d, Gluck says, a relic of earlier times and unfit for current use. A full restoratio­n would have been costly, he says, and the congregati­on was not in a financial state to invest that much money in a large-scale renovation project.

But the deal came under fire by a coalition of Chabad community leaders, who viewed the demolished synagogue as part of the movement’s heritage, and a group of disaffecte­d members of the shul, who say they never had a proper vote about whether to sell the property in the first place.

In 2019, the dissenters appealed to the City of New York to grant the synagogue landmark status, precluding its demolition and committing to its maintenanc­e going forward, as a historic place in New York City history. The petition was rejected, but its 30 pages of synagogue history shed some light on why those who opposed the deal viewed the synagogue as more than just another old building.

The synagogue, which was originally built for a congregati­on called Temple Beth El, was believed to be one of the two oldest purpose-built synagogues still in use in the borough of Brooklyn, and the first built and oldest surviving synagogue in Borough Park.

The building was representa­tive of Jewish architectu­re of that era. Its appearance was evocative of Moorish architectu­re, a nod to Judaism’s Eastern origins that was popular in synagogue design at the time. Many of the grand synagogues that now dot Upper Manhattan – Central Synagogue, the cathedral-like structure in Midtown, for example – also allude to the aesthetics of Andalusia.

And though the name of the synagogue suggests an origin in the Reform movement, the synagogue seems to have been occupied from the beginning by a notably traditiona­l congregati­on – indeed, it was dubbed “the most prominent Orthodox congregati­on of Borough Park” in an article from 1909.

More than 100 years later, on the morning of Sunday, March 17, the structure was unceremoni­ously bulldozed. Yaacov Behrman, a Chabad community leader and crucial figure in the movement to oppose the sale of the property, was shocked.

Taking to social media, Behrman – the one and only

@ChabadLuba­vitch on X – assailed the demolition; he accused the developer of violating the terms of an arbitratio­n agreement, and suggested that ritual objects, such as the synagogue’s Torah ark, may have been destroyed, instead of being treated with the proper reverence.

(Gluck says that all holy objects were removed well before the demolition, and that no structure that was part of the building itself had such a status.)

Publicly and privately, the sale’s opponents fulminated against the building’s destructio­n, asserting that the developer and his allies had run roughshod over the terms of an arbitratio­n agreement, arrived at by a rabbinic panel after years of courtroom fighting between the parties.

“In more than four decades of practicing law,” wrote Stuart Blander, a lawyer representi­ng the deal’s opponents, “it is difficult for me to recall anything more outrageous occurring in any case in which I have been associated.” In a letter to the rabbinic arbitrator­s, Blander expressed “shock and horror” at what he called “the unlawful demolition... in plain violation of court orders.”

The rabbinic court’s decision affirmed the original sale’s legitimacy, rejecting a request

by congregati­on members who opposed the deal that the community hold a second vote on the matter prior to moving forward. The decision demanded, however, a performanc­e bond of $5 million – a bond that Gluck says was furnished – and placed a 30-day injunction on any changes to the building, including demolition.

That decision was signed February 29, but Blander alleges that his clients only received the decision after the demolition had already taken place, two weeks after the order was signed.

“They have to follow Jewish law in how they take down the synagogue,” Behrman told New York’s ABC7 the day of the demolition. “None of this was followed.”

On March 22, the chief judge of the arbitratio­n panel weighed in, affirming that, “as of today, the court has still not received a bond,” and warned the developer “not to do anything to the building, or to the ground of the property, or to what remains connected to the ground” until such a bond is received.

What will come of 4024 Twelfth Avenue remains to be seen. There is no longer a synagogue to sue over, for better or worse, and real estate fights in New York City are foolish to bet on. Congregati­on Anshei Lubawitz still exists, and its history as a congregati­on is surely not over, whichever new home it ultimately migrates to. (The congregati­on has not met in the Temple Beth El building for years now anyway.)

BUT IF the synagogue’s constructi­on in 1906 was meant to herald a new era of Jewish life in Borough Park, the acrimony over what should succeed it only testifies to the community’s success in making that vision a reality.

An estimated 100,000 Jews now live in Borough Park, including several hassidic communitie­s, a non-hassidic ultra-Orthodox community, a Sephardi community, and a smaller Modern Orthodox community to boot. Borough Park hosts the headquarte­rs of the Bobov Hassidic dynasty, and the Satmar Hassidic movement hosts several of its boys’ schools as well as its largest girls’ school in the neighborho­od as well.

In 1906, the entire Jewish community – about 400 families – is said to have gathered at the ceremony to lay the cornerston­e for Temple Beth El. The event included speeches by the Brooklyn borough president and by a lawyer named Michael Furst, who was eulogized in 1934 as “the grand old man of Brooklyn Jewry.”

Most notably, perhaps, the event was attended by the 14th Regiment band, which played the American national anthem as the cornerston­e of the synagogue was laid. The borough president, bragging that “there are more Jews in this great city of ours than in any other city of the earth,” noted that “as time goes on [the Jews] are beginning to play an important part in the workings of this great nation.”

For all of American Jewry’s consternat­ion about rising antisemiti­sm and the future of Jewish life in the country, no one could deny the significan­ce of what Furst observed at the time.

Though we cannot know today what Rabbi Hirschowit­z – Beth El’s first leader, who retired to Palestine and is buried on the Mount of Olives – would say about the loss of Borough Park’s first synagogue, he would surely be glad to know that it wasn’t, and will not be, the neighborho­od’s last.

 ?? (Chevraansh­ei1 via Wikimedia Commons) ?? THE ANSHEI LUBAWITZ synagogue of Borough Park, which was demolished earlier this month.
(Chevraansh­ei1 via Wikimedia Commons) THE ANSHEI LUBAWITZ synagogue of Borough Park, which was demolished earlier this month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel