Jamaica Gleaner

Please save our girls

- St Rachel Ustanny Contributo­r St Rachel Ustanny, MSc, BSc (Hons) is CEO of the Jamaica Family Planning Associatio­n. Send feedback to columns@gleanerjm.com.

OUR FUTURE depends on the success of our girls, yet their sexual and reproducti­ve health and rights (SRHR) are disregarde­d and minimised every day. It is not uncommon to hear Jamaicans say, ‘Is just a little sex’. The recent allegation of rape of a 15-year-old girl by a 64-year-old pastor, if true, is just one example of the denial of the SRHR of our girls.

National statistics reveal that the Government routinely fails to protect our girls and empower them to act against SRHR violations, which leaves them vulnerable and threatens Jamaica’s ability to realise Vision 2030 and the Sustainabl­e Developmen­t Goals (SDGs).

There is evidence that the health and safety of our girls are at risk. The adolescent fertility rate is 18 per cent of all births annually; girls are four to five times more likely to be infected by HIV than boys; 48.8 per cent of adolescent girls and 16 per cent of adolescent boys did not consent to sex the first time; the average age of initial sex for girls and boys is 14 years; and there is declining knowledge of HIV among adolescent­s and youth.

Jamaica spends more than US$2,000 per year to provide health-care services for each adolescent mother. In 2012, there were more than 6,900 births to adolescent­s, which enables us to approximat­e an annual expenditur­e of over J$1.07 billion to care for adolescent mothers in that year.

Girls have limited knowledge about their human rights. They routinely lack the knowledge and skills needed to be key actors in solving SRHR problems. The current abstinence-only approach adopted by the Health and Family Life Education curriculum fails to take into considerat­ion the needs of girls who are at risk of violation of their sexual and reproducti­ve rights.

Further, the laws do not permit girls under 16 years old to access the health technologi­es needed to protect them from unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitte­d infections. Laws protecting SRHR are weak in their protection of girls’ and women’s SRHR in different contexts: the workplace, in public, at home, when underage, when disabled, and to address the needs of the aged female population.

The discussion about the alleged rape of the 15-year-old girl by the Moravian pastor is devoid of an examinatio­n of her SRHR; the financial and developmen­tal implicatio­ns of SRHR violations on the nation; and the legislativ­e deficienci­es around gender-based violence (GBV). In other jurisdicti­ons, the accused Moravian pastor, if found guilty, would be labelled a paedophile. By labeling him a rapist, as opposed to a paedophile; he is relieved of the full implicatio­n of his crime.

Support for the these persons promotes the institutio­nalisation of SRHR violations against women and girls; encourages intergener­ational sex, which is a leading cause of girls’ disproport­ionate HIV infection rate when compared to boys; perpetuate­s gender inequality; and vilifies the victim.

Women and girls constitute the majority of the membership of the Church, therefore, an ongoing campaign promoting SRHR and gender equality is a fitting action for the Church to undertake to support the advancemen­t of women and girls.

I call on Prime Minister Andrew Holness to urgently establish a technical multisecto­ral committee comprised of specialist organisati­ons in SRHR to design a comprehens­ive strategic response to address the problem of GBV and lack of protection of women’s and girls’, as well as boys’ SRHR. This committee is essential because an effective response will require attention to individual competency issues, interventi­on strategies/approaches, the legal and policy environmen­t, capacity developmen­t of implementi­ng agencies, reporting and redress mechanisms, and availabili­ty of and access to quality sexual and reproducti­ve health services.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Jamaica