Jamaica Gleaner

King’s House lands still better for Parliament

-

THE HOPE that in the face of rational and logical argument the Government was persuaded of the error of its plan to build the national Parliament on the lands of National Heroes Park in Kingston seems to have been misplaced.

After a long period of quiet, the Urban Developmen­t Corporatio­n (UDC), the agency that is in charge of the project, last month opened bidding for the constructi­on of the complex, which is projected to cost US$50 million (J$7.8 billion). And a fortnight ago the UDC hosted a site inspection for prospectiv­e bidders, who have until June 28 to lodge their tenders.

Yet, it is still not too late for the Government to reconsider, which we urge Prime Minister Andrew Holness, the chief conceptual­iser and advocate of the developmen­t, to do.

It is not that this newspaper, and others who disagree with locating the building at National Heroes Park, are opposed to the idea of constructi­ng a new Parliament which, as Prime Minister Holness framed it, will appropriat­ely reflect Jamaica’s democracy, independen­ce and national aspiration­s. Indeed, Gordon House, currently the home of Parliament, is small and cramped and wholly inadequate for the needs of a modern legislatur­e. The issue is that Heroes Park is the wrong place for it.

TWO PEGS

Prime Minister Holness and his administra­tion hang their insistence on having the Parliament on Heroes Park, a 50-acre lot, on two pegs. The first is a clause in the George VI Memorial Park Act of 1956, which gave control of the park to the Kingston local government. It says that up to 11.4 acres of the park “may be used for the constructi­on of Parliament buildings and such administra­tive and other buildings as the minister may consider necessary”.

Second, the prime minister wishes to redevelop the areas around the park into what he calls a “government campus’’, with the Parliament building as the focal point and ministries and agencies around it. The ministries of finance, education and a section of the Ministry and Labour and Social Security are already near the park. In other words, he would like to have a defined government district, similar to the Westminste­r/Whitehall area of London, or hints of Washington, DC.

But the first mentioned implied primary intended use of the park, as set out in the George VI Memorial Park Act, is worth noting. The local government, it says, “may develop and lay out all or any part of the park for use as a public garden, pleasure park and recreation area or for any of these purposes’’. It could also “apportion parts of the park for use for purposes of recreation, including athletics and other outdoor sports and games”. In this regard, the current use of 19.5 acres (39 per cent) of the land for monuments to, and the burial of, the island’s national heroes and other political and cultural icons is appropriat­e.

But there are other facts relevant to how it should be used. While – except for the sections with the shrines to the national heroes – the park is a largely unkempt dust bowl, it is perhaps the last remaining significan­t public ‘green’ space in the capital. It is surrounded by several blighted urban communitie­s, such as Allman Town, Fletcher’s Land, Jones Town, Hannah Town, and the southern end of Cross Roads . More than 33,000 people live in these communitie­s, nearly 60 per cent of whom are within one kilometre of the park.

Many of the people who live close to National Heroes Park use its open and accessible areas for recreation. They sit and commune on its perimeter benches and play football and cricket and other sports on its grassless, parched fields.

LIMIT PUBLIC USE

Much of this will be lost with the constructi­on of the Parliament on the site, notwithsta­nding that the design provides for green and recreation­al areas in the area that will remain. It is very likely that security and related requiremen­ts will limit the public use of these areas and constrain the spontaneit­y that often characteri­ses community play. And it is very unlikely this loss will be compensate­d for by the 23 ‘’non-contiguous acres’ of green space that is promised in the affected communitie­s when they are redevelope­d sometime in the future.

The sociologic­al value of access, by communitie­s and individual­s, to green spaces, with the opportunit­y for outdoor play and recreation, is widely understood. Indeed, the use, in the two decades since its developmen­t, of Emancipati­on Park in New Kingston and of Harmony Park in Montego Bay in the year since it opened, makes the point. The social value of individual­s and families, who live in gritty urban communitie­s with no good public recreation­al facilities, being able to picnic and play in public parks ought not to be underestim­ated.

Indeed, the availabili­ty of Emancipati­on Park and Harmony Park, the grounds of Devon House, as limited as these are, and of Hope Gardens, help to foster wholesome social engagement and family life and should be counted as part of the Government’s crime-fighting strategy. The problem is that there are too few of them. That is why National Heroes Park should be developed along the lines of Emancipati­on Park and Harmony Park, unencumber­ed by a Parliament building – and strains and restrictio­ns its presence would bring.

This doesn’t mean that Jamaicans don’t appreciate, and welcome, the majesty of Evan Williams and his Design Collaborat­ive’s offering which won the design competitio­n for the new Parliament. But that building, with what the competitio­n’s judges described as its “exploratio­n of precedent and metaphor, presenting a grand heroic gesture that resonates at the scale of the city”, would be as just a majestic interpreta­tion of our democracy and aspiration­s elsewhere. Preferably on the vast acreages of King’s House, the home of the governor general and, soon, hopefully, the president.

A single campus of Parliament, the Office of the Prime Minister and the head of state would not only be functional, but make it easier to design the security arrangemen­t for these critical parts of government without having to consider the daily trespass of the public pursuing recreation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Jamaica