The Japan News by The Yomiuri Shimbun
U.S. backs Japan efforts to boost deterrence
Interview with U.S. Ambassador Rahm Emanuel
U.S. Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel sat down with Yomiuri Shimbun Staff Writer Yuya Yokobori to express his thoughts on Japan’s efforts to strengthen its defense capabilities. The following, edited for clarity, are excerpts from the interview.
The Yomiuri Shimbun: How do you view Japan’s discussions on strengthening its defense capabilities?
Rahm Emanuel: Given what North Korea, China and Russia are doing, they are appropriately taking a look at what is the right response in collaboration with the United States, their most important ally. We have found in the last 10 months a lot of things have changed based on a certain set of assumptions going back to the time when I worked for [former U.S.] President [Barack] Obama, and so we’re in the process of that reanalysis. What are the policy implications? What are the resource deployments? So Japan is doing the same thing. And it would be anything but irresponsible not to do that. When Prime Minister Fumio Kishida was rst elected, he said he wanted to update three security documents. at was ahead of the curve; I compliment both the prime minister and his leadership team.
Yomiuri: If Japan manages to achieve the goal of getting defense spending to 2% of its GDP, will it give more diplomatic power to Japan?
Emanuel: Japan has tremendous respect in the international arena. So when you say does it add [diplomatic power]? Yes, it adds.
Yomiuri: Former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe used to stress that an emergency in Taiwan means an emergency in Japan. As China becomes more assertive, it seems that this view is gaining momentum within Japan. How do you view this development?
Emanuel: When China was deciding to conduct the exercises around Taiwan a er [U.S. House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi’s visit, [Chinese President] Xi [Jinping] had a choice. He decided consciously to re ve missiles into the Japanese EEZ [Exclusive Economic Zone]. Japan’s southwest islands are 70 miles [about 110 kilometers] from Taiwan.
You don’t need me to say what that means. President Xi told you how they view Japan. He sent you a message.
Yomiuri: What are your views on so-called counterstrike capabilities?
Emanuel: Obviously, Japan is going to consult with the United States. But they’ll self-determine what’s in their self-interest. ey know what we can do, where the United States is, and where the threats are. Now they have to gure out what they bring to enhance not only Japan’s security, but also enhance the overall deterrence of the alliance. ey know what it takes to be the full partner they want to be and what it means to have security enhanced.
Yomiuri: e new U.S. national security strategy mentions the Senkaku Islands for the rst time.
Emanuel: Our obligations under Article 5 [of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty] extend to the Senkaku Islands. Obviously, anything that was to be done by a hostile entity to the Senkakus we see as a direct threat to Japan and would act accordingly. Part of getting ahead of that is deterrence. So we would act in a reaction. One of the things that we’re working on together is strengthening our deterrence, which means the exercises in the region near the islands, and exercises in the southwest islands.
Yomiuri: How do you see the future of the U.S.-Japan alliance considering Japan’s strengthening defense capabilities?
Emanuel: ere’s a lot that comes into the de nition of security and power projection.
The military is part of that. But if that becomes your only tool, you’re actually leaving other pieces of your power presence, and the projection of that power, on the sidelines. If you’re trying to project power in the enhancement of your national interest, you want to bring all of Japan. Your economic integration and trade with other countries — that’s power. Your investment in other countries’ development — that’s power. Does the military come to it? One hundred percent. Is it a big piece of it? One hundred percent. But if you make it the only game, then you have to succeed [at] that. (Nov. 13)