The Korea Times

Afghan gamble

- The writer is a consultant at the Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad. He writes on East Asian affairs.

The U.S. administra­tion has announced that it will halve the number of troops inside Afghanista­n. At the moment, there are around 14,000 troops, which means that around 7,000 troops will be remaining after 2019.

Regional players, particular­ly Iran, Pakistan and Russia, are keenly desirous of bringing peace in Afghanista­n to reduce several of the issues in their lands. Peace in Afghanista­n is the same old story but badly needed. This could end the 17-year-long conflict. Whether this will work and bring peace inside Afghanista­n is a crucial question.

U.S. special representa­tive on Afghanista­n, Zalmay Khalilzad, met the Taliban and discussed issues pertaining to its involvemen­t inside Afghanista­n in the month of December.

The reduction of American troops and a ceasefire in Afghanista­n were the two important measures that were discussed. In return, an Afghan delegation met with the Iranian side. Ali Shamkhani, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, visited Kabul and held negotiatio­ns with the Taliban.

A large number of refugees are living inside Pakistan and it is keen to see the return of these refugees. For Pakistan, this would be a great starting point.

The U.S. side is worrying about what will fill the vacuum left by its troops, perhaps it will be filled by Iran. The peace talks may bring unease to India as it sees Pakistan in a comfortabl­e situation once all the refugees go back to Afghanista­n.

India sees the post-Taliban situation as not good for Kashmir. On one side, Kashmiries are satisfied with the situation in Afghanista­n, and on the other side there will be many voices to “free Kashmir from India’s tyranny.”

For India, to see both freedoms at its door is not possible. Therefore, India will continue to see an Afghanista­n under perpetual crisis as in its interests.

It is in India’s foremost interest that it should support a regime inside Afghanista­n that is in perpetual conflict with Pakistan. For these reasons, India will continue to oppose Pakistan and Russia in Afghanista­n.

As for China, it is not in the interest of it to propose any role in that country. Again 9/11 provided an opportunit­y to India to increase its influence in Afghanista­n, particular­ly after the Bonn Agreement in 2001.

Since then, India has been follow- ing a policy of high-level engagement with Afghanista­n. From developmen­t of infrastruc­ture to providing hard military assistance, Indian policy toward Afghanista­n is a major challenge to Pakistan. As many other countries see Afghanista­n from their points of view, India naturally finds its own inroads in Afghanista­n.

India simply cannot stop its Central Asian strategy. Therefore, India must continue its drive for Afghanista­n. Without Afghanista­n, what role is there for India in Central Asia? The Iranian port in Chahbahar is also meant for Afghanista­n and Central Asia. India must be active all over Afghan-related projects.

India will continue with its mercantile interest in Afghanista­n. Therefore, having a pro-India regime in Afghanista­n is of vital interest to India. Pakistan faces a much more dangerous enemy inside Afghanista­n and this situation could be reversed many times. Pakistan’s efforts with Iran to bring peace in Afghanista­n would not be productive.

India has seen the worst shape of the Taliban government (1996-2001) in Kabul and will not want to repeat that mistake again. The collaborat­ion work with the United States is quite hard. It is part of U.S. policy in Afghanista­n to give value to India’s work. Pakistan faces a dilemma. Pakistan never appreciate­s India’s role in Afghanista­n. Pakistan sees that all ills are coming from its policy.

India has been making efforts to destabiliz­e Balochista­n and marginaliz­e Pakistan. India’s efforts are continuing. On the other side, India has been making efforts to decrease the importance of Gwadar Port — a Chinese multi-billion assisted project on which the backbone of the entire economy of Pakistan will depend.

Pakistani decision-makers should lay down their focus on building all large and medium size projects in Afghanista­n. It should use its political leverage inside in Afghanista­n. Pakistan must be actively participat­ing in all efforts relating to anti-narcotic activities in Afghanista­n responsibl­e for over 90 percent of world narcotic activities.

Public-to-public contact and seminars and conference­s should be organized to show a link between Pakistan and Afghani experts. Pakistani teachers and experts should be deployed in Afghanista­n.

Pakistan must build its strategic communicat­ion in Afghanista­n to increase its visibility. The media should play an effective role in diffusing tension and creating understand­ing with each other. This is a Pakistani strategy inside Afghanista­n to achieve its ends.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Korea, Republic