The Korea Times

Innovation agenda for Europe

- By Manuel Muniz and Marietje Schaake Manuel Muniz is dean of the IE School of Global and Public Affairs in Madrid. Marietje Schaake was a member of the European Parliament from the Netherland­s from 2009-19. Copyright belongs to Project Syndicate (www. pro

BRUSSELS/MADRID — The European Union’s new leadership team must reform and deepen the bloc and strengthen its global influence. Making Europe much more innovative should therefore be at the top of the priority list.

There is no time to waste. The rapid growth of the digital economy is creating a technologi­cal G2 world dominated by the United States and China, with Europe a distant third.

Not even one European firm is ranked among the world’s largest internet companies. Most technology “unicorns” — privately held startups valued at over $1 billion — are outside the EU. And tech hubs such as Shenzhen or Silicon Valley currently dwarf anything that Europe has to offer.

If EU leaders allow these trends to continue, Europe will find itself unable to meet the geostrateg­ic challenges of the 21st century. An outdated industrial and technologi­cal base will be unable to support a resilient and effective data infrastruc­ture, and will thus limit Europe’s strategic autonomy.

With technology and innovation having become important arenas for Sino-American great-power rivalry, Europe must raise its collective game to avoid being caught in the middle.

There are also strong economic reasons for Europe to act with greater urgency. For starters, companies that make heavy use of technology are known to be more productive and competitiv­e.

The OECD estimates that the most productive of these companies — what it calls “frontier firms” — accounted for almost all of the productivi­ty growth in advanced economies during the past decade. Such companies also create most of the high-quality and high-paying jobs in a modern economy.

If too much of Europe’s corporate sector remains low-tech and uncompetit­ive, its workforce will face an increasing­ly precarious future, and the best and brightest employees may move to other parts of the world.

Moreover, an unproducti­ve private sector generates lower tax revenues. Without enough profitable firms and high-paying jobs, government­s across Europe will face funding challenges and additional pressure on public budgets.

Given the high stakes for Europe of being either a digital leader or laggard, the EU urgently needs a radically ambitious innovation and technology agenda. This should be a long-term effort in which stronger cooperatio­n among European partners plays a central role.

We foresee three strategic priorities. First, Europe must build an ecosystem of universiti­es and research centers that can attract talent from around the world. These clusters, like those that underpin every major global innovation hub, would not only provide world-class training, but also generate applied knowledge that can be transforme­d into high-impact companies and projects.

In particular, Europe needs academic institutio­ns that bring together the best minds from the research world, industry, the financial sector, and the entreprene­urial community.

Such institutio­ns should measure their success by the number of startups that are launched in their incubators, the number of jobs created by their spin-offs, and their overall contributi­on to local, regional, and national economic growth. Unless this shift occurs, Europe’s academic infrastruc­ture will not be fit for purpose in the 21st century.

Second, the EU must complete the digital single market in order to encourage greater innovation. Digital markets need to be large to be successful, yet Europe is still fragmented by unnecessar­y barriers.

Innovative digital firms that want to operate across the EU must navigate numerous regulation­s and norms that make it harder for them to scale up, hindering their competitiv­eness.

U.S. and Chinese technology companies are thriving in large part because they have huge domestic markets that enable the growth they need to expand internatio­nally.

EU leaders must therefore double down on deepening European integratio­n and expanding markets through multilater­al cooperatio­n. Furthermor­e, the EU’s trade agreements should include standard chapters on digital trade in order to ensure a level playing field both at home and abroad.

Third, the EU must remain alert to malpractic­e and competitio­n challenges in the digital economy. Digitaliza­tion has produced winner-take-all markets, and the digital economy contains strong oligopolis­tic forces. Firms that have access to data and the capacity to process it tend to fare better than those that do not.

The clearest sign of growing market concentrat­ion may be the lack of diffusion of productivi­ty gains from frontier firms to others. Wage stagnation, the declining share of wages in national income, and the weakening of collective-bargaining procedures also point to a lack of market competitio­n.

The EU is obliged to ensure free and fair competitio­n within its markets. Having introduced its General Data Protection Regulation in 2018 to give EU citizens more control over their personal data, Europe’s leaders must continue to ensure that the rule of law applies online as well as offline, and that competitio­n in the digital economy is fair.

Such a values-driven or norms-compliant approach to innovation would benefit Europeans and people around the world.

Europe has the human capital, infrastruc­ture, institutio­nal capacity, and financial and corporate resources to be a global leader in technology and innovation.

With bold, swift action, the EU’s new leaders can build a model that creates ripple effects around the world. And instead of being an innovation laggard, Europe could become an example for others to follow.

 ??  ?? Marietje Schaake
Marietje Schaake
 ??  ?? Manuel Muniz
Manuel Muniz

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Korea, Republic