The Korea Times

Black Lives Matter, mismanagem­ent

- This editorial was produced for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and distribute­d by Tribune Content Agency.

A closer inspection of the nonprofit tax form filed by the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation reveals even more unseemly details about the group’s financial mismanagem­ent than previously known. The group came under initial scrutiny after New York Magazine reported that the organizati­on had secretly purchased a $6 million mansion in Los Angeles that had occasional­ly served for board members’ private enjoyment.

Black Lives Matter was founded in 2013 after a self-appointed neighborho­od security enthusiast stalked and killed Black teenager Trayvon Martin in Florida, then was acquitted. The movement’s funding and following grew dramatical­ly in 2014 after an officer shot and killed Michael Brown Jr. in Ferguson.

The causes were absolutely the right ones: promoting social justice and organizing to fight all forms of racial oppression. But the group’s founders were rank amateurs who apparently had no idea how to run a nonprofit and ensure proper financial management so that generous donations weren’t wasted or abused.

Local Black Lives Matter chapters formed across the country, with 12 of them receiving grants of $500,000 each, The Associated Press reported. Family foundation­s formed in honor of Martin received $200,000 contributi­ons, while the foundation formed by Brown’s mother, Lezley McSpadden, received $1.4 million.

But the big money was doled out internally. More than $2.1 million went to Bowers Consulting for operationa­l support, staffing and fundraisin­g. That firm belongs to Shalomyah Bowers, the foundation’s former deputy executive director. Another $840,000 went to Cullors Protection LLC, owned by the brother of Patrisse Cullors, the foundation’s co-founder and executive director. Another $970,000 went to a company founded by Damon Turner, the father of Cullors’ child.

In all, this has the distinct odor of personal enrichment and nepotism. It’s hardly the first time philanthro­py has been abused, nor is it the first time that those caught in the act offered up flimsy excuses. Despite being 9 years old, it wasn’t until recently that the organizati­on filled out its first

Those forms are available for public inspection specifical­ly so that donors can track the group’s efficiency. If a nonprofit steers a lot of funding toward administra­tion and compensati­on, that’s a clear warning sign of wasteful practices — meaning that donations won’t be going to the good cause donors intended.

The natural tendency of people horrified by tragedies such as those involving Martin, Brown and Floyd is to donate generously. That’s good. But the first order for donors must be to ensure the organizati­on and its leaders are qualified to deploy the funds properly.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Korea, Republic