The Korea Times

Rational quitters

- By Kim Jong-nam Kim Jong-nam is the founding CEO of Culture Engine (www.cultureeng­ine.co.kr), which specialize­s in organizati­onal culture change via consulting, training and coaching.

Quiet quitting has become a generation­al trend for millennial­s and Generation Z. According to research done by Gallup, more than 50 percent of them refuse to work more than required and think that merely meeting the job descriptio­n is enough. Some people interpret this situation as meaning that these generation­s are lazier and more selfish. However, looking at some related data made me believe that this quiet quitting trend is not lazy but rather positively rational.

This means that corporatio­ns need to deal with the consequenc­es of an unhappy workplace by doing their duty, which, first of all, means understand­ing what reasons and values exist behind such seemingly quiet but in reality loud quitting. I am speaking here based on the results of organizati­onal culture diagnoses that I have done for more than 30,000 employees at 10 companies this year.

First, their needs are not that different from those of other generation­s. Like other generation­s, millennial­s and Gen Z are not happy with inadequate salaries, promotion rates, benefits or treatment by corporatio­ns. In addition, these generation­s have begun to gauge the amount of effort and contributi­on they give to companies against what they get from companies in return, and also compare it to what they might get at other companies. This collective behavior is based on their values of equity and justice.

Second, their level of tolerance for conservati­ve and rigid organizati­onal culture is very low. If there are unjust or absurd events in their corporatio­ns, they expect measures to address them. They feel antipathy toward old-fashioned cultures that have not caught up with the changes. Just as corporatio­ns want their employees to work in a more modern way, employees are requesting their companies to do the same. This collective behavior is based on their values of equality and reciprocit­y.

Third, their thirst for an alignment of vision between organizati­ons and themselves as individual­s is much stronger. They are much more concerned about their organizati­on’s potential future paths and dislike any uncertaint­y about growth both for the company and for themselves. They have much bigger expectatio­ns for their own career growth and their company’s growth, and would like these to go hand-in-hand. This collective behavior is based on their values of growth and developmen­t. They are also interested in how to increase the positivity of their corporate brand and image.

Fourth, organizati­onal rationalit­y has become a norm for them. They tend to think that they can evaluate their organizati­ons’ systems just as they are evaluated by their organizati­ons on whether they are working methodical­ly and in an organized way. Indeed, they would like their corporatio­ns to work methodical­ly and in an organized way as well. They have a very low tolerance for unclear HR management systems or a backlog of people due for promotions that never arrive.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Korea, Republic