The Korea Times

South Korea needs to recharge foreign engagement

- Eugene Lee Eugene Lee (mreulee@gmail.com) is a lecturing professor at the Graduate School of Governance at Sungkyunkw­an University in Seoul. Specializi­ng in internatio­nal relations and governance, his research and teaching focus on national and regional s

As the political drama of the recent general elections slowly winds down and gradually subsides, the question of what needs to be done next stands as urgent as ever, particular­ly in the sphere of internatio­nal relations.

South Korea, a leading technologi­cal innovator and economic force in the East Asian economy, has traditiona­lly focused its internatio­nal engagement on its immediate region and establishe­d allies like the United States.

However, the escalating polarizati­on between the U.S. and China, compounded by developmen­ts in Ukraine and the Middle East, present new challenges for South Korea.

Analyzing economic data from the last five years, sourced from entities like The Economist or Korea Customs Service and incorporat­ing insights from political analysts reveals several discernibl­e trends.

First of all, the trading world is not exactly what it used to be. The COVID-19 pandemic had its negative impact and economies are still trying to recuperate from it. As a result, the trade landscape appears quite tumultuous.

Secondly, geopolitic­s also plays a significan­t role. As the countries are realigning their trading along their alliances, they tend to strengthen relations with certain partners while weakening ties with those who are siding with adversarie­s.

The third one is the advancemen­t in technology. Here I am talking about advanced technologi­es, like ultra-precision and micromanuf­acturing, nanoimprin­t lithograph­y and AI semiconduc­tors.

Next come new energy technologi­es, like fast-charging and high-density EV batteries and advanced photovolta­ics in production of efficient solar panels.

Most of South Korea’s partners have made big changes and, in some case, big advances — look at the U.S. or China who are forging forward with their renewable energy projects. Japan and Taiwan are not far behind, with significan­t investment­s being made in bleeding-edge technologi­es. It seems Korea is somewhat lagging behind.

The question that begs for an answer is why Korea hasn’t been able to adjust to those changes effectivel­y. Once again, most analysts would point towards domestic politics.

The past three months have shown a critical gap in South Korea’s foreign policy — a neglect of fostering stronger ties with other states.

For example, at the end of last month, the United Nations Security Council failed to extend the mechanism monitoring member states’ compliance with and enforcemen­t of the U.N. sanctions regime on North Korea, as Russia decided to veto the extension of the mandate.

Some argue that this outcome was unavoidabl­e, pointing to the rift between the U.S. and Russia.

Indeed, there has been a noticeable deteriorat­ion in the U.N. sanctions regime since 2019.

However, it is conceivabl­e that preventive diplomacy could have mitigated this process. Even in the aftermath, it is still possible to sustain the effort by engaging countries and groups, for example the EU or G7, directly. In other words, we need a more proactive state diplomacy.

Speaking of the EU, in February President Yoon Suk Yeol canceled a state visit to Germany and Denmark.

And that has played against South Korea’s national interests. Germany currently is promoting its China Strategy which seeks to de-risk its ties with China, a lesson from the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The visit could have been an opportunit­y to welcome German businesses seeking to relocate from China.

In March, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz met with the Malaysian prime minister, Philippine president and Thai prime minister in one week resulting in cooperatio­n agreements.

The Danes were able to minimize the fallout by sending their delegation led by the Minister of Climate, Energy and Utilities in return.

The visit ended in signing an agreement to install offshore wind farms in Korea, a boon for the Danish businesses and promised energy returns six years later for South Korea.

Then there is silence regarding the scheduled visit to Central Asia in April. Beyond their abundant natural resources, Central Asian states share interests in South Korea’s technologi­cal advancemen­ts, education, labor, renewable energy and smart cities.

While South Korea’s current focus on trade with China is significan­t, it has left untapped potential for collaborat­ion with Central Asia in these rapidly growing sectors.

And then there was Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s visit to Washington a week ago. You might be wondering if it really matters? Actually, it does.

The outcome was over 70 agreements in defense, business, culture and research. Among these, cooperatio­n on the F-35 jet and space programs is exactly what Korea needs. In fact, some see this visit as the most important since World War II, as it raised the profile of Japan and also changed its stance in the global arena.

The implicatio­ns of this visit are critical for South Korean defense. For example, as it elevates the level of engagement between Japan and the U.S., it may change expectatio­ns regarding how U.S. assets located here are used in the event of a conflict involving Taiwan.

This could be of paramount importance in case of any escalation on the peninsula.

State visits are important events — they are scheduled months in advance. It is like a complicate­d dance between two countries — diplomats behind scenes work hard preparing and making them successful.

And when they do take place, the president is like a big guarantor — allows many business agreements to get a different scale support — on intergover­nmental level, and get government backing, i.e. it is like the best insurance one can get. Many business agreements may not be realized but if they do, they become pillars of relations between two countries.

So, it should be our head of state traveling and getting the best deals for the country. It isn’t that any inaction breeds trouble.

I’d go a step further by saying, any inaction breeds prejudice towards you, and how other states treat you. So, ideas of “Korea passing” or “North Korea discount” are largely of our own making.

If we want a better future for our country, we cannot just sit around — we have to move, meet others and, by shaping those attitudes towards ourselves, make things happen.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Korea, Republic