Iran’s Freezing ambitions nuclear

II. War World ing with differences The applyeviscerate today

analogy. that ing GerNazi isn’t Iran United the is Nor many. 1936. in Britain States caragreement the And, mathe of weight the ries the of powers global jor if Last, One. Plus 5P- likethe fails, freeze this be will force that lihood setor eliminate to used and( nuclear Iran’s back portion good a probably is capacity military) its of more far possibly and real

result. a as likely comwho those For negotiating that plain folis adversaries with The matters. history ly, negotiatStates United Korea in China with ed with and war that during years 20 Vietnam North and Americans when later killed being were allies

battlefield. the on China, to went Nixon and enemy, S.U. a then control arms negotiated wicked the with treaties

China. Soviet Assad Bashar that Last, Syria’s destroy to agreed sugweapons chemical be might Iran that gests decthe honor to prepared supreme its of larations nuclear calling leaders and immoral weapons would Iran that promising

them. acquire never first a is freeze The a isn’t hope While step. this hopes one strategy, beginthe of end the is of beginning the and ning nuclear Iran’s of end the toughthe But ambitions.

ahead. lies part est, 20 to enriched uranium en-medium- -- percent while -- uranium riched and transparent accepting international intrusive

inspection. stage, some at And, must House White the that public the remind S.-U. bilateral a isn’t this other five that -- deal Iran Eurothe and countries equally are Union pean

engaged. freeze the said, That poa provoke still will Fordonnybrook. litical the of issue the tunately, specnot enrich, to right Prolif-Non- the in ified been has Treaty, eration

finessed. Korea, North Beyond support to tends history the favoring arguments analMunich The freeze. releas cited be will ogy ChamberNeville vant. our in peace“declared lin Adolf appeasing time” Munich at 1938 in Hitler Nathe giving mistakenly invade to blanche carte zis start- later year a Poland skeptics and Critics Iran distrust rightfully point and motives its and hisyear35- nearly the to animosity Iranian of tory Unitthe against directed from Israel and States ed through attacks terrorist rhetand proxies Shiite for called has that oric Zionist“the of end the

state.” prevent to Failure acfrom Korea North al-( nuclear a quiring undetermined) though furas cited is capacity criticize to reason ther critmany And deal. the because that argue ics to appeared sanctions effects crippling have economy, its and Iran on lifted be shouldn’t they its dismantles Iran until

capacity. nuclear adminisObama The powerful a makes tration underfreeze the for case agreement the that scoring enfrom Iran keep will grade weapons riching destroying and uranium of stock its diluting or extraoran In - UPI any by time, dinary was week last measure

extraordinary. S.U. the Thursday, On The nuclear. went Senate requiremajoritysuper- althat votes 60 of ment the lowed confirmation block to ter” appresidential most of

ended. was pointees 50th the marked Friday F. John of anniversary

death. Kennedy’s brought Sunday And nuclear a of news the the between agreement perthe( One Plus 5P- the of members manent -Council Security N.U. United States, United the RusFrance, Kingdom, Gerplus China and sia AshCatherine and many head policy foreign ton, Union) European the of

Iran. and be will specifics The agreeThe studied. closely for Iran enriching from months six sodestroying uranium; enrichedmedium- called work halting uranium; produc-plutonium- a on and reactor; nuclear ing daily intrusive accepting nuclear its of inspection

facilities. Unitthe return, In beremit will States ed 7$ and billion 4$ tween currentIran to billion by frozen accounts in ly

sanctions. six next the Over have sides both months, coma finalize to promised binding and prehensive ensure will that agreement cannot and doesn’t Iran turn to capability a have energy nuclear peaceful weapons. into