Osama son-in-law fails to win US indictment dismissal

Accused of conspiring to kill Americans

NEW YORK, Nov 27, (RTRS): A son-in-law of Osama bin Laden, who once served as a spokesman for al-Qaeda, on Tuesday failed to win the dismissal of a US indictment accusing him of conspiring to kill Americans.

The defendant, Suleiman Abu Ghaith, also failed to win the suppression of statements he made while being interrogated by FBI agents nearly nine months ago, as he was being flown to the United States from Jordan to face the US conspiracy charge.

US District Judge Lewis Kaplan in Manhattan rejected Abu Ghaith’s arguments that federal prosecutors brought their case too late and violated his due process rights.

The judge found a lack of “credible evidence” that the United States could have indicted Abu Ghaith sooner and ended what the defendant called his “continual detention” in Iran from 2002 to January 2013, but instead deliberately waited to obtain a “tactical advantage.”

Kaplan also rejected Abu Ghaith’s contentions that he had not been read his Miranda rights, including the right to remain silent and have a lawyer present, until well after questioning began; that the FBI ignored his requests to talk with a lawyer; and that any statements he made were involuntary.

Abu Ghaith’s lawyers had argued that their client had been physically and psychologically coerced into answering agents’ questions “out of a combination of disorientation, fear, isolation, fatigue and sensory deprivation.”

But Kaplan said Abu Ghaith was “treated humanely” during the flight, where he had been given a medical evaluation, was regularly offered food and water, and was allowed to