Arab Times

Finding answers for patients with rarest of rare diseases

‘Push early to cut risks’

-

WASHINGTON, Oct 11, (Agencies): The youngster’s mysterious symptoms stumped every expert his parents consulted: No diagnosis explained why he couldn’t sit up on his own, or why he’d frequently choke, or his neurologic and intestinal abnormalit­ies.

Then they turned to a new national network that aims to diagnose the rarest of rare diseases – and learned Will Kilquist is the only person known in the world, so far, to harbor one particular genetic mutation that triggered all those health problems.

“It kind of put me at peace with myself, knowing there is absolutely nothing I could have done to prevent this,” said Kari Kilquist of Murphysbor­o, Illinois, Will’s mother.

The Undiagnose­d Diseases Network, set up by the National Institutes of Health, turns scientists into detectives to attack medicine’s cold cases – the patients left in diagnostic limbo because their symptoms didn’t match any known diseases. The idea: Offer them access to cutting-edge research, at no cost, in hopes that uncovering unique ailments would improve overall medical knowledge.

Wednesday, the network published a snapshot of its early findings that highlight the desperate demand for help.

Diagnosis

More than 1,500 people applied for an evaluation between 2015 and 2017 at the network’s initial seven patient sites. Just 601 in that first group were accepted, those deemed most likely to benefit, researcher­s reported in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Scientists came up with a diagnosis for about a third, 132 of the first 382 patients to complete their evaluation­s. And 31 of those diagnoses were never-before-known syndromes, according to the report.

Scientists hope to improve that diagnosis rate as more patients enter the program. Already, the applicatio­n number has nearly doubled and more mysteries have been solved. Last month, the NIH added five more hospitals to the network.

Even those who didn’t get a diagnosis at first “say we have hope just knowing there are people looking at our case still and we’re not forgotten,” said Dr Euan Ashley of Stanford University, one of the network sites.

Diagnosis doesn’t mean doctors automatica­lly know how to help. One in 5 had a specific therapy recommende­d. Ashley said other families were able to cancel expensive follow-up testing; he calculated the network approach could cut tens of thousands of dollars from the typical patient’s diagnostic odyssey.

In Illinois, Kari Kilquist didn’t expect Will’s treatment to change. He needs a wheelchair and feeding tube. He’s a happy child, about to turn 7, who spends his days in therapy and watching Sesame Street. Still his mother jumped at one last chance for diagnosis, and perhaps a way to learn what to expect as Will grows.

Will was examined at the NIH Clinical Center – the Bethesda, Maryland, hospital that first tackled undiagnose­d diseases and expanded the research into a network. Doctors found problems others had missed: Will produces no saliva, the reason his airways frequently clog, and doesn’t sweat. The clues pointed to a gene defect that affects how the body transports crucial nutrients across cells, explaining Will’s developmen­tal problems.

Now Kilquist wonders if, “Maybe Will could someday help another family learn more about their child.”

Delivery:

Women in their first pregnancy should push early in the delivery, as soon as the cervix is fully dilated, in order to minimize risks to themselves and he baby, according to a study of 2,000 American mothers.

Several previous studies have had mixed or contradict­ory findings on the two most common techniques used in American maternity wards: pushing immediatel­y or waiting about an hour in order to encourage spontaneou­s birth, which some doctors believe reduces the need for cesareans or forceps.

Safest

From May 2014 to December 2017, six American hospitals participat­ed in a study to determine which method is the safest for mother and child.

Hospital staff advised half the women to push immediatel­y after being fully dilated while recommendi­ng the others to wait an hour longer.

The 2,400 women who participat­ed were randomly placed in either group. All had received an epidural or other pain relief.

In the study published Tuesday in the JAMA journal, the researcher­s concluded that pushing immediatel­y reduced the risk of complicati­ons such as infections and hemorrhage for the mother, even if there was a greater risk of significan­t perineal tearing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Kuwait