Arab Times

N-TALKS IN VIENNA AS TEHRAN EXPANDS ENRICHMENT Iran open on prospects for N-bomb

Tehran ready to build atomic weapon at will

-

DUBAI, Aug 4, (AP): Iranian officials now speak openly about something long denied by Tehran as it enriches uranium at its closest-ever levels to weapons-grade material: The Islamic Republic is ready to build an atomic weapon at will.

The remarks could be bluster to force more bargaining-table concession­s from the U.S. without planning to seek the bomb. Or, as analysts warn, Iran could reach a point like North Korea did some 20 years ago where it decides having the ultimate weapon outweighs any further internatio­nal sanctions.

Meanwhile, negotiator­s from Iran, the U.S. and the European Union resumed monthslong, indirect talks over Tehran’s tattered nuclear deal Thursday, as internatio­nal inspectors reported that the Islamic Republic is expanding its uranium enrichment.

The resumption of the Vienna talks, suddenly called Wednesday, appeared not to include high-level representa­tion from all the countries that were part of Iran’s 2015 deal with world powers. The negotiatio­ns come as Western officials express growing skepticism over the prospects for a deal to restore the accord. The EU’s top diplomat has warned that “the space for additional significan­t compromise­s has been exhausted.”

Iran’s top negotiator, Ali Bagheri Kani, met with EU mediator Enrique Mora, Iranian media reported. As in other talks, the U.S. won’t directly negotiate with Iran. Instead, the two sides will speak through Mora.

U.S. Special Representa­tive for Iran Rob Malley also was on hand, tweeting Wednesday that “our expectatio­ns are in check.”

Mora also met Thursday with Russian Ambassador Mikhail Ulyanov, who has represente­d Moscow’s interests in the talks. Ulyanov also separately met with Bagheri Kani.

“As always we had a frank, pragmatic and constructi­ve exchange of views on ways and means of overcoming the last outstandin­g issues,” Ulyanov wrote on Twitter.

Stance

But going into the negotiatio­ns, Iran laid out a maximalist stance. Through its state-run IRNA news agency, Tehran denied that it had abandoned its effort to get America to delist its paramilita­ry Revolution­ary Guard as a terrorist organizati­on as a preconditi­on to a deal. That has been a main sticking point.

IRNA also quoted Iran’s civilian nuclear chief as saying turned-off surveillan­ce cameras of the Internatio­nal Atomic Energy Agency would be switched back on only if the West abandons an effort to investigat­e manmade traces of uranium found at previously undisclose­d sites in the country.

Those positions could doom the talks.

Hyperbole aside, the language taken as a whole marks a distinct verbal escalation from Tehran.

“In a few days we were able to enrich uranium up to 60% and we can easily produce 90% enriched uranium ... Iran has the technical means to produce a nuclear bomb but there has been no decision by Iran to build one,” Kamal Kharrazi, an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, told Al Jazeera in mid-July. Uranium enriched at 90% is considered weapons-grade.

Ataollah Mohajerani, a culture minister under reformist President Mohammad Khatami, then wrote in Iran’s Etemad daily newspaper that Kharrazi’s announceme­nt that Iran could make a nuclear weapon provided a “moral lesson” for Israel and President Joe Biden.

And finally Mohammad Eslami, the head of Iran’s civilian nuclear agency, made his own reported comment about a potential military aspect to Iran’s program.

“As Mr. Kharrazi mentioned, Iran has the technical ability to make an atomic bomb, but there is no such plan on the agenda,” Eslami said Monday, according to the semioffici­al Fars news agency.

Sign

Eslami’s agency later said he had been “misunderst­ood and misjudged” - likely a sign Iran’s theocracy didn’t want him to have been so specific. Eslami’s threat also carries more weight than others as he’s directly worked for Iranian defense agencies linked to Iran’s military nuclear program - including one that secretly built uranium-enriching centrifuge­s with Pakistani nuclear proliferat­or A.Q. Khan’s help.

But by 2003, Iran had abandoned its military nuclear program, according to U.S. intelligen­ce agencies, America’s European allies and IAEA inspectors. The U.S. had just invaded Iraq, citing later-debunked claims of Saddam Hussein hiding weapons of mass destructio­n. America already was at war in Afghanista­n, another nation neighborin­g Iran.

Libya under then-dictator Moammar Gadhafi gave up its own nascent military atomic program that relied on the same Pakistani-designed centrifuge­s that Tehran bought from Khan.

Ultimately, Iran reached its 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, which saw it receive economic sanctions relief while it drasticall­y curtailed its program. Under the deal, Tehran could enrich uranium to 3.67%, while maintainin­g a stockpile of uranium of 300 kilograms (660 pounds) under constant scrutiny of IAEA surveillan­ce cameras and inspectors.

 ?? (AP) ?? In this photo released by the Atomic Energy Organizati­on of Iran, technician­s work at the Arak heavy water reactor’s secondary circuit, as officials and media visit the site, near Arak, 150 miles (250 kilometers) southwest of the capital Tehran, Iran, Dec. 23, 2019. Iranian officials now speak openly about something long denied by Tehran as it enriches uranium at its closest-ever levels to weapons-grade material.
(AP) In this photo released by the Atomic Energy Organizati­on of Iran, technician­s work at the Arak heavy water reactor’s secondary circuit, as officials and media visit the site, near Arak, 150 miles (250 kilometers) southwest of the capital Tehran, Iran, Dec. 23, 2019. Iranian officials now speak openly about something long denied by Tehran as it enriches uranium at its closest-ever levels to weapons-grade material.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Kuwait